Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Pick Your
Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
You still
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!

I have
DU friends
everywhere.



Rebellions
are built
on HOPE




DU
keeps
HOPE
alive


Thank you

EarlG

Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

BumRushDaShow

(158,625 posts)
Sat Aug 2, 2025, 09:49 AM Aug 2

Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional

Source: CBS News

August 1, 2025 / 10:28 PM EDT


The Supreme Court has teed up a major case for next term on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional.

In a Friday night scheduling order, the high court asked parties to file briefs on whether Louisiana's creation of a second majority-minority House seat violates the 14th or 15th Amendments. The question could significantly curtail efforts to force states to create majority-minority congressional districts.

The order is part of a case from the 2024 term regarding Louisiana's congressional map that justices decided to hold over for re-argument. The justices set a deadline of Aug. 27 for briefs to be filed by appellants on the question. Reply briefs are due Oct. 3, the Friday before the beginning of the 2025 session.

In June, the Supreme Court ordered further arguments over Louisiana's congressional map that was approved by the state's GOP-led legislature and created a second majority-Black district. An order from the court issued on the last day of the 2024 term restored the case to its calendar for reargument. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the move to order more arguments and said the court should have decided the case. The move meant the state's map with two majority-Black districts would remain intact for now.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-louisiana-case-racial-whether-racial-redistricting-unconstitutional/



REFERENCES

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143333748
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143368986
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143423048
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143486882
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143504926

(June 27, 2025 ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-109_l53m.pdf)
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court tees up Louisiana case on whether racial redistricting is unconstitutional (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 2 OP
So not being racist is racist now huh? underpants Aug 2 #1
-0- trust in those RW 6 justices................. Lovie777 Aug 2 #2
With good reason FBaggins Aug 2 #3
At least one more n/t SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2 #5
That might be a bridge too far FBaggins Aug 2 #6
My take (and I'm not a lawyer)... SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2 #7
Not good. Looks like the Fascist Six are far from done eviscerating the Voting Rights Act. nt SunSeeker Aug 2 #4
THIS bunch is always looking for RETHUG LOOPHOLES!! bluestarone Aug 2 #8
Going.......backwards!!! 😑😬😬 electric_blue68 Aug 2 #9

underpants

(192,325 posts)
1. So not being racist is racist now huh?
Sat Aug 2, 2025, 10:04 AM
Aug 2

Expanding your workforce and market (DEI) is racist.

Okay. I’ll be outside watching the squirrels and the chipmunks

FBaggins

(28,384 posts)
6. That might be a bridge too far
Sat Aug 2, 2025, 04:16 PM
Aug 2

I think the case is primarily about LA being required to add a second minority-majority district (essentially guranteeing a second blue seat). It isn't that the state isn't red enough to go 6-0 (without even odd-looking districts) if the VRA continues its demise... but I'm not sure that even this court can do more than tell the state they are allowed to use the lines they drew before the court order.

They might be able to get away with moving to 6-0 after the 2030 census - but hopefully the courts have shifted by then.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,351 posts)
7. My take (and I'm not a lawyer)...
Sat Aug 2, 2025, 04:19 PM
Aug 2

...is that it won't apply just to Louisiana...if they gut the provision of the VRA that allows racial gerrymandering for majority-minority districts, it will apply everywhere. Think Alabama, NC, Georgia, etc.

*Changed to clarify that it isn't a mandate.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court tees up Lou...