Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!
I have
DU friends
everywhere.
Rebellions
are built
on HOPE
DU
keeps
HOPE
alive
Thank you
EarlG
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional
Source: CBS News
August 1, 2025 / 10:28 PM EDT
The Supreme Court has teed up a major case for next term on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional.
In a Friday night scheduling order, the high court asked parties to file briefs on whether Louisiana's creation of a second majority-minority House seat violates the 14th or 15th Amendments. The question could significantly curtail efforts to force states to create majority-minority congressional districts.
The order is part of a case from the 2024 term regarding Louisiana's congressional map that justices decided to hold over for re-argument. The justices set a deadline of Aug. 27 for briefs to be filed by appellants on the question. Reply briefs are due Oct. 3, the Friday before the beginning of the 2025 session.
In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments over Louisiana's congressional map that was approved by the state's GOP-led legislature and created a second majority-Black district. An order from the court issued on the last day of the 2024 term restored the case to its calendar for reargument. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the move to order more arguments and said the court should have decided the case. The move meant the state's map with two majority-Black districts would remain intact for now.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-louisiana-case-racial-whether-racial-redistricting-unconstitutional/
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143333748
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143368986
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143423048
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143486882
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143504926
(June 27, 2025 ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-109_l53m.pdf)

underpants
(192,325 posts)Expanding your workforce and market (DEI) is racist.
Okay. Ill be outside watching the squirrels and the chipmunks
Lovie777
(19,838 posts)FBaggins
(28,384 posts)We can essentially count on losing one more seat in the House
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,351 posts)FBaggins
(28,384 posts)I think the case is primarily about LA being required to add a second minority-majority district (essentially guranteeing a second blue seat). It isn't that the state isn't red enough to go 6-0 (without even odd-looking districts) if the VRA continues its demise... but I'm not sure that even this court can do more than tell the state they are allowed to use the lines they drew before the court order.
They might be able to get away with moving to 6-0 after the 2030 census - but hopefully the courts have shifted by then.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,351 posts)...is that it won't apply just to Louisiana...if they gut the provision of the VRA that allows racial gerrymandering for majority-minority districts, it will apply everywhere. Think Alabama, NC, Georgia, etc.
*Changed to clarify that it isn't a mandate.
SunSeeker
(56,502 posts)bluestarone
(20,126 posts)Anything they can do to help RETHUGS CHEAT!!