We\'re not
going back!
(=^.^=)
~~~~~~~~~~~~
FUCK
DONALD
TRUMP
(=^.^=)
~~~~~~~~
897932384626
433832795028
841971693993
751058209749
445923078164
062862089986
MONEY
DOES NOT
EQUAL
SPEECH
$ $ $
THE BEST
DEMOCRACY
MONEY CAN
BUY!!
*****
We\'re #1
Who knew?
So many
good Germans
in our party
:-(
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Paul Krugman tears into 'deadbeat' Trump ally with 'pathological inability' to be honest
Source: Raw Story
August 11, 2025 4:07PM ET
New York Times columnist and economist Paul Krugman attacked President Donald Trump after twisting data to make himself look better.
In a Monday column for his Substack, Krugman looked at some of the charts that his ally Stephen Moore brought to the Oval Office to verify some of his claims about the economy.
"Whats wrong with this picture?" he asks. "First, look at the chart. The second line claims that it shows 'medium income; a term unknown to economics. Clearly, it was supposed to say median income. OK, speling misteaks hapen (sic). But not, usually, in charts prepared for a presentation by the President of the United States."
The numbers presented by Moore are wrong, he said, citing Jared Bernstein, who examined the charges and the data. The larger problem for Krugman, however, is that Trump was standing there with Moore, "who may be the last person on the planet youd trust to tell you the economic truth."
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-moore-trump/

BaronChocula
(3,146 posts)I have to have foxnews visible for some work and every time I see Moore on screen I think of what a walking tsunami of failure he is. It's like David Brooks had an even stupider brother.
jfz9580m
(15,790 posts)I think he is tricking himself out as a resistance fighter these days in between alarmism over falling birth rates . I buy his resistance as much as I buy anything David Brooks..
I found it darkly funny that if you search for mediocre on Merriam Webster, one of the first quotes has that ass Brooks condescendingly dissecting FDR as a mediocre student while seemingly pointing on the merits of extracurricular activities.
So basically both attacking the concept that tonnes of fratty extracurriculars distract from your main studies while simultaneously getting a dig in at FDR as some sort of slick jock.
BaronChocula
(3,146 posts)And there it was at merriam-webster.com
There should be a passage on Brooks in the Webster's entry for "irrelevant."
BoRaGard
(7,036 posts)
Old Crank
(6,077 posts)Can't wait to hear his opinion on the new appointee. An economist from the Heritage society.
Bernardo de La Paz
(57,668 posts)(Krugman not in this article but you can guess.) Short term (24 hours appr) link for free:
https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/2025081224/bls-nominee-made-claim-that-no-sensible-economist-would-use-and-thats-one-of-the-kinder-comments
Jason Furman, the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama, but also a critic of President Joe Biden's stimulus measures, said Antoni is "completely unqualified" and an "extreme partisan."
Jessica Riedl, a former Heritage Foundation research fellow now at the conservative Manhattan Institute, said his articles and tweets "are probably the most error-filled or any think tank economist right now." Jeremy Horpedahl of the libertarian Cato Institute said he "either massively misunderstands labor market data, or he is willing to lie repeatedly about after being corrected by dozens of economists." Stan Veuger of the American Enterprise Institute, often described as a center-right think tank, called him "utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets."
Ahead of his nomination, Antoni defended the firing of Erika McEntarfer as BLS commissioner and made the case for reform of the agency.
"That person has overseen problems in the data for three years now," he said on C-Span. "That has been confirmed by the fact the BLS will publish one series of number, and later, publish another series of data that contradicts it," he said.
...
SunSeeker
(56,501 posts)Antoni has pointed out that foreign-born jobs growth has outpaced native born without noting that the native-born working population has stagnated due to retirements and lower birthrates.