Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Pick Your
Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
You still
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!

I have
DU friends
everywhere.



Rebellions
are built
on HOPE




DU
keeps
HOPE
alive


Thank you

EarlG

Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

BumRushDaShow

(158,625 posts)
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 06:16 AM Aug 7

Congress doesn't want to talk to Alex Acosta, Epstein's 'sweetheart deal' maker

Source: NBC News/Reuters

Aug. 6, 2025, 8:36 PM EDT


The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on Tuesday listed former attorneys general, a former FBI director, former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as people all subject to subpoenas for matters tied to Jeffrey Epstein.

However, not named in the news release was Alex Acosta — who was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida whose secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein created a spark that has turned into an inferno of controversy nearly 20 years later.

Acosta also was President Donald Trump's labor secretary during his first term. Acosta left the role in 2019 after he faced scrutiny over the Epstein plea agreement. Victims of Epstein’s sexual abuse are unhappy that Acosta was not among those subpoenaed.

“How can any genuine investigation into the federal government’s sweetheart deal with Epstein (including the extraordinary grant of blanket immunity to all his named and unnamed co-conspirators) omit Alex Acosta?” Epstein victim attorney Jack Scarola asked in a statement to NBC News.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/congress-doesnt-want-talk-alex-acosta-epsteins-sweetheart-deal-maker-rcna223543

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress doesn't want to talk to Alex Acosta, Epstein's 'sweetheart deal' maker (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 7 OP
House of clowns. Fucking ridiculous. Karasu Aug 7 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #23
Very odd Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #2
Why is it "odd"? BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #3
Odd... *wink* Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #17
I'd say it's more like VERY corrupt. Prof. Toru Tanaka Aug 7 #15
Well yes, could say that too. It is very corrupt. Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #16
The end of the article makes this even more infuriating. ariadne0614 Aug 7 #4
So why isn't the media hounding this dude with questions? Chasstev365 Aug 7 #5
Maybe because Magats have him holed up in an undisclosed safe house? gab13by13 Aug 7 #6
I just looked it up: Chasstev365 Aug 7 #7
Unbelievable, gab13by13 Aug 7 #9
Here is the link Chasstev365 Aug 7 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #24
Right?! Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #22
Wasn't Robert Garcia just elected by House Democrats to gab13by13 Aug 7 #8
Here is the webpage for the The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Democrats Press Releases BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #11
Good rundown Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #25
I think the House Oversight Committee should summer in California orchards Torchlight Aug 7 #12
Heh, indeed Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #19
Alex Acosta was told to lay off the case against Jeffrey Epstein FakeNoose Aug 7 #13
And who was the Attorney General during this time? BumRushDaShow Aug 7 #14
Who exactly told him to lay off and when? Funny how he never said those, right? Scott Alan Swaggerty Aug 7 #18
I don't think Julie K. Brown was ever told "who" gave Acosta the message FakeNoose Aug 7 #26
More info on Acosta that never seems to get reported Wiz Imp Aug 7 #27

Response to Karasu (Reply #1)

ariadne0614

(2,013 posts)
4. The end of the article makes this even more infuriating.
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 06:45 AM
Aug 7
The prosecutor at the time, Marie Villafana, was denied a meeting with Acosta by her immediate supervisors to explain her position and the strength of the case. She expressed her concerns and frustrations in an email to her supervisor at the time, Matt Menschel, about why an indictment was brought and why decisions were being made about a plea deal even after, she says, the U.S. attorney’s office reassured her it would not cave in to Epstein’s attorneys, the report says.

Acosta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

gab13by13

(29,460 posts)
6. Maybe because Magats have him holed up in an undisclosed safe house?
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 07:33 AM
Aug 7

Did he get another government job since he was canned as Secretary of Labor?

Chasstev365

(6,027 posts)
7. I just looked it up:
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 07:36 AM
Aug 7

Alex Acosta is now on the Board of Directors at, wait for it, Newsmax! I think he should be somewhat accessible.

gab13by13

(29,460 posts)
9. Unbelievable,
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 07:46 AM
Aug 7

the fact that he is now a top dog at Newsmax should be reported by the MSM, but I have heard nothing about this. Never mind, I'm dreaming again.

Response to Chasstev365 (Reply #10)

Response to Chasstev365 (Reply #5)

gab13by13

(29,460 posts)
8. Wasn't Robert Garcia just elected by House Democrats to
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 07:43 AM
Aug 7

be the ranking member of the Oversight committee? The vote where Jasmine Crockett finished 4th? What does he has to say about these subpoenas? Guessing that he and the rest of the committee voted against subpoenaing the Clintons? How about subpoenaing the head of the federal Bureau of prisons? Maxwell is the first ever sex offender to serve her sentence in a minimum security prison in Bryan, maybe in any minimum security prison? Garcia stated on TV that he sent a stern letter to the head of the federal bureau of prisons asking why Maxwell was transferred. The reporter asked him what if he gets no response, his answer was that his committee is subpoenaing people to testify, he wasn't talking about the Clintons I'm sure.

BumRushDaShow

(158,625 posts)
11. Here is the webpage for the The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Democrats Press Releases
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 08:32 AM
Aug 7
https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases

Ranking Members Robert Garcia and Summer Lee Statement After Forcing House GOP to Subpoena Epstein Files


Per an AP article (where the media carefully BURIED the names of some of the OTHERS subpoenaed) -

House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files and depositions with the Clintons

By STEPHEN GROVES
Updated 1:55 PM EDT, August 5, 2025


(snip)

The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last four presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Lawmakers also subpoenaed former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller.

(snip)


Over all these years, this is the first time I have heard Jeff Sessions mentioned anywhere. He was 45's AG for the first 2 years of his first term (Feb. 2017 - Nov. 2018) and after all the "recusals" he did, the Elf finally left and hid in a tree.

But the media and their headlines chose to highlight the Clintons and IGNORE the people as far back as Gonzales, who was AG under Shrub in 2005 - 2007 when the Epstein investigation began in earnest and arrests were made, and ignored Mike Mukasey, who took over as AG after Gonzales left (and I would HOPE he was on the subpoena list) -

A timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, now 20 years old

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Updated 6:47 PM EDT, July 23, 2025

(snip)

Here is a timeline of the criminal cases against Epstein and his former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for helping him abuse teenage girls.

___

(snip)

May 2006: Palm Beach police officials sign paperwork to charge Epstein with multiple counts of unlawful sex with a minor, but the county’s top prosecutor, State Attorney Barry Krischer, takes the unusual step of sending the case to a grand jury.

July 2006: Epstein is arrested after a grand jury indicts him on a single count of soliciting prostitution. The relatively minor charge draws almost immediate attention from critics, including Palm Beach police leaders, who assail Krischer publicly and accuse him of giving Epstein special treatment. The FBI begins an investigation.

2007: Federal prosecutors prepare an indictment against Epstein. But for a year, the money manager’s lawyers engage in talks with the U.S. attorney in Miami, Alexander Acosta, about a plea bargain that would allow Epstein to avoid a federal prosecution. Epstein’s lawyers decry his accusers as unreliable witnesses.

June 2008: Epstein pleads guilty to state charges: one count of solicitating prostitution and one count of soliciting prostitution from someone under the age of 18. He is sentenced to 18 months in jail. Under a secret arrangement, the U.S. attorney’s office agrees not to prosecute Epstein for federal crimes. Epstein serves most of his sentence in a work-release program that allows him to leave jail during the day to go to his office, then return at night.

(snip)


(I blame you for this! )

Response to gab13by13 (Reply #8)

Torchlight

(5,364 posts)
12. I think the House Oversight Committee should summer in California orchards
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 08:38 AM
Aug 7

They seem so skilled at cherry picking.

FakeNoose

(38,335 posts)
13. Alex Acosta was told to lay off the case against Jeffrey Epstein
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 08:41 AM
Aug 7

That's why Epstein got the "sweetheart" deal and the other female victims were unable to join the case. I read about this in Julie K. Brown's coverage in the Miami Herald, when she investigated the matter a few years ago. (It was a series of 3 newspaper articles, and now she has published a book.)

So the US intelligence community needs to answer for this - why did the CIA visit Alex Acosta in 2007 and tell him that Epstein was a spy for Mossad? Acosta couldn't drop the case but he gave Epstein the sweetest of deals that amounted to a slap on the wrist. It was presented to the judge as a done deal, and it prevented other victims from filing charges against Epstein.

FakeNoose

(38,335 posts)
26. I don't think Julie K. Brown was ever told "who" gave Acosta the message
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 10:04 AM
Aug 7

She says it was US intelligence, without naming anyone in particular. Either she never got the name, or she did and she can't publish it.

I haven't read her book, but it's on my list. (It's a very long one!) Meanwhile I'm relying on my memory of her newspaper articles that were published about 2 or 3 years ago.

Wiz Imp

(6,655 posts)
27. More info on Acosta that never seems to get reported
Thu Aug 7, 2025, 10:24 AM
Aug 7
https://katherineclark.house.gov/2019/7/salon-after-giving-epstein-deal-of-a-lifetime-alex-acosta-tried-to-slash-anti-trafficking-program
Acosta’s Labor Department budget proposal for fiscal year 2020 proposed slashing the budget of the International Labor Affairs Bureau (ILAB) by nearly 80 percent. The agency is charged with combating human trafficking, child labor and forced labor in the United States and around the world.

After Clark and Acosta both agreed that more needed to be done to combat trafficking, Clark pointed out that Acosta had also “proposed a budget cut, almost 80 percent, 79 percent to ILAB where this work is done, bringing its budget from $68 million to just $18.5 million.”

“I’m sure you’ve come prepared to justify this cut to us but it doesn’t go unnoticed that this isn’t the first time that you’ve ignored human trafficking,” Clark said. “Your office found that there had been a sexual abuse pyramid scheme that involved at least 36 underage girls. … Mr. Epstein raped and recruited these girls … and there is evidence that he allowed his friends to do the same.”

“Epstein should have been looking at a sentence of 366 years at a minimum. But that’s not what happened,” Clark continued. “How can we expect you, the labor secretary, to fight for American workers if you couldn't even fight for these girls?”


https://katherineclark.house.gov/2019/4/washington-post-acosta-confronted-by-lawmakers-over-plea-deal-in-jeffrey-epstein-sexual-misconduct-case#:~:text=Acosta%20responded%20that%20human%20trafficking,and%20the%20victims%20received%20restitution.%E2%80%9D

“This isn’t the first time you have ignored human trafficking,” Clark said. “If you as U.S. attorney could not fight for these girls, how, as secretary of labor, can you tell this panel and the American people that you can responsibly oversee this budget [and] the Department of Labor, including human trafficking?”

“Epstein was incarcerated,” Acosta said. “He registered as a sex offender. The world was put on notice that he was a sex offender, and the victims received restitution.”

“I understand the frustration,” he said. “I think it’s important for people to know he was going to get off with no jail time or restitution. It was the work of our office that resulted in him going to jail. It was the work of our office that resulted in him having to register as a sex offender.”


In March, The Washington Post reported that, although Epstein’s alleged victims were as young as 14, the only minor he was convicted of soliciting was 16 when the offenses began. The decision to charge Epstein with a crime involving an older teen has eased his obligations to register as a sex offender. For example, Epstein does not have to register in New Mexico, where he owns a ranch, because his victim was not under 16.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight/

A couple of years ago, I was interviewing a former senior White House official when the name Jeffrey Epstein came up.

Unaware of my personal history with Epstein, this person assured me that the New York financier was no serious harm to anyone. He was a good guy. A charming guy. Useful, too. He knew a lot of rich Arabs, including the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, and, further, he had clever ideas about creating bond issues for them. “OK, so he has a girl problem,” this person threw on, almost as an afterthought.

Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Congress doesn't want to ...