Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,777 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 07:02 PM Tuesday

Global AIDS program PEPFAR saved from congressional funding cuts

Source: NPR

Updated July 15, 2025 3:36 PM ET


PEPFAR , the U.S. AIDS relief program begun by President George W Bush, has been saved from the $9.4 billion package of proposed funding cuts the Senate is considering, according to Senate Majority Leader John Thune. PEPFAR - The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief - supports HIV treatment worldwide and has been credited with saving millions of lives in its 22 years. PEPFAR was part of the foreign aid portion of the rescissions package the Trump administration sent to Congress.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting remains part of the package and stands to lose about $1.1 billion in funding. The administration will now use money from a Department of Interior program to fund 28 public radio stations serving Native American communities in 9 states, with grants going directly to the stations, according to Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD). Earlier, Senator Rounds had said 14 states and he has corrected the number. GOP leaders are planning the first procedural vote on the rescissions package for this evening.

The Senate has been moving to vote this week on the Trump administration's request to claw back federal funding for public media and foreign assistance programs.

The House approved the package last month in a largely party-line vote, but several GOP senators are pressing for changes in the $9.4 billion in spending cuts the Office of Management and Budget asked Congress to eliminate. Some proposed cuts could be scaled back or new parameters could be added by Congress for the way funds are distributed.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2025/07/15/g-s1-77572/npr-pbs-funding-rescission-congress



Since what the House passed has been changed, once the Senate votes on it, then it would have to go back to the House for another vote.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

progree

(12,098 posts)
1. I thought the admin stopped funding PEPFAR completely and immediately back in January,
Tue Jul 15, 2025, 10:42 PM
Tuesday

I've read many many stories over the past months about all the devastation that has wrought, like I don't know how many thousands of pregnant women suddenly not taking antiviral medications and thereby passing HIV to their fetuses. Plus just in general spreading as viral loads increase by several orders of magnitude. But maybe I'm just reading alarmist woke Mother Jones crap I guess. Anyway great to hear that our friends across the aisle are saving it, such wonderful humanitarians /s.

BumRushDaShow

(156,777 posts)
3. They put illegal "holds" on a whole lot of funding *already allocated* across various programs
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 06:39 AM
Wednesday

some of which are the subject of court halts. The funding wasn't actually "removed" though.

THIS Recessions legislation is designed TO "legally remove" that funding altogether and the version of this legislation that the Senate is reviewing, had already passed the House with that funding completely removed.

However the Senate has decided to add it back in (meaning a change that will force the House to re-vote on the revised bill).

summer_in_TX

(3,697 posts)
2. My interpretation is that the Trump administration suspended PEPFAR and want to end it.
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 12:38 AM
Wednesday

But they were forced to go to Congress to ask for a recision of the funding. Congress has apparently decided to keep it. Hopefully. A tiny bit of good news amidst a flood of bad.

BumRushDaShow

(156,777 posts)
4. It's exactly that. They have violated the Impoundment Control Act
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 06:44 AM
Wednesday

by refusing to spend money already allocated by Congress to fund specific things. The "remedy" to LEGALLY "give back" those funds, is to submit "Rescissions" legislation to agree to remove previously-allocated funds that had been designated in earlier appropriations legislation.

IOW, 45's administration has acted "backasswards". "Fire! Ready. Aim".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Global AIDS program PEPFA...