There was nothing wrong with the site and the specific deletions raise plenty of suspicion. Traitors gonna do that traitor thing, no matter what.

to rewrite history and the laws of this country.

to shut this building down here in Philly -



They just got a giant donation a couple months ago - National Constitution Center receives its largest donation ever

Plus a loaned original Constitution copy for display through next year's 250th celebration -



They even won a Guinness Book of World Records Title for a Drag Queen Story Time, that event held to kick off Pride Month this past June!

If it was a coding error, then there was a programmer. We need to find out who it was. I wonder if DOGE employees are doing side jobs?

who are given task orders written up by the COTRs overseeing the contract, and executed by Contract Officers, with descriptions of any changes/updates that need to be done. The contractors generally use some kind of CMS to do this so it's plug and play.

The COTR is *supposed to* review/approve the changes of the revised page(s) (usually looking at it on a "development/test" instance) BEFORE it is transferred to the "live/production" instance for publication.

So claiming some kind of "coding error" is a bullshit excuse.

Always disappearing on inconvenient sections.

Some overzealous manager told them to get rid of everything "woke" on the Library of Congress site and they interpreted that as remove parts of the Constitution Trump doesn't like. So they started to do that but people noticed.

Not Sarcasm.

A coding error accidentally removing sections, sure. Coding errors can do wierd stuff. Those specific ones, considering the timing, eh, thats less believable.

Just because the overall look of the website hasn't changed doesn't mean the background code hasn't. Front end code and back end code dont always get along.

As long as its an actively maintained website. Security patches, server updates, OS updates, etc. Leaving code static on a public facing website is a great way for it to get hacked. Just because the actual text itself, the way it looks, and the overall design hasn't changed doesn't mean the mechanics of whats behind it doesn't as well.

Think of it like a car. You have a 20yo F150. That F150, from all outside lockers, looks just like it did when it rolled off the assembly line. Except its 20 years old, has a new transmission, rebuilt transfer case, seat covers over the ripped up seats, ans every bolt on component of the engine changed. From walking by the truck would you know that? No. Just because you dont see anything outwardly different doesn't mean the stuff under the hood had to be fixed.

If seemingly random sections were missing, then it would be plausible. Unlikely, but plausible. Considering what this admin is doing to gut the constitution figuratively and literally, this is an infantile excuse for getting caught pulling some CCP/Russian prop bullshit.

And appointed himself Librarian of Congress while no one was looking.

Uh huh

Don't know about AI computers.

I work heavily with content management systems, at the standards level. There is no way in hell that this was an "accidental" ommission, particularly since this code almost certainly predated Trump coming into office. It would be trivial, however, to comment out those particular sections if you were specifically wanting to convince your idiot supporters that concepts such as Habeas Corpus wasn't mentioned in Trump's "version" of the Constitution.

she laughed and said oh, ya.....

Yes, this IS a stupid "coding error". End of story!

Though absolutely worthy of ridiculing the Trump administration for, it is simply pathetic seriously calling this minor error an attempt to change the Constitution. The sloppy coding base is much older than the Trump administrations, and is the real culprit.

According to Google, there have only been a few discussions of the actual coding, none of them really going into the substance. And then there is ONE page actually making sense of this:

Problem is the explanation given doesn't explain why those specific sections were affected

... I can give you some more, since the Library now has explained that new links was made in a wrong way to the XML in the database - some added code without a proper end tag. Which is a type of error that has often occurred for any smallish webmaster like myself, even when I was highly paid as a System Developer with a very public facing webpage. Shit happens!

On July 22 the Constitution was simply totally missing, and it seems like the techies were fighting to get it back in shape. This is not just a simple webpage, since the basic text is served and reused in many forms with annotations, mirroring how judges are changing the interpretation over time.

And yes, they should have better trained brains looking and proofing this - but also under the last president these pages were temporarily coded badly and even went offline from time to time.

Right now the Trmp administration is trying hard to feed us all any kind of distractions, to keep energy away from the Epstein accusations. This wild discussion about a coding error is an example that people do not need his made up distractions - they will willingly waste time on other meaningless stuff of their own silly making...


BTW, under Biden the text of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment on that website was corrected from "The Congress shall have THE power to enforce" to "The Congress shall have power to enforce".

I have not researched much on when the THE came in, but it looks like TRMP DID IT and Biden got it corrected - you are welcome to start a new conspiracy theory on that!

Biden also changed "The Preamble ANNOTED" to "The Preamble EXPLAINED". None of Biden's adjustments has been changed this year under Trmp.

Translation: Screw the truth as long as we have a meritless excuse ready to pull out of our pockets that our idiot base will subscribe to.

Why was it just those?? Nope, this was some magat changing it to their desired version and what they will implement and what they won't. It was 100% no accident and anyone that believes that is a total fool!

This simply makes no sense, even by Trump standards.

First one he would pick would not be in the main Constitution, but those pesky amendments, as in
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States",
"Presidential Term Limits" and
"Unreasonable searches and seizures"
and many others...

... then why was the text:
"To raise and support Armies..."
kept in place, including this disclaimer:
"... no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years ..."

The next line (and a lot more) was cut out:
"To provide and maintain a Navy..."

Does Trmp only want an Army and not a Navy?
Even though he love the song "In The Navy" by Village People so much???

Stop this witch hunt .

...I expect better-quality lying from the Library of Congress.