Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,969 posts)
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:32 AM Jul 30

U.S. economy grew at a 3% rate in Q2, a better-than-expected pace even as Trump's tariffs hit

Source: CNBC

Published Wed, Jul 30 2025 8:30 AM EDT Updated 13 Min Ago


The U.S. economy grew at a much better than expected pace in the second quarter, powered by a turnaround in the trade balance and renewed consumer strength, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday.

Gross domestic product, a sum of goods and services activity across the sprawling U.S. economy, jumped 3% for the April-through-June period, according to figures adjusted for seasonality and inflation.

That topped the Dow Jones estimate for 2.3% and helped reverse a decline of 0.5% for the first quarter that came largely due to a huge drop in imports, which subtract from the total, as well as a weak consumer spending amid tariff concerns.

The period reported Wednesday includes President Donald Trump’s April 2 “liberation day” tariff announcement. Imports had jumped in the first quarters as companies sought to get ahead of the announcement.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/30/gdp-q2-2025-.html



From the source -




BEA News
@BEA_News
·
Follow
The U.S. economy grew at a 3.0% annualized rate in Q2.
https://bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

#GDP
8:30 AM · Jul 30, 2025


Article updated.

Original article -

Published Wed, Jul 30 2025 8:30 AM EDT


Gross domestic product was expected to grow at a 2.3% annualized pace in the second quarter, according to the Dow Jones consensus estimate.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. economy grew at a 3% rate in Q2, a better-than-expected pace even as Trump's tariffs hit (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jul 30 OP
Am I supposed to believe that? JMCKUSICK Jul 30 #1
Always my first response. How do you believe a bunch of liars? mdbl Jul 30 #39
I just think of it as Trumpaganda. ananda Jul 30 #40
This is due to a downturn in imports and an uptick Phoenix61 Jul 30 #2
The reported GDP numbers are inflation-adjusted, that's why it's called "real GDP" progree Jul 30 #24
Flipped. Igel Jul 30 #42
Maybe for the upper class................. Lovie777 Jul 30 #3
And people that i know of, losing their jobs LisaL Jul 30 #14
Well, that's what's important, isn't it? OldBaldy1701E Jul 30 #41
Sure it did Bluestocking Jul 30 #4
And the inflation indicator was much lower than forecast FBaggins Jul 30 #5
According to who? Miguelito Loveless Jul 30 #6
The Bureau of Economic Analysis FBaggins Jul 30 #10
No part of the government is independent anymore. NutmegYankee Jul 30 #15
Thank you for pointing out the facts, even if they run counter to the rampant confirmation bias on full display here. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 30 #18
We're consistent here: Good economic numbers result in endless charges of "cooked books" and "Krasnov manipulation" progree Jul 30 #29
So, no one there Miguelito Loveless Jul 30 #33
Yes... you're being paranoid FBaggins Jul 30 #36
I don't remember the "previous 3.7%", but you are right -- progree Jul 30 #26
A cooked book diversion from epstein Javaman Jul 30 #7
Not cooked, not a diversion though it was seized upon by cheerleader-in-chief Hassett, number one economics toady Bernardo de La Paz Jul 30 #32
Marketwatch warned yesterday that the GDP number would be high, but not because economy is great progree Jul 30 #37
I am nor rooting against the U.S. economy. n/t speak easy Jul 30 #8
I'm not rooting against the economy but...there have been warnings from economists about book-cooking Maeve Jul 30 #9
Warnings only. None of them say it is occurring. None of them distrust the figures at this point. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 30 #22
Of course, the media is ALL over this. So eager to give the orange asshole some credit. hamsterjill Jul 30 #11
I am having trouble believing it as well. LisaL Jul 30 #12
I retired this spring from a national homebuilding company hamsterjill Jul 30 #16
Bullshit! The RMVP was more belivable than our current commerce department. NutmegYankee Jul 30 #13
Cynicism blinds many people. A form of confirmation bias. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 30 #17
Maybe it would be easier to believe LisaL Jul 30 #19
There are legitimate reasons why the figure is up even while you see anecdotal evidence against it Bernardo de La Paz Jul 30 #20
I am living the "anecdotal evidence." LisaL Jul 30 #21
Yeah, the economy is not homogeneous so it's can be hard to reconcile sometimes. unblock Jul 30 #25
Yeah, I have access to a lot of private business data, and what we're seeing aligns with decent gdp growth unblock Jul 30 #23
Frontrunning tariffs with imports juiced the numbers bucolic_frolic Jul 30 #27
If "they" tell you things are good then by god things are good - next question? walkingman Jul 30 #28
Statistics coming out of this administration are not credible Ritabert Jul 30 #30
Yet the price gouging at the kitchen table continues. I have yet to see a any type of relief from grocery prices Cheezoholic Jul 30 #31
I keep waiting for the economic problems that were forecast during the Trump presidency, where are they in the numbers? dem4decades Jul 30 #34
The last CPI report was kinda hot, and people here took it as confirmation that tariffs and immigrant labor shortages progree Jul 30 #38
Fake news Rebl2 Jul 30 #35

JMCKUSICK

(3,745 posts)
1. Am I supposed to believe that?
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:35 AM
Jul 30

I'm sorry but all he does is lie, I'd fully expect he would have everyone else do it too.

mdbl

(7,228 posts)
39. Always my first response. How do you believe a bunch of liars?
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 12:14 PM
Jul 30

Last edited Thu Jul 31, 2025, 07:04 AM - Edit history (1)

Phoenix61

(18,535 posts)
2. This is due to a downturn in imports and an uptick
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:38 AM
Jul 30

That uptick couldn’t possibly be due to everything being more expensive because of the tariffs could it? Talk about cooking the books.

progree

(12,248 posts)
24. The reported GDP numbers are inflation-adjusted, that's why it's called "real GDP"
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:18 AM
Jul 30

"Real" means inflation-adjusted in BEA and BLS-speak
https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 3.0 percent in the second quarter of 2025 (April, May, and June), according to the advance estimate released by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the first quarter, real GDP decreased 0.5 percent. The increase in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected a decrease in imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, and an increase in consumer spending. These movements were partly offset by decreases in investment and exports.


https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-2nd-quarter-2025-advance-estimate


Real GDP and Related Measures
(Percent change from Q1 to Q2)

Real GDP 3.0
Current-dollar GDP 5.0
Real final sales to private domestic purchasers 1.2
Gross domestic purchases price index 1.9
PCE price index 2.1
PCE price index excluding food and energy 2.5

Igel

(37,072 posts)
42. Flipped.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 02:28 PM
Jul 30

They subtracted imports from US output/product for 1Q, which soared in anticipation of tariffs and "gut loading" the supply chains with all kinds of yummy things.

In 2Q imports dropped off, so there was less to subtract and the remainder was larger.

Given the imbalance, until further notice the best we can do on the fly is take the average of the two. It's wrong--there were some underlying issues in 1Q.

Lovie777

(19,936 posts)
3. Maybe for the upper class.................
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:42 AM
Jul 30

not where I am tho. Prices are getting ridiculous. Veggies are not in good shape, etc.

And the eggs are still too damn high.

FBaggins

(28,392 posts)
5. And the inflation indicator was much lower than forecast
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:53 AM
Jul 30

2.1% vs 2.5% (both down from the previous 3.7%)

Miguelito Loveless

(5,153 posts)
6. According to who?
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 08:55 AM
Jul 30

All economic news from government agencies is now suspect due to purges of "non-loyalists"

FBaggins

(28,392 posts)
10. The Bureau of Economic Analysis
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:19 AM
Jul 30

Which remains largely independent of the administration's tentacles.

The current head was appointed in 2022.

NutmegYankee

(16,444 posts)
15. No part of the government is independent anymore.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:29 AM
Jul 30

Last edited Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:15 AM - Edit history (1)

The fear is real, even if people were there before January. Say the wrong thing and you are instantly fired.

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,772 posts)
18. Thank you for pointing out the facts, even if they run counter to the rampant confirmation bias on full display here. nt
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:50 AM
Jul 30

progree

(12,248 posts)
29. We're consistent here: Good economic numbers result in endless charges of "cooked books" and "Krasnov manipulation"
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:35 AM
Jul 30

Bad economic numbers, like the last CPI report was taken as proof that tariffs and labor shortages were re-igniting inflation. And the disastrous May retail sales report (minus 0.9%) also was accepted as proof that the economy was falling apart. None of these threads got any responses about book-cooking or manipulation.

Please give us credit for being consistent

Miguelito Loveless

(5,153 posts)
33. So, no one there
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:50 AM
Jul 30

is massaging numbers to avoid Trump firing them? Also, there sources of data are uncorrupted?

Not being paranoid, but the times call for massive skepticism about any "official" government pronouncement.

FBaggins

(28,392 posts)
36. Yes... you're being paranoid
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 11:11 AM
Jul 30

That isn’t proof that it isn’t happening… but there also isn’t any evidence that it is.

Keep in mind that this isn’t a black box with “3.0%… trust us” on the side. The report is quite detailed and breaks things down to very granular categories. It would be nearly impossible to make things up without getting caught

progree

(12,248 posts)
26. I don't remember the "previous 3.7%", but you are right --
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:24 AM
Jul 30
https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-2nd-quarter-2025-advance-estimate
The price index for gross domestic purchases increased 1.9 percent in the second quarter, compared with an increase of 3.4 percent in the first quarter. The personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index increased 2.1 percent, compared with an increase of 3.7 percent. Excluding food and energy prices, the PCE price index increased 2.5 percent, compared with an increase of 3.5 percent.
(emphasis added)

Javaman

(64,416 posts)
7. A cooked book diversion from epstein
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:11 AM
Jul 30

DT:We grew bigly, so bigly the best ever bigly in the history of the United States, because of me. Nobody have grown it more bigly than me ever. I’ll take questions

He preens as he waits for the first question

Reporter with a spine (probably from Scotland): sir, is this a tactic to sever your attention from your involvement with Epstein and not releasing the client list?

DT: you are a nasty man. Press thingy is over i have gol..work to do!!!

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,772 posts)
32. Not cooked, not a diversion though it was seized upon by cheerleader-in-chief Hassett, number one economics toady
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:50 AM
Jul 30

From MarketWatch:

Key details: The trade deficit had the biggest influence by far on GDP. A plunging deficit added a whopping 5 percentage points to U.S. growth.

Had trade been neutral, GDP could have shown a decline.

By contrast, a record trade deficit shaved a record 4.6 percentage points off GDP in the first quarter. That lead to the first decline since early 2022.

"Tariffs are complicating the interpretation of economic data, and the GDP figures are just the latest example," said Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet.


Averaging the two quarters yields 1.25%, which would be considered weak if times were normal.

progree

(12,248 posts)
37. Marketwatch warned yesterday that the GDP number would be high, but not because economy is great
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 11:16 AM
Jul 30

Last edited Wed Jul 30, 2025, 11:53 AM - Edit history (1)

GDP is ready to pop, but not because the U.S. economy is popping, Marketwatch, 7/29/25
(remember, this is well-before the release of today's GDP report)
https://archive.ph/LPmfZ

By the way the last and final estimate of Q1 GDP was minus 0.2%.
So, averaging the two quarters together: -0.2% and +3.0% = 2.8%/2 = 1.4%


Edit I was wrong about Q1 GDP, it is reported as minus 0.5% in today's release

https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-2nd-quarter-2025-advance-estimate
and https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

So, like you say, the 2 quarters average to just 1.25%

Maeve

(43,302 posts)
9. I'm not rooting against the economy but...there have been warnings from economists about book-cooking
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:17 AM
Jul 30

And you can trust this mis-administration about as far as you can spit a rat

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,772 posts)
22. Warnings only. None of them say it is occurring. None of them distrust the figures at this point. . . . nt
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:05 AM
Jul 30

hamsterjill

(16,399 posts)
11. Of course, the media is ALL over this. So eager to give the orange asshole some credit.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:19 AM
Jul 30

This is bullshit. Every business that I know is hurting. I can't go to the grocery store for more than five items without paying at least $100, and the housing market in South Texas is about to tank.

Insurance costs are out of this world, medical care is harder to find. There is NOTHING good about this administration, and I resent the media trying to sugar coat what's going on.

Sound pissed off? Yep, that's my attitude since the asshole was put back in control.

LisaL

(47,322 posts)
12. I am having trouble believing it as well.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:26 AM
Jul 30

In my field, a lot of people are losing their jobs.

hamsterjill

(16,399 posts)
16. I retired this spring from a national homebuilding company
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:31 AM
Jul 30

They are laying people off right and left in our area. Employees are stressed and worried.

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,772 posts)
17. Cynicism blinds many people. A form of confirmation bias.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:44 AM
Jul 30

Figures run your way? Big news.
Figures run against you? Don't believe them! Corrupt!

There are plenty of reasons the numbers have come out the way they have and they can be discovered by digging a bit deeper. But very few here dare question their own confirmation bias.

LisaL

(47,322 posts)
19. Maybe it would be easier to believe
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:51 AM
Jul 30

if I saw any evidence of this so-called improvement in the economy around me. All i see is prices are getting higher and people I know of, are losing jobs.

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,772 posts)
20. There are legitimate reasons why the figure is up even while you see anecdotal evidence against it
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:02 AM
Jul 30

There is evidence in the data that the job market is fraying a little bit at the edges, but it is not yet heavy. The change (second derivative) in inflation (first derivative) has ticked up one tenth of one percent.

The GDP figures dropped Q1 because of tariff expectations and gyrations. Q2 is the mirror. Both cases are aberrations because of uncertainty and tariff turmoil. Neither is as indicative as would be in normal times. Neither has been jiggered.

unblock

(55,575 posts)
25. Yeah, the economy is not homogeneous so it's can be hard to reconcile sometimes.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:21 AM
Jul 30

Unemployment is still very low, but try finding a tech job these days as AI is leading to major layoffs, just as one example.

I think the figures are probably pretty close to the aggregate reality, but the good news may well be temporary.

unblock

(55,575 posts)
23. Yeah, I have access to a lot of private business data, and what we're seeing aligns with decent gdp growth
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:16 AM
Jul 30

I can't be precise enough to confirm 3.0% growth exactly, but I'm seeing a modest bump in sales and am certainly no longer in recession watch like I was 3-4 months ago.

The markets and to a lesser extent businesses are largely ignoring the tariff noise because Donnie has lost all credibility with his massive pronouncements followed by massive retreats and delays and exceptions.

More uncertainty is in the inflation numbers, I have less private visibility into this. Gas prices seem to have backed off a little and that might be driving the better figures, which means it may be temporary.

bucolic_frolic

(52,100 posts)
27. Frontrunning tariffs with imports juiced the numbers
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:28 AM
Jul 30

even allowing for real adjustments.

Plus it's summer and MAGA Americans are spending more because they are so happy that brainy people are unemployed.

walkingman

(9,725 posts)
28. If "they" tell you things are good then by god things are good - next question?
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:30 AM
Jul 30

Remember the band with Steve Winwood; Eric Clapton; Ginger Baker, Ric Grech ?....BLIND FAITH!!

Cheezoholic

(3,252 posts)
31. Yet the price gouging at the kitchen table continues. I have yet to see a any type of relief from grocery prices
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 10:49 AM
Jul 30

utility bills, basic insurance costs. Gas is a bit cheaper but it always is this time of year, that's about it. They (anyone in office) can toss these economic number's around all they want. The people I talk to, MAGA or not, when they sit down at the table at the end of the month to pay bills they are still struggling overall.

That's the most important number right there period.

dem4decades

(13,128 posts)
34. I keep waiting for the economic problems that were forecast during the Trump presidency, where are they in the numbers?
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 11:08 AM
Jul 30

I get it, prices haven't gone down, but why haven't the inflation numbers gone up? I understand Trump cooks the books but the numbers should be somewhere other than the price of coffee and toys.

progree

(12,248 posts)
38. The last CPI report was kinda hot, and people here took it as confirmation that tariffs and immigrant labor shortages
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 11:33 AM
Jul 30

were re-igniting inflation.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143496078

We get a look at PCE inflation for June tomorrow, the Fed's favorite gauge. I don't expect it to be as high as the CPI report was, because it seldom is. That's partly or mostly because the PCE is a "chained" index which means that, for example, if enough consumers switch from beef to turkey necks and other lower-cost kinds of meat, then it will show up as a decrease in meat prices in the PCE. That's because chained types of indices fully include substitution effects.

One other thing comes to mind: the PCE puts LESS weight on shelter than the CPI does. Shelter increases have been high relative to most other components, so this tends to make the PCE come out lower than the CPI.

The estimate for tomorrow's PCE June over May increases are +0.3% for both the regular and the core numbers (those are about 3.6% when annualized, which is kinda hot), but I doubt they will be that high, again because of the substitution effect.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. economy grew at a 3%...