Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(166,964 posts)
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 03:21 PM 20 hrs ago

Supreme Court sets date to consider whether to review Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal

Source: Deadline: Legal Blog

The Supreme Court has officially set a date — Sept. 29 — to consider at a private conference whether it will review Ghislaine Maxwell’s challenge to her sex trafficking convictions.

This typical scheduling development might not normally be relevant to national political news. But Maxwell is at the center of a controversy stemming from the Trump administration’s refusal to release all information related to Jeffrey Epstein, the late disgraced financier. Maxwell was convicted of conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse minors.

Indeed, her lawyers referenced her pending petition in a letter Tuesday to the U.S. House Oversight Committee. Responding to the committee’s bid to depose her, the lawyers said they wanted to put off any congressional testimony until after her petition is resolved (or if President Donald Trump grants her clemency first).

To be clear, this scheduling development is normal. It might be the only normal thing to happen in the Epstein saga. All it means is that the justices will consider her petition alongside others as the court returns from summer break ahead of the new term that starts in October.

Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-ghislaine-maxwell-review-private-conference-rcna221981



Supreme Court sets date to consider whether to review Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal - MSNBC

apple.news/AufAYOJLCSMu...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-07-30T18:14:20.966Z
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court sets date to consider whether to review Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 20 hrs ago OP
Normal Smilo 20 hrs ago #1
What??? chelsea0011 20 hrs ago #2
She filed a petition for certiorari raising a legal issue. onenote 19 hrs ago #5
NOTHING is normal with this fucking court bluestarone 19 hrs ago #3
All that is being considered is a petition for certiorari. SOP onenote 19 hrs ago #6
Isn't This Caused By The Recent Supreme Court Ruling DallasNE 14 hrs ago #15
No. onenote 12 hrs ago #16
This guarantees the story will continue to have legs 303squadron 19 hrs ago #4
Just for the record, WHO decided? bluestarone 19 hrs ago #7
The shadow docket knows.............. turbinetree 19 hrs ago #8
This isn't a shadow docket case. Its a run of the mill petition for certiorari -- onenote 18 hrs ago #10
Thanks............. turbinetree 17 hrs ago #14
Nothing was decided. It was a standard administrative move scheduling the conference at which the petition onenote 18 hrs ago #9
Your right, i do nopt understand how Supreme court works, BUT bluestarone 18 hrs ago #11
No. A decision on whether to hear her case won't be made until September when the court considers her petition onenote 17 hrs ago #12
TYVM! I always thought before any decision a judge had to decide to hear a case. bluestarone 17 hrs ago #13
So repubs want to have Hornedfrog2000 5 hrs ago #17
Not what the case is about. And the administration has opposed her petition for cert. onenote 3 hrs ago #19
How does Jughead 3 hrs ago #18
Average Americans file petitions for cert all the time. Around 8000 to 10,000 per year. onenote 2 hrs ago #20
I wonder if any of the Supremes have visited any Epstein properties? 70sEraVet 2 hrs ago #21
The appropriate parties will be paid dlk 59 min ago #22

onenote

(45,511 posts)
5. She filed a petition for certiorari raising a legal issue.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 04:07 PM
19 hrs ago

This isn't the court being proactive. It's the court following SOP.

bluestarone

(19,998 posts)
3. NOTHING is normal with this fucking court
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 03:51 PM
19 hrs ago

NOTHING. This should never even be heard. THAT would have been normal.

onenote

(45,511 posts)
6. All that is being considered is a petition for certiorari. SOP
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 04:11 PM
19 hrs ago

Maybe you're not familiar with Supreme Court procedures.

Maxwell filed a petition for certiorari arguing that there is a split in the circuits on a legal issue key to her case -- whether a non-prosecution agreement entered into in one district is binding on other districts.

Petitions for cert are considered in conferences held by the justices. Most are denied. A relatively small number are granted.

If the court denies her petition for cert -- something the Trump administration has argued it should do -- Maxwell loses and she stays in prison. If the court grants her petition, the standard operating procedure would be for the court to schedule briefing and oral argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that in the end they will rule in her favor. The Court not infrequently affirms an appellate decision after granting cert to consider an appeal.

DallasNE

(7,831 posts)
15. Isn't This Caused By The Recent Supreme Court Ruling
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 09:23 PM
14 hrs ago

That means rulings by a District Court Judge in many cases do not apply in all 50 States, so the Supreme Court has to revisit and clarify its recent ruling. Who didn't see that coming?

onenote

(45,511 posts)
10. This isn't a shadow docket case. Its a run of the mill petition for certiorari --
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 05:27 PM
18 hrs ago

and whether it will be granted or denied will be decided at conference. Even if it is granted -- not a far fetched idea since the case raises a specific legal question on which the circuits are split, which often is the basis for granting cert -- it doesn't mean that the case, after being scheduled for briefing and argument -- won't result in the court affirming the appeals court decision that Maxwell is challenging.

onenote

(45,511 posts)
9. Nothing was decided. It was a standard administrative move scheduling the conference at which the petition
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 05:24 PM
18 hrs ago

will be considered -- along with any number of other petitions.

Again, I'm going to assume you simply don't know how Supreme Court procedure works.

bluestarone

(19,998 posts)
11. Your right, i do nopt understand how Supreme court works, BUT
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 05:30 PM
18 hrs ago

My question was did a judge decide to hear her case? If not ok, but if one did, who was it?

onenote

(45,511 posts)
12. No. A decision on whether to hear her case won't be made until September when the court considers her petition
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 05:51 PM
17 hrs ago

At that time, if four of the nine decide the case is "cert-worthy" they will schedule it for briefing and oral argument after which a decision on the merits will be reached. They will probably announce whether they will hear his case -- along with a number of other cases that are scheduled for conference in late September -- when the new court session begins in October.

bluestarone

(19,998 posts)
13. TYVM! I always thought before any decision a judge had to decide to hear a case.
Wed Jul 30, 2025, 06:03 PM
17 hrs ago

I apologize, but i'm so upset to see what's happening to our country. so upset!

Jughead

(99 posts)
18. How does
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 07:45 AM
3 hrs ago

The average American sitting in jail get a looksie appeal from the Supreme Court?
I mean come on.

onenote

(45,511 posts)
20. Average Americans file petitions for cert all the time. Around 8000 to 10,000 per year.
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 08:34 AM
2 hrs ago

Of these, around 1200 pay the required $300 filing fee. Most of the rest are filed "in forma pauperis" and the fee is waived. Only around 80 to 100 petitions are granted per year, with the rest being denied.

70sEraVet

(4,701 posts)
21. I wonder if any of the Supremes have visited any Epstein properties?
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 09:06 AM
2 hrs ago

Clarence seems like he might have 'taken advantage'.

dlk

(12,804 posts)
22. The appropriate parties will be paid
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 10:34 AM
59 min ago

And Maxwell will ultimately be released, unfortunately.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court sets date t...