Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,769 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:35 PM Tuesday

Gavin Newsom's Warning to Donald Trump Over Plan for Texas Republicans

Source: Newsweek

Published Jul 15, 2025 at 5:21 PM EDT


California Governor Gavin Newsom issued a warning to President Donald Trump and Texas Republicans amid growing attempts at redrawing Texas's congressional districts to further favor Republicans ahead of the 2026 midterms. A spokesperson for Newsom told Newsweek his office is "closely tracking what Texas does" and "exploring potential options." Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email.

Why It Matters

Democrats are increasingly optimistic about their chances of retaking control of the House of Representatives next November. Trump's approval rating has struggled in many recent polls, and the party in the White House historically loses seats during the midterms.

Texas Republicans, however, are eyeing a plan to limit losses by redrawing the state's Congressional boundaries to benefit the party. Trump on Tuesday said he would like to see five new GOP seats in Texas, according to reporting by Jake Sherman of Punchbowl News. If Republicans move forward with that plan, it could cost Democrats seats in Congress, fueling calls for Democrats to do the same in their states.

What to Know

Newsom on Tuesday responded to a post on X from Sherman about the Texas plan by simply writing, "Two can play this game." Currently, Democrats hold 43 of California's Congressional seats, while Republicans hold only nine seats. Trump, meanwhile, received 38 percent of the state's votes. On the other hand, in Texas, Republicans currently hold 25 seats compared to Democrats' 13 seats. Texas is closer than California, with Harris receiving 42 percent of the vote last November.

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newsom-warning-donald-trump-texas-republican-redistricting-2099433







Gavin Newsom
@GavinNewsom
·
Follow
Two can play this game.
Jake Sherman
@JakeSherman
NEWS: PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP told Texas Republicans on a call this morning that the GOP will seek to get 5 new red seats in the mid-decade redistricting effort in Texas.

Big change in Texas that will have massive impact on the 2026 midterms.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gavin Newsom's Warning to Donald Trump Over Plan for Texas Republicans (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP
Isn't Texas... Gruenemann Tuesday #1
extremely moonshinegnomie Tuesday #9
District 5 is in the Dallas area, not Houston or Austin RussBLib Wednesday #15
We either need to stop promoting this red-blue concept or face reality... Moostache Tuesday #2
The problem with that thinking is there are many Democrats of lesser means who can't, or don't want to move for a .. electric_blue68 Tuesday #4
That's why I always said to accomplish this we'd have to offer slightlv Tuesday #7
Idk, it'd be great if they could be somewhere else, but that's not happenjng... electric_blue68 Tuesday #14
We on the left need to realize that MASSIVE pushback over DECADES would be required... Moostache Wednesday #17
Moos.. we think along the same lines, with the same passion... slightlv Thursday #19
A return to the concept of Greek city-states mnay be necessary. Moostache Wednesday #18
The problem with leeches Metaphorical Tuesday #5
"Trump on Tuesday said he would like to see five new GOP seats in Texas." sop Tuesday #3
Can two "play at that game"? FBaggins Tuesday #6
They do have this BumRushDaShow Tuesday #8
Population growth of 108k in a state of almost 40 million is actually shrinking relative to the rest of the country FBaggins Tuesday #10
That figure was over a single year. It was 250,000+ total over a couple years (including revisions). BumRushDaShow Tuesday #11
The 3.3 million nationally was also for a single year FBaggins Tuesday #12
An example of redrawing and backlash/back-firing BumRushDaShow Wednesday #16
AND.... I just spotted this article today (with CA's options) - BumRushDaShow Friday #20
It's a regular pattern: Illegal, Immoral and Unconstitutional. rickyhall Tuesday #13

moonshinegnomie

(3,524 posts)
9. extremely
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 08:07 PM
Tuesday

I live just outside austin
my district now runs from kayy (just outside houston ) to austin. heres a map of yexas districts. look at district 5

RussBLib

(9,958 posts)
15. District 5 is in the Dallas area, not Houston or Austin
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:08 AM
Wednesday

My district 15 stretches from the Rio Grande River up to San Antonio and New Braunfels. Monica de la Cruz became the first Republican and woman to ever win the district. But the district has been so contorted over the years, it's almost meaningless.

https://russblib.blogspot.com

Moostache

(10,682 posts)
2. We either need to stop promoting this red-blue concept or face reality...
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:43 PM
Tuesday

There is NO LONGER a "United States of America"...

Preesident Obama's famous speech simply no longerr applies to the current reality. For racist whites in America, the victory of President Obama was seen as an existential threat and loss of hegemony that had to be addressed more forcibly than anythinig since Gettysburg.

The current reality is our politicians are so wrapped up in gerry-mandering and purity-testing candidates that the actual act of GOVERNING is a distraction and the concept of COMPROMISE to move towards a better common future is dead.

Fuck it. Just declare the Red states what they are - The Neo-Confederate States of America, kick the out of the United States of America and their exit price is a renunciation of their share of the nation's nuclear arsenal. They can fuck right off into theocratic ruin while the rest of us can get down to the task of fixing our Supreme Court, our co-equal branches of government and our electoral system. We will also need a newly reevised Constitution but working with these dumbass fuckers from MAGA areas is a waste of time.

They don't want anything - except a continued gravy train of Blue State money to fund their failing state and local areas. Fuck 'em. I want out, I want them gone and I plan to show them the EXACT SAME level of compassion and empathy they are currently showing immigrants and minority groups today - FUCKING ZERO. They can all die and rot in their streets for all I care...after we dissolve this broken union their problems are their own and their fate is sealed.

electric_blue68

(22,425 posts)
4. The problem with that thinking is there are many Democrats of lesser means who can't, or don't want to move for a ..
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:07 PM
Tuesday

variety of legitimate reasons!

So you leave them to an even more awful fate?

I live in a big, blue city in a more Blue State area, but I'm concerned for others elsewhere - esp lower income, women, POCs, elders in those States of Democrats, Democratic leanjngs.

slightlv

(6,127 posts)
7. That's why I always said to accomplish this we'd have to offer
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:27 PM
Tuesday

relocation assistance to those who want to move OUT of the Red States, and to those who want to move OUT of the Blue States. That, in itself, makes it unworkable. But you can't split the country without allowing and helping people move to where they want to be. I've been saying for years I wish to holy hell they'd just secede and start their own country. But there are so many problems and issues to work out, and the one thing maga types aren't known for is patience enough to work out equitable solutions. And, honestly, at this point, I don't think WE'RE than patient either! I know I, for one, want them gone... I don't even care how. No, scratch that... I actually want them to move to some other country where they can live their bubbled religious lives and leave the rest of us alone. You'd think by now they'd realize they ain't gonna be raptured... or maybe they got "left behind" and start to make tracks to move someplace that better fit them than the country and ideals the Founders gave them.

electric_blue68

(22,425 posts)
14. Idk, it'd be great if they could be somewhere else, but that's not happenjng...
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 11:31 PM
Tuesday

The best we can do is get our country back as flawed as it, and try to reduce the power they hold; so at least it effects less of us!
Sort of since ginning up the religious right since Reagan's time aI thknk

Moostache

(10,682 posts)
17. We on the left need to realize that MASSIVE pushback over DECADES would be required...
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:35 PM
Wednesday

The religious right ran around for 40 years threatening Roe and campaigning and donating and consolidating power, recruiting money and power and getting things like $$$ = speech, women = chattle and immigrants = aliens into the venacular.

To SLOW that march now would take 80 years of the same level of pushback...first to slow the march, then to stop it and finally to reverse it back to where we were in 1973!

That would be nearing the end of the lifespan of my children and probably my grandchildren (should I be lucky enough to have any)...

We tremble and quake whenever the goddamn 2nd amendment gets wavied around yet we cower and hide when the 1st amendement is bastardized and attacked relentlessly?

We have accepted a stacked Supreme Court - illegally packed with ideologues and liars.
We have passively accepted gerrymandering that makes every Republican vote have the same heft as 2 to 2.5 Democratic votes.
We have watched our mothers, daughters, sisters and nieces be stripped of autonomy and agency for their own bodies.

In short, we are now facing the fruits of 45 years of relentless attacks that have become the very definition of the immovable object. I do not believe this can be reversed for exactly that reason - the time it would take to do so in no longer measured in timescales that people can abide. A human lifetime is at best an average of 80 years. It will take more than that to get back to baseline now. That does not inspire people to action. But the horrors of the overreach in the current GOP hatred IS enough to motivate, painful enough to move people into action.

The status quo cannot hold for long. The GOP wishes to make it WORSE, which can only accelerate the inevitable - a partitioning of the union and a split of the nation. It is coming. It NEVER was fully healed after 1865. The original sin of this nation is still rending it in two as we approach the 250 year mark that will become the marker of the end of the First Republic, the partitioning of the continent and the dawn of the Second Republic.

slightlv

(6,127 posts)
19. Moos.. we think along the same lines, with the same passion...
Thu Jul 17, 2025, 12:18 AM
Thursday

The only problem I see with splitting the U.S. (besides the need to move people to their desired "sides&quot is that the wingnuts are too inherently violent. WE know the laws and rules they would implement in their country would make it unliveable, even for the true believers (unless we're talking about tech bros, etc). People would be starving in the masses... there would be no medical care available for them, no jobs worth doing and paying anything. They're likely to end up slaves to the $$$ classes, without the care and feeding of such that might have gone in the past. Do you think they'll turn against their masters to make things better for themselves, or still blame the other half of the country, tho we have nothing to do with them anymore? I believe they'll STILL be blaming us for everything to their last dying breath. And, as such, they will make war. And, unfortunately, I don't believe the U.S. would have the fortitude to strip the military bases in Redland before turning loose the poor dears. So, they'll have all the military bases to raid and start their Civil War 2.0 (or maybe 3.0 by that time). One of my dearest friends and I have gone over these scenarios time after time over the last 5 years. The only thing I can see is to move them off the land of America completely, and put them where their ideology fits best. They can become part of some other country's resistance. Because like those I've started reading who immigrated to Russia, they're not real happy over there. These people are never going to be happy ANYWHERE, because to achieve that, you have to like, admire, and be happy with yourself. And the one thing ALL these people have in common is that hate themselves, first and foremost. Get them out of the country, move our resources and people who are wanting and willing to do the work to make the land fertile and productive once again into the areas. And if anyone tries to come back in, deport them back to their adopted country immediately.

I do believe in your timelines... only one small change I'd make. The religious nuts have been at this for far more than 40 years. They've been doing this since the Church of God split into two factions... mainstream and evangelical nut cases. We're talking close to hundred years they've been on the move to make this country a theocracy of their own design. Every time the world didn't end when they predicted it, they doubled down because they believed the situation wasn't right for christ to return, so they'd have to make sure it was for the next time. People like this don't change their beliefs. They're too ingrained, generation through generation through generation. IMO, they're actually worse than the Islamists that good Muslims have to deal with. And they will become just as deadly as the Islamists, I thoroughly believe.

Moostache

(10,682 posts)
18. A return to the concept of Greek city-states mnay be necessary.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:41 PM
Wednesday

Territorial continuity is unlikely.
Political affiliation and alliances may be necessary for people like myself - in a Blue city, stuck in the middle of Red State deserts in all directions.

Or I may have to make a choice - live under the yoke of oppression and theocratic dictatorship or uproot myself and my family to live in a moderate modern state or area. The decision is already made for me. I am leaving as soon as it becomes feasible or necessary. I will leave everything behind and start over. This will sadly include family members who have joined the opposing cult. I won't miss them.

Divorce and dissolution are never easy and always hurt everyone unequally. There is just no legal or legitimate path to the kind of reforms that would be needed to fix the currently destroyed state of the American government, legal system or its economy as it sits today. The tectonic plates have been rubbing for a long, long time. The quake is imminent.

Metaphorical

(2,470 posts)
5. The problem with leeches
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:16 PM
Tuesday

is that they fight most violently when being extracted from their hosts..

sop

(15,209 posts)
3. "Trump on Tuesday said he would like to see five new GOP seats in Texas."
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 06:45 PM
Tuesday

Reminds me of the time Trump demanded Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger "find 11,780 votes" to overturn the state's election results. That was a crime as well.

FBaggins

(28,247 posts)
6. Can two "play at that game"?
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:18 PM
Tuesday

California congressional districts are drawn by an independent commission mandated by their constitution - and I don't think any of their guidelines for mid-decade redistricting include "Texas is doing it".

Plus - while there's no easy way to draw TX with a gain of five red seats for next year (though two would be easy)... it's even harder in CA given the fact that they could lose four or even five seats in the next reapportionment (while TX picks up three or four).

OH is actually required to redistrict for next year... few other states have an easy path to "play at that game". Our path to victory involves changing votes... not redrawing lines.

BumRushDaShow

(156,769 posts)
8. They do have this
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:59 PM
Tuesday
California’s population increases — again (May 1, 2025)

And they might be able to justify it based on population increases and shifts in populations in the current Districts as they usually try to keep them semi-the same size (I think the districts are now up to like 750,000+ each).

After the 2020 Census here in PA when we lost a seat, because there was a loss of population on the western (red areas) side of the state, they redrew the Districts to remove a District from there and then tweaked the borders for Districts here in the east.

The BIG un-gerrymandering here in PA happened in 2018 (not only redrawn but renumbered and relocated). So by 2020 and later, they already had the basic layout without the "Goofy Kicking Donald Duck" 7th Congressional District and other meandering Districts.

7th Congressional District BEFORE 2018



7th Congressional District AFTER 2018

FBaggins

(28,247 posts)
10. Population growth of 108k in a state of almost 40 million is actually shrinking relative to the rest of the country
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 08:11 PM
Tuesday

To keep up with the national average, they would actually have to grow almost four times as fast (the population of the US grew by ~3.3 million)

And to expand on what I said before - California doesn't draw their congressional districts through the state legislature. The constitution was amended to put the line drawing in the hands of a commission... and three of the five mandated republicans must vote in favor in order to change the lines.

While we do have sizable-enough majorities in the state legislature to propose an amendment (CA goes through them like tissues)... it would still have to go for a popular vote. So to "play that game" Newsome would have to have the legislature amend the constitution, and hold a special election to put it to the voters. All when CA is already pretty solidly blue

BumRushDaShow

(156,769 posts)
11. That figure was over a single year. It was 250,000+ total over a couple years (including revisions).
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 08:29 PM
Tuesday

Plus there are a couple Districts that were originally close (R) ones (I know the 45th & 47th, the latter including red areas like Huntington Beach), where (D)s flipped the seat.

And since CA is a trifecta with a super-majority, they can change the law if they want. Just have to see what Newsom has in mind.

And what you describe (in your edit) is exactly what TX is doing now - calling a special session to dick around with their lines.

FBaggins

(28,247 posts)
12. The 3.3 million nationally was also for a single year
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 08:45 PM
Tuesday

California is shrinking in population as a proportion of the nation and is likely to lose multiple seats in the next reapportionment.

Plus there are a couple Districts that were originally close (R) ones (I know the 45th & 47th, the latter including red areas like Huntington Beach), where (D)s flipped the seat.

That isn't a good thing as a measure of how easy it would be to draw new blue seats. It's actually the opposite. There are only two red seats in CA where republicans won by fewer than ten points... but eight blue districts that fit that bucket (four of which were closer than three points). We already hold a 43-9 advantage... there just isn't room to pick up much more.

And what you describe (in your edit) is exactly what TX is doing now - calling a special session to dick around with their lines.

Which is irresponsible and wrong-headed... but not surprising. More importantly - it's far easier than amending even CA's constitution... and OH is easier than either of them.

BumRushDaShow

(156,769 posts)
16. An example of redrawing and backlash/back-firing
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 04:48 AM
Wednesday

and then re-redrawing, would be NY. I think NY lost 5 or 6 (D) seats when they did their 2020 redistricting, ending up having instances of 2 (D)s suddenly running against each other for a new "combined" seat (Nadler vs Maloney was one example). They eventually tweaked it in 2024 and recovered a couple (D)s, but it seems the damage was done.

Alternately, FL had done like TX and managed to manufacture ~5 new (R) seats.

I think the overarching issue is the idea of "gerrymandering" and the apparent SCOTUS dipping and dodging around it (since "elections" are generally handled by the states).

I found an interesting discussion about the recent realignments here and the problems that we as (D)s face - How Gerrymandering Tilts the 2024 Race for the House

and what was noted was this -

(snip)

State courts also played a role in creating Republican advantages, because courts in states where Republicans drew maps (many of them with judges elected in partisan elections) have been much less inclined to police partisan gerrymandering than their counterparts in Democratic states. Thus, while large Democratic-favoring skews have been mostly corrected through legal review, Republican-favoring skews have almost uniformly remained uncorrected. Indeed, courts in many GOP states have followed federal courts’ lead in declaring gerrymandering claims to be political questions that courts have no authority to address.

(snip)


The above observation is concerning. However an interesting "game changer", which has seemingly upended some of the gerrymandering (including for Congressional seats) is the "Ranked Choice" option for primaries and/or the general election. Similarly I think CA has a "jungle primary". This introduces all kinds of candidates, including independents, into the equation.

I know here in PA, we have a closed primary and just this morning, I heard a news story where some indies here in Philly have petitioned the state Supreme Court to force the legislature to change to an "open primary". They noted that PA now has something like 1 million "registered" unaffiliated/Independent voters (I think also distinguishing from some of the known-named "3rd parties" here like the Libertarian Party, Green Party, Constitution Party, Working Families Party", etc).

So I expect the whole "system" is in transition and we are in the middle of the "sausage-making" of that.

BumRushDaShow

(156,769 posts)
20. AND.... I just spotted this article today (with CA's options) -
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 07:37 PM
Friday
Texas Republicans might redraw congressional maps. Democrats plan to strike back

By Brittany Shepherd, Tiffany Li, Oren Oppenheim, and Olivia Osteen
July 18, 2025, 3:13 PM

(snip)

California's Gov. Gavin Newsom is being more explicit – telling the Pod Save America podcast that he has spoken to state lawmakers about calling a special session to begin making changes to state law in order to redraw their districts in response to Abbott. "If we're gonna play fair in a world that is wholly unfair, we may have the higher moral ground, but the ground is shifting from underneath us. And I think we have to wake up to that reality," Newsom said.

California has an independent redistricting commission intended to prevent gerrymandering, but Paul Mitchell, an elections and redistricting expert, said Newsom could go around the commission either by getting voters' approval on a ballot measure in a special election or by arguing in court.

A potential ballot measure could halt the commission's authority to draw congressional districts until other states began using similar commissions, and "could all be done in time for the next election" without legal issues. The biggest uncertainty in this scenario would be whether or not voters would support it.

Alternatively, Newsom could argue the commission only has authority over decade-end redistricting, but the legislature can still redistrict mid-decade. Mitchell said it was a coin toss whether the California Supreme Court would uphold this argument.

(snip)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gavin Newsom's Warning to...