Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
At the very
least,

25_47

He’s
delusional!
Your
cat
loves me
more


I
got
your
nose
I got
your
nose
Give me all
of your
giggles!
Give me
all of your
cookies!
Now!
Something
pithy
this way
comes
Fuck
that
noise
You do not
want to
know
what I
think about

Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

BumRushDaShow

(158,571 posts)
Sat Aug 9, 2025, 05:36 AM Aug 9

DOJ backs broader release of Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material - but there's a catch

Source: USA Today

Updated Aug. 8, 2025, 5:36 p.m. ET


The Justice Department has broadened its request for grand jury materials tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but it still wants to shield "personal identifying information," which could mean protecting anyone else from being tied to the convicted sex offenders.

The department wants a court to unseal not just the transcripts that will show not only the testimony of two law enforcement witnesses before grand juries that indicted Epstein and Maxwell, but also the exhibits that were part of those proceedings. Court exhibits are items of evidence, such as photos, videos, or documents.

The department made its position clear in an Aug. 8 filing to a Manhattan federal court, which is considering whether to release sealed materials from the grand jury process that led to federal indictments against Epstein and Maxwell from 2019 to 2020. While the department is going farther than it did in its previous effort to release just the grand jury transcripts, this new request appears to fall short of what at least some victims want.

"Any effort to redact third party names smacks of a cover up," victim Annie Farmer said through her lawyer in an Aug. 5 letter to the court. Farmer testified for the prosecution in Maxwell's 2021 criminal trial.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/08/08/justice-department-epstein-files-maxwell-grand-jury/85546245007/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ backs broader release of Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material - but there's a catch (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 9 OP
"Smirk" - Jeffy Eppy's Bestie (R) BoRaGard Aug 9 #1
The grand jury crap is not the Epstein files. The dithering about the grand jury crap is their dodge. Scrivener7 Aug 9 #2
DOJ trying to protect trumps best fucking friend Epstein. republianmushroom Aug 9 #3
So they want to release the shocking, salacious details of the rapes, but redact the names of the rapists? Midnight Writer Aug 9 #4
We want the Epstein files, not the grand jury transcripts. travelingthrulife Aug 9 #5

Scrivener7

(56,818 posts)
2. The grand jury crap is not the Epstein files. The dithering about the grand jury crap is their dodge.
Sat Aug 9, 2025, 07:45 AM
Aug 9

The grand jury crap will, by definition, have little in it about anyone other than Epstein and Maxwell.

Midnight Writer

(24,505 posts)
4. So they want to release the shocking, salacious details of the rapes, but redact the names of the rapists?
Sat Aug 9, 2025, 02:52 PM
Aug 9

They don't care about justice for the victims. They just want to release some more MAGA-porn to their flock.

travelingthrulife

(3,035 posts)
5. We want the Epstein files, not the grand jury transcripts.
Sat Aug 9, 2025, 09:44 PM
Aug 9

They said here are thousands of pages, pictures, no doubt films.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ backs broader release...