Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I`m calling
out YOU:
MAGA repugs,
complicit
MSM,
+ corporate
sycophants
And how many
times can a
man turn his
head, and
pretend that
he just
doesn`t see?

STUPID
is
as
TSF
Does
An island of
Sanity
In a sea of
Insanity


Mirt!
Mirt!
Mirt!
Thank you
for taking
out the
dirt!

AMERICA
LOVE IT
OR
FIX IT

Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

BumRushDaShow

(158,592 posts)
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 04:05 AM Aug 3

Senate GOP readies 'nuclear' option, set for August break after nominations deal falls apart

Source: The Hill

08/02/25 8:37 PM ET


The Senate is set to finally begin its August recess without a deal on nominations as Republicans are intent on moving forward with a rules change to limit length of time spent on individual nominees enable President Trump’s selections to be confirmed more expeditiously due to a Democratic blockade.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had been trading offers throughout Friday night and Saturday. However, they were unable to seal the deal on a package that would have allowed roughly two dozen nominees to be approved before the month-long August break, which lawmakers have been anxious for.

In exchange for allowing the group of non-controversial nominees to be approved, Schumer had been pushing for billions of dollars of restored funding in foreign aid and for the National Institutes of Health. Trump, however, made clear that he would not throw his weight behind that agreement.

“Senator Cryin’ Chuck Schumer is demanding over One Billion Dollars in order to approve a small number of our highly qualified nominees, who should right now be helping to run our Country. This demand is egregious and unprecedented, and would be embarrassing to the Republican Party if it were accepted,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/5433989-senate-gop-nuclear-option-failed-nominations/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

thucythucy

(8,975 posts)
1. And every time Democrats held the Senate
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 12:48 PM
Aug 3

we refused to use the nuclear option, even as the GOP blocked all our nominees, because... tradition?

Decorum?

Because "if we do it, then they'll do it too?"

As if anything would stop the GOP from doing whatever it wants once they have the power.

When oh when will we ever learn?

Prairie Gates

(5,946 posts)
3. This is actually a moment to praise Schumer and the Senate Dems
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 01:02 PM
Aug 3

I know, I know. It's hard, and people are used to the default attack option, but Schumer is really doing good on this nominee thing, and forcing the GOP to abandon their own rules is a good use of leverage.

Breath in. Breath out. Give kudos to Schumer here. You can do it, I promise.

thucythucy

(8,975 posts)
6. Doing good work now doesn't negate the neglect to do
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 10:17 AM
Aug 4

good work then, and when it might have made much more of a difference.

I'm hoping the various elements of the leadership have learned their lesson, and I suppose better late than never.

As for "breathe in breathe out"--people I know and love are at direct risk entirely because of this administration.

Canceling cancer clinical trials is going to make it very difficult for at least one of my dear friends to breathe at all.

BumRushDaShow

(158,592 posts)
4. Technically in this case
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 01:43 PM
Aug 3

with respect to "nominations", the "nuclear option" was already invoked under Obama by Reid (and expanded under 45 by Turtle).

I think in this case, they are talking about other things to "speed up the process", like "limiting debate" (which currently stands at 2 hours per nominee, equally divided IIRC).

thucythucy

(8,975 posts)
7. Thanks for the information, and I suppose I'm confusing things.
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 10:26 AM
Aug 4

If the nuclear option for judicial nominations was in place, how is it that Merrick Garland's nomination to the USSC never came up for a vote?

And I seem to recall quite a few nominees were left in limbo due to Republican stonewalling. For example:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/republican-senators-vow-to-block-future-biden-judicial-nominees

What am I missing here?

BumRushDaShow

(158,592 posts)
8. The "nuclear option" had to do with a "cloture vote" before the final vote
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 10:31 AM
Aug 4

At one time, all nominees required 60 votes before being considered for the final debate and vote. That was dispensed with.

In the case of Obama's nominees, Turtle simply "didn't schedule a vote at all", and sat on the nomination for 9 months, claiming that they needed to "wait until after the election to allow the next President to select the nominee".

THAT is the power of the Majority Leader of the Senate (and the GOP controlled the Senate at that time).

thucythucy

(8,975 posts)
9. Okay. Thank you for the clarification.
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 10:41 AM
Aug 4

Do you think I should delete my post?

It may be that your clarification may inform others as well, so perhaps not? I don't mind people knowing I've been mistaken,

BumRushDaShow

(158,592 posts)
10. No you should leave it
Mon Aug 4, 2025, 10:59 AM
Aug 4

If anything, the Rules of the Senate are obscenely obscure!

https://riddick.gpo.gov/

They even have bound copies! From Jeff Merkley a few years ago -




Senator Jeff Merkley
@SenJeffMerkley
·
Follow
Ready to continue the battle.
Photo of a table with a newspaper. On top of the newspaper, a blue book called “Riddick’s Senate Procedure.”
11:56 PM · Jan 19, 2022




Bayard

(26,571 posts)
2. He just feels like he can blather out anything on his own platform,
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 12:52 PM
Aug 3

Insults, wackazoid ideas, or random musings.

24 nominees. I'm sure they are the Best People.

Karasu

(1,851 posts)
5. Republicans are the last people on Earth who get to complain about stonewalling nominees, and they want to change the
Sun Aug 3, 2025, 02:47 PM
Aug 3

fucking rules just for this fucking regime, as per usual.

Fuck them.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate GOP readies 'nucle...