Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,268 posts)
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 02:25 PM Jul 24

MyPillow Founder Will Not Pay Winnings for Election Challenge, Court Rules

Source: New York Times


By Ali Watkins
July 24, 2025, 11:49 a.m. ET

A federal appeals court has ruled that Mike Lindell, the MyPillow founder, does not have to pay out $5 million to a software developer who had entered a challenge held by Mr. Lindell inviting skeptics to disprove his claims of interference in the 2020 presidential election.

An arbitration panel had previously ordered Mr. Lindell to pay the $5 million to Robert Zeidman, a software developer who entered Mr. Lindell’s “Prove Mike Wrong” challenge, which offered a $5 million reward to anyone who could debunk what Mr. Lindell called evidence of Chinese interference in the 2020 election.

The ruling, issued by an appeals court in Minnesota on Wednesday, signals the end of a yearslong back and forth between Mr. Lindell and Mr. Zeidman, whose battle over the Challenge reward grafts directly from Mr. Lindell’s yearslong, baseless claims that the 2020 election was stolen from President Donald J. Trump.

“It’s a great day for our country,” Mr. Lindell said in an interview.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/elections/mypillow-founder-challenge-winnings.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jimvanhise

(471 posts)
2. SO CONTEST RULES DON'T MEAN ANYTHING?
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 02:33 PM
Jul 24

It is illegal to offer a prize and then not pay up. This makes no sense.

TheRickles

(2,888 posts)
4. Was it up to Lindell to determine whether it was a full debunk or not?
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 02:41 PM
Jul 24

The NYT is behind a paywall, so I can't check for details, but I'm sure there was a loophole. Similar to The Amazing Randi never having to pay out the $1M prize for a genuine demonstrations of psychic phenomena, because he got to set all the criteria.

muriel_volestrangler

(104,226 posts)
7. From an archive:
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 03:00 PM
Jul 24
The crux of Mr. Zeidman’s evidence was that Mr. Lindell’s supposed proof of election interference did not include voting machines’ packet capture data, which refers to a unique signature on original data that is transferred from a specific place and time.

However, in a ruling published on Wednesday, a panel of federal appeals judges found that, because Mr. Lindell’s rules for the challenge were written broadly, the evidence Mr. Zeidman presented debunking Mr. Lindell’s claims was not unequivocal.

“From the four corners of the Challenge contract as defined by the Official Rules, there is no way to read ‘information related to the November 2020 election’ as meaning only information that is packet capture data,” the ruling said.

https://archive.ph/wZYfM

I don't know if that helps; I can't be bothered to find Lindell's idiotic game "rules".

TheRickles

(2,888 posts)
13. Randi's attempts to debunk parapsychology have come under a lot of criticism from serious researchers.
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 06:03 PM
Jul 24

Here is a good critique, with a section part way through on his million dollar challenge:
https://mitch-horowitz-nyc.medium.com/the-man-who-destroyed-skepticism-be35a6e5c5e4
"There is more to heaven and earth, Horatio..."

appmanga

(1,223 posts)
16. "Serious researchers" of the paranormal...
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 07:38 PM
Jul 24

...hits me like "serious scholars of Flat Earth". I love this excerpt:

Another case was Randi’s yearly “million-dollar challenge,” often held in Las Vegas, in which he tempted psychics with a cash prize. For years it was an annual charade to which virtually no serious observer or claimant would venture near.


If the discovery or claim stands up to the scientific method, it's proven. If such a thing could be demonstrated during Randi's lifetime, he would have suffered for not holding to his word and made into Randi stew.

And you can't "debunk" what's not true; you can debunk the claim and expose the lie. There's no debunking something that hasn't been proved to have happened.

TheRickles

(2,888 posts)
17. Here are some FAQs from the Parapsychological Association
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 08:16 PM
Jul 24
https://www.parapsych.org/section/36/frequently_asked_questions.aspx

Perhaps it's hard to believe, but an international group of several hundred psychologists, psychiatrists, physicists and other scientists are applying the scientific method to these unusual experiences. Check out the journal to see what sort of research projects are ongoing before you dismiss it all out of hand.

VeryProgressive

(67 posts)
14. What?
Thu Jul 24, 2025, 07:25 PM
Jul 24

There was never a genuine demonstration of psychic phenomena. That's why the Amazing Randi never had to pay up. Please don't equate these completely different things.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MyPillow Founder Will Not...