Pressure grows to unmask ICE
Source: Salon
Published July 19, 2025 6:30AM (EDT)
The push to unmask ICE agents is catching fire, as backlash grows to President Donald Trumps policy of mass deportation.
It comes across as kidnappings. At some point, where do we end up with vigilantes? Or where does this lead to a vigilante-type system with immigration or vigilante posses, or at what point do they end up hiring mercenary-type paramilitary? Weve talked for years about making sure police are that theres full transparency, New York state Sen. Patricia Fahy told Salon. Theyre not even identifying themselves or producing the appropriate warrants that are mandated.
Fahy is sponsoring the MELT Act, a bill that would require ICE agents operating in New York to unmask and identify themselves. She said the bill is about holding ICE to the same standards as other law enforcement.
Fahy explained that allowing ICE to continue to operate as it has been also allows criminals to exploit peoples fear of ICE. We are seeing incidents, some pretty horrific ones of impersonating officers, he said, and weve already had issues with paramilitary organizations in some areas and vigilantism, and I worry that it is going to fuel that.
Read more: https://www.salon.com/2025/07/19/it-comes-across-as-kidnapping-pressure-grows-to-unmask-ice/

JustAnotherGen
(35,678 posts)The ICE Agents supposed fear. Like - if they are such a bunch of cry baby wusses - then get another job.
Then again, I think they and their progeny should lose the right to vote for 20 years when the Regime falls. I see no difference between them and slave catchers and want extreme punishment for them.
Justice Brandeis
(87 posts)This Federalism 101 that even a pre-law undergraduate would know.
BumRushDaShow
(156,766 posts)Feds are supposed to follow state law. So if a state bars a right-hand turn against a red light, the fed could be charged for violating that traffic law (exceptions obviously if the LEO was in a pursuit of a suspect).
You also have many feds/LEO who are operating "under cover" and "plain clothes" as part of an investigation. But in those cases, they are usually required to produce credentials for identification. Even in my own agency, all of us had official credentials to show when we went to one of our regulated industry sites (and our investigators had metal badges on theirs).
Normally, municipal/county/state/federal LEO have MOUs and partnership agreements because that benefits all of them by expanding the amount of resources to carry out their duties. But when you have rogues in any of these levels of government, that creates problems.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,969 posts)They won't be able to enforce it.