Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,458 posts)
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:20 PM Monday

Judge demands answers from Trump admin after it's accused of deporting migrants just 2 days after it was ordered not to

Source: Law & Crime

Jul 14th, 2025, 11:05 am


A federal judge in California has ordered the Trump administration to cough up information about whether it violated a court order by deporting a migrant who was recognized in a class-action family separation settlement just days after ICE was blocked from removing class members.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a motion last week asking U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw to order the government to produce information about whether class members recognized in the 2023 family separation policy settlement were being deported after learning about the migrant's removal and another deportation that allegedly occurred days earlier of a 13-year-old Guatemalan class member, his mother and two relatives.

The Biden-era settlement led to legal services and support being provided to migrants who were separated under President Donald Trump's zero tolerance immigration policy implemented during his first term. ACLU lawyers came forward in June and accused the Trump administration of violating the settlement agreement in various ways, including the removal of the 13-year-old. On June 27, Sabraw ruled that the administration was violating it, and he ordered officials to stop. The judge also halted deportations of class members while the ACLU litigation continues.

Two days after putting the block in place, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported an individual that the ACLU has identified as A.M.R.F., who was separated from his family at the U.S.-Mexico border during Trump's first term, according to the ACLU.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/detailed-explanation-in-a-sworn-declaration-judge-demands-answers-from-trump-admin-after-its-accused-of-deporting-migrants-just-2-days-after-it-was-ordered-not-to-do-so/



Full headline: 'Detailed explanation in a sworn declaration': Judge demands answers from Trump admin after it's accused of deporting migrants just 2 days after it was ordered not to do so

Link to ORDER (PDF viewer) - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25997325-judge-sabraw-order/

Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25997325/judge-sabraw-order.pdf
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge demands answers from Trump admin after it's accused of deporting migrants just 2 days after it was ordered not to (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Monday OP
Judges need to start jailing a few officials for contempt of court. viva la Monday #1
DOJ liberalgunwilltravel Monday #4
I agree, but when those are just given slightlv Monday #11
Department of Jackboots. Cha Monday #13
Plus Trump will just give them a pardon for any criminal behavior. cstanleytech Monday #14
Bingo. WinstonSmith4740 Monday #9
Lock up the scofflaws (R) BoRaGard Monday #10
and judges have the power azureblue Monday #18
It's very obvious that the Trump administration has contempt for the law. FuzzyRabbit Monday #2
He and maga have done exactly that and the media Eliot Rosewater Monday #5
All but declared war? slightlv Monday #12
Piece of shit administration response will be "fuck you" Eliot Rosewater Monday #3
Same, but autocracy sounds nicer, we need to use "dictatorship" to move the needle! tableturner Monday #6
Go pound sand judge. republianmushroom Monday #7
Well yeah, but whatta ya gonna do about it, eh. twodogsbarking Monday #8
Thugs, crooks, goons, whatever. When will judges realize that's who their dealing with and start Fil1957 Monday #15
they should do it NJCher Monday #16
Time to really think abouit these criminals bluestarone Monday #17
Courts and judges keep pissing into the wind, expecting the wind to change because of it. Magoo48 16 hrs ago #19

viva la

(4,169 posts)
1. Judges need to start jailing a few officials for contempt of court.
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:26 PM
Monday

Give them a taste of their own medicine.

I heard Kristi the Ghoul Noem saying that it's great to deport people to third countries that "offer them hospitality". You know, gulag hospitality.

4. DOJ
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:35 PM
Monday

Is responsible for enforcement of criminal contempt and Bondi’s DOJ would just ignore the judge. Civil contempt with massive, escalating fines is something the judge can currently do.

slightlv

(6,094 posts)
11. I agree, but when those are just given
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 04:48 PM
Monday

The middle finger what then? It's back to Noem. It's a catch22. And it always gets back to kristi doing the job of protecting trump instead of law and justice. What is a judge to do in this scenario? It's not like he has enforcement rights. We have a broken dismantled govt. We are living in a dictatorship encircled by an autocracy.

WinstonSmith4740

(3,358 posts)
9. Bingo.
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 04:41 PM
Monday

They will absolutely continue to give the middle finger to the law until judges start locking them up for contempt. Enough "do this again and there will be consequences." Let them squeal all they want. I'm tired of their whining.

azureblue

(2,482 posts)
18. and judges have the power
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 10:08 PM
Monday

to jail contemptuous lawyers right in court. Quit with warning after warning - give them one chance and that's all.
Start doing that when Trump's lawyers and the DOJ start playing games, and that crap will end quick.
Schedule those trials at the end of the work day on Friday, so the lawyer has to spend the week end in jail..

FuzzyRabbit

(2,169 posts)
2. It's very obvious that the Trump administration has contempt for the law.
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:34 PM
Monday

They just do whatever they want to, with no regard for the law or how it will impact anyone. "Floods in Texas, let's shut down FEMA. Court orders not to deport, let's deport anyway. Screw the law."

Trump has all but declared war on the US.

Eliot Rosewater

(33,127 posts)
5. He and maga have done exactly that and the media
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:36 PM
Monday

And the rest of us are still thinking this is a political issue, it’s not. It’s fascism and dictatorship.

slightlv

(6,094 posts)
12. All but declared war?
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 04:51 PM
Monday

I'd say he has declared war, including militarily invading blue states. The only he hasn't done is drop bombs. Hopefully people recognize the situation before it gets that far.

Eliot Rosewater

(33,127 posts)
3. Piece of shit administration response will be "fuck you"
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 03:35 PM
Monday

I don’t think most people have still grasped the reality that we are in a dictatorship.

Or autocracy, not really sure what the difference is.

Fil1957

(130 posts)
15. Thugs, crooks, goons, whatever. When will judges realize that's who their dealing with and start
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 05:27 PM
Monday

issuing contempt of court citations?

NJCher

(40,672 posts)
16. they should do it
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 06:23 PM
Monday

just to get it on the record that Bondi, Noem, et al refused to perform their duties.

At some point it will be prosecutable. In the meantime, let them wonder when that will be.

bluestarone

(19,935 posts)
17. Time to really think abouit these criminals
Mon Jul 14, 2025, 06:46 PM
Monday

They can cancel elections with THIS supreme courts blessing. THEY have a plan folks. BE READY!!

Magoo48

(6,517 posts)
19. Courts and judges keep pissing into the wind, expecting the wind to change because of it.
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 09:15 AM
16 hrs ago

Wait till you have an enforcement agency somewhere willing to back you up before making announcements. Every time one of your orders or edicts go unheated you simply look weaker.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge demands answers fro...