Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!
I have
DU friends
everywhere.
Rebellions
are built
on HOPE
DU
keeps
HOPE
alive
Thank you
EarlG
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Appeals court rules Trump clamp-down on spending data defies Congress' authority
Source: Politico
08/09/2025 09:19 PM EDT
A federal appeals court panel shot down a Trump administration bid to make secret a public database of federal spending that researchers say is crucial to ensure the administration is not flouting Congress power of the purse.
In an order issued Saturday evening, the three-judge D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel voted unanimously to give the administration until Friday to put the data back online.
Two of the three appeals judges assigned to the matter also signed onto a forceful opinion declaring that the administrations bid to conceal the data was an affront to Congress authority over government spending, one that threatened the separation of powers and defied centuries of evidence that public disclosure is necessary for the public good.
No court would allow a losing party to defy its judgment. No President would allow a usurper to command our armed forces, Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, wrote in support of the decision to deny the Trump administrations request to keep the data under wraps while litigation over the issue goes forward. And no Congress should be made to wait while the Executive intrudes on its plenary power over appropriations.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/09/appeals-court-rules-trump-clamp-down-on-spending-data-defies-congress-authority-00501348
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/orders/docs/2025/08/25-5266LDSN.pdf

Lovie777
(19,836 posts)Orrex
(65,831 posts)GB_RN
(3,409 posts)Im pretty sure that if it were possible, hed probably have hed his ring done in gold. Just as tacky as his NYC penthouse. 🤮
Bayard
(26,588 posts)Can't have that info made public.
LetMyPeopleVote
(168,402 posts)Appeals court rules Trump clamp-down on spending data defies Congressâ authority
— Lauren Ashley Davis (@laurenmeidasa.bsky.social) 2025-08-10T03:21:31.099Z
An order issued Saturday evening by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel gives the administration until Friday to restore the data online.
www.politico.com/news/2025/08...

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/09/appeals-court-rules-trump-clamp-down-on-spending-data-defies-congress-authority-00501348
In an order issued Saturday evening, the three-judge D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel voted unanimously to give the administration until Friday to put the data back online.
The video player is currently playing an ad. You can skip the ad in 5 sec with a mouse or keyboard
Two of the three appeals judges assigned to the matter also signed onto a forceful opinion declaring that the administrations bid to conceal the data was an affront to Congress authority over government spending, one that threatened the separation of powers and defied centuries of evidence that public disclosure is necessary for the public good.
No court would allow a losing party to defy its judgment. No President would allow a usurper to command our armed forces, Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, wrote in support of the decision to deny the Trump administrations request to keep the data under wraps while litigation over the issue goes forward. And no Congress should be made to wait while the Executive intrudes on its plenary power over appropriations.
The Trump administration ignited the legal battle when it decided in March to abruptly shut down the database, claiming the widely available public data threatened the presidents ability to manage federal spending. Henderson noted that the decision came amid a torrent of lawsuits questioning whether the administration was preparing to illegally impound or withhold congressionally mandated spending required by law to disburse. The administration claimed the database also forced the disclosure of information meant to be shielded from public view.