Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Pick Your
Battles
Get Ur Rest
Look for Joy
We have
A Big Fight
Ahead
You still
have time to
to send some
money DU`s
way. Support
the summer
fund drive!

I have
DU friends
everywhere.



Rebellions
are built
on HOPE




DU
keeps
HOPE
alive


Thank you

EarlG

Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!

BumRushDaShow

(158,625 posts)
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 09:20 AM Aug 12

General involved in Trump's L.A. military deployment testifies he didn't hear protests described as "rebellion"

Source: CBS News

Updated on: August 12, 2025 / 6:20 AM EDT


Three officials involved in President Trump's controversial deployment of National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles testified Monday as the trial in California Gov. Gavin Newsom's lawsuit against the Trump administration began. The question at issue is whether the military forces sent in by Mr. Trump — including members of the Marine Corps and National Guard — violated the 19th century Posse Comitatus Act, which bars the military from enforcing domestic laws.

Newsom called the deployment of around 4,000 California National Guard troops, who normally are under the governor's command, an illegal "power grab." But Mr. Trump argued the move was legal and necessary to protect immigration agents and federal property during tense protests against operations by ICE, or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Mr. Trump's early June executive order calling up the Guard said the protests "constitute a form of rebellion." And the administration has justified the deployment using a law called Title 10 that allows the president to call up Guard forces during a "rebellion" or "invasion," or if he is unable "with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States."

In one notable moment during Monday's testimony, Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman — who at one point was deployed as the commanding general of the Guard task force in Los Angeles — said he never heard the term "rebellion" used to describe the situation in the nation's second-largest city.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/general-involved-in-trumps-l-a-military-deployment-testifies-he-didnt-hear-protests-described-as-rebellion-trump/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General involved in Trump's L.A. military deployment testifies he didn't hear protests described as "rebellion" (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 12 OP
Hope the General enjoys retirement. SSJVegeta Aug 12 #1
A brave man Bayard Aug 12 #2
Brave? Bluetus Aug 12 #3
Yes, Trump broke another law. LudwigPastorius Aug 12 #4

Bluetus

(1,414 posts)
3. Brave?
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 11:54 AM
Aug 12

Doing anything else would constitute perjury. And if Trump retaliates, then the General will have to sue to get his pension and benefits restored, but he would surely win that case if all he did was testify truthfully.

LudwigPastorius

(13,243 posts)
4. Yes, Trump broke another law.
Tue Aug 12, 2025, 11:58 AM
Aug 12

Unfortunately, nothing will be done about it, because he has the newly bestowed ‘presidential immunity’ and enough scumbag followers in Congress to make impeachment futile.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»General involved in Trump...