Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groundloop

(13,160 posts)
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:39 PM Monday

Ghislaine Maxwell makes pitch to Supreme Court

Source: ABC News

The U.S. Supreme Court should hear Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2021 sex trafficking conviction because the government has an "obligation to honor" a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein that inoculated Maxwell from any criminal charges, her lawyers argued in a brief to the Supreme Court Monday.

"Plea and non-prosecution agreements resolve nearly every federal case. They routinely include promises that extend to others—co-conspirators, family members, potential witnesses. If those promises mean different things in different parts of the country, then trust in our system collapses," the brief said.

Federal prosecutors have argued that the non-prosecution agreement applied only in Florida and did not bind New York, where charges against him, and subsequently Maxwell, were brought.

"It is not geographically limited to the Southern District of Florida, it is not conditioned on the co-conspirators being known by the government at the time, it does not depend on what any particular government attorney may have had in his or her head about who might be a co-conspirator, and it contains no other caveat or exception. This should be the end of the discussion," the defense brief said.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ghislaine-maxwell-makes-pitch-supreme-court/story?id=124144128

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ghislaine Maxwell makes pitch to Supreme Court (Original Post) groundloop Monday OP
Go ahead John Roberts, I triple-dog-dare you... Fiendish Thingy Monday #1
You often have clever readings of the Court Prairie Gates Monday #5
Sure, that's a possibility Fiendish Thingy Monday #6
They will rule Miguelito Loveless Monday #19
The argument on jurisdictional specificity has some merit on its face; whether an agreement with Epstein Prairie Gates Monday #2
She wasn't named or charged during the original case IbogaProject Monday #3
This court STALLS on everything against TSF, BUT THIS could help him, so i'm thinkiong THIS is their plan bluestarone Monday #4
I dunno. Even 'Pucker Up And Kiss Trump's Ass' Chief Justice might balk at allowing THIS can of worms into the building Attilatheblond Monday #9
A convenient way to avoid pardoning or commuting her tishaLA Monday #7
Yup, the SC could tidy this all up - nice and neatly - and once again, Trump escapes accountability. Marie Marie Monday #20
IMHO and I am not an attorney UpInArms Monday #8
But she's white and rich, so she thinks she's getting out Attilatheblond Monday #11
See post #16. onenote Monday #17
This is silly. Jacson6 Monday #10
Holder of the evidence has magical powers Attilatheblond Monday #12
The plea deal was broadly worded and she falls within its scope. onenote Monday #16
I think the opposite here. bluestarone Monday #18
Did Epstein ACUALLY FULFILL ALL the terms 3825-87867 Monday #21
Yes. It was a sweetheart deal. Didn't require that much. onenote Monday #22
It all depends on what she knows about certain of the "Men in Black Nightgowns" usonian Monday #13
drumpf always gets others to do his dirty work for him JoseBalow Monday #14
The dirty half-dozen will accept this bullshit so Trump doesn't have to pardon her hadEnuf Monday #15
This whole scenario is disgusting mdbl Monday #23

Fiendish Thingy

(20,217 posts)
1. Go ahead John Roberts, I triple-dog-dare you...
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:44 PM
Monday

Set Maxwell free, and prepare yourself for five new, liberal justices in 2029.

Prairie Gates

(5,741 posts)
5. You often have clever readings of the Court
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:52 PM
Monday

What do you think about the merits of the appeal? There's at least something to the idea that if you make a deal with federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida that deal has to be honored in the Southern District of New York as well, no? The Roberts court has of course been perfectly happy to smash federalism when it benefits the Republican Party and inflate a giant Leviathan of federalism when it suits the Republican Party, so there's no telling how their supposed belief systems will view this federalist argument. They would at least get to knock it down while pretending to their usual antifederalist nonsense. I suspect they'll avoid the issue altogether and simply say that the agreement must explicitly apply to Maxwell or the question is moot, thereby avoiding the whole problem of turning every local US Attorney's office into a de facto separate jurisdiction.

Fiendish Thingy

(20,217 posts)
6. Sure, that's a possibility
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:57 PM
Monday

I was just projecting the likely fallout if the Roberts court was foolhardy enough to overturn Maxwell’s conviction.

The uproar would create a momentum for court expansion that Dems could act upon, kill the filibuster and expand the court without fear of voter backlash.

Prairie Gates

(5,741 posts)
2. The argument on jurisdictional specificity has some merit on its face; whether an agreement with Epstein
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:45 PM
Monday

extends to Maxwell implicitly is another matter.

That said, it does seem to beg the question of why Epstein would kill himself so early in the process if he did have a fairly good grounds for appeal on this issue - certainly better than Maxwell's, since the agreement was explicitly with him.

bluestarone

(20,005 posts)
4. This court STALLS on everything against TSF, BUT THIS could help him, so i'm thinkiong THIS is their plan
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 01:48 PM
Monday

They will decide to drop her charges and release her from ever testifying again. The FIX is in. (Please tell me i'm wrong in my thinking)

Attilatheblond

(6,779 posts)
9. I dunno. Even 'Pucker Up And Kiss Trump's Ass' Chief Justice might balk at allowing THIS can of worms into the building
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:08 PM
Monday

It's a lose/lose situation for Roberts, and he's a coward, so probably not going to take the bait.

I'm not a legal eagle, but an observer of cowards from way back. Roberts knows the ice under him is getting mighty thin.

tishaLA

(14,677 posts)
7. A convenient way to avoid pardoning or commuting her
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:05 PM
Monday

it's so disgusting that I'm sure she'll have five safe votes.

Marie Marie

(10,382 posts)
20. Yup, the SC could tidy this all up - nice and neatly - and once again, Trump escapes accountability.
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 03:42 PM
Monday

UpInArms

(53,194 posts)
8. IMHO and I am not an attorney
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:06 PM
Monday

Unless she was specifically named in the non prosecution agreement, she has no grounds

Attilatheblond

(6,779 posts)
11. But she's white and rich, so she thinks she's getting out
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:12 PM
Monday

She forgot a couple of things:
She's female and therefore her entitlement card isn't as good as if she was male.
She has become an inconvenience to a lot of powerful entitled males. Wonder what the actuaries are for women like her.

onenote

(45,525 posts)
16. The plea deal was broadly worded and she falls within its scope.
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:55 PM
Monday

The non-prosecution agreement provided that "if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova."

The decision to allow the prosecution of Maxwell did not turn on a finding by the court below that it wasn't intended to cover her. It turned on the issue before the SCOTUS -- is the agreement enforceable only in the district where it was entered or in any district in the country.

Personally, I think the Court should uphold the ruling below that allowed the prosecution to move forward, but it's hardly a slam dunk

bluestarone

(20,005 posts)
18. I think the opposite here.
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 03:12 PM
Monday

All this court needs is any kind of loophole that will protect TSF. I say it's a SLAM DUNK for this court to allow her to go free! (then turn up dead later)

3825-87867

(1,490 posts)
21. Did Epstein ACUALLY FULFILL ALL the terms
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 07:35 PM
Monday

of the agreement? SInce he"died" I would think, no, but I don't work for tramp.

onenote

(45,525 posts)
22. Yes. It was a sweetheart deal. Didn't require that much.
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 07:43 PM
Monday

Per the agreement, he appeared in state court and pled guilty to the pending state indictment charging felony solicitation of prostitution and, pursuant to the NPA, to a criminal information charging him with procurement of minors to engage in prostitution. Upon the joint request of the defendant and the state prosecutor, and consistent with the NPA, the court immediately sentenced Epstein to consecutive terms of 12 months’ incarceration on the solicitation charge and 6 months’ incarceration on the procurement charge, followed by 12 months of community control. Epstein began serving the sentence that day, in a minimum-security Palm Beach County facility.

Soon after he was incarcerated, Epstein applied for the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s work release program, and the Sheriff approved his application. In October 2008, Epstein began spending 12 hours a day purportedly working at the “Florida Science Foundation,” an entity Epstein had recently incorporated that was co-located at the West Palm Beach office of one of Epstein’s attorneys. Although the NPA specified a term of incarceration of 18 months, Epstein received “gain time,” that is, time off for good behavior, and he actually served less than 13 months of incarceration. On July 22, 2009, Epstein was released from custody to a one-year term of home detention as a condition of community control, and he registered as a sexual offender with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

usonian

(19,391 posts)
13. It all depends on what she knows about certain of the "Men in Black Nightgowns"
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:22 PM
Monday

Why, I'll bet

JoseBalow

(8,026 posts)
14. drumpf always gets others to do his dirty work for him
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:25 PM
Monday

so he can play dumb and deny any knowledge or culpability. He learned that trick from Roy Cohn.

He always tries to avoid getting his own hands dirty at all costs... Just ask his caddies.

hadEnuf

(3,324 posts)
15. The dirty half-dozen will accept this bullshit so Trump doesn't have to pardon her
Mon Jul 28, 2025, 02:29 PM
Monday

after she says exactly what he wants her to say.

The fix is in.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ghislaine Maxwell makes p...