Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,835 posts)
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 07:11 AM Aug 19

Schumer Rips Trump's Bid To End Mail-In Ballots, Voting Machines

Source: Huff Post

Aug 18, 2025, 07:23 PM EDT


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) criticized Donald Trump on Monday after the president said in a social media post that he will “lead a movement” to get rid of mail-in ballots and voting machines. Schumer slammed the attack on voting rights in a statement, saying Trump’s comments are “not based in fact or reality.”

“Two facts: Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and vote by mail is safe, secure, and reliable,” Schumer said. “Let’s be clear - this is not based in fact or reality, but it is yet another way for Trump to silence Americans from using their voice in the democratic process and implement Jim Crow laws across America.”

Schumer went on to declare that “Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy.”

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Schumer doubled down on his disdain for Trump’s threats, writing, “I won’t stop fighting to protect democracy and protect voting rights,” alongside a screenshot of an ABC News story about Trump’s efforts to end mail-in ballots. In a Truth Social post earlier Monday, Trump made a claim — without providing evidence — that mail-in ballots and voting machines lead to voter fraud.

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/schumer-trump-mail-in-ballots_n_68a37eaee4b03709c085f75e






Chuck Schumer
@SenSchumer
·
Follow
Two facts: Donald Trump lost the 2020 election, and vote by mail is safe, secure, and reliable.

This is yet another one of Trump's attempts to silence Americans and implement Jim Crow laws across America.

I won't stop fighting to protect democracy and protect voting rights.
A headline from ABC News reads: Trump says he will lead 'movement' to end mail-in voting. Trump said he'll begin his efforts by signing an executive order.
12:50 PM · Aug 18, 2025


30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Schumer Rips Trump's Bid To End Mail-In Ballots, Voting Machines (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 19 OP
He's not leading a movement Puppyjive Aug 19 #1
States control how they run elections, not some pompous ass in the white house lostincalifornia Aug 19 #2
If only that had been true in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #8
Not entirely. Gore's defense team messed up. They should have asked for a recount for the whole state instead of lostincalifornia Aug 19 #15
Florida election law in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 20 #18
Who Would Have Thought Trump Would Release The JFK Files Before Evidence of 2020 Fraud? DrFunkenstein Aug 19 #3
Post removed Post removed Aug 19 #4
Only if you want to believe that and not read what he actually said ancianita Aug 19 #5
It's a tragedy for our country ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #9
It is, indeed. We have the Pirate John Roberts to thank for that. ancianita Aug 19 #13
No Roberts without Rehnquist 5 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 20 #19
Pretty sure he'd have been before the court either way. Rehnquist liberals were persuadable. ancianita Aug 20 #20
Al Gore would never have appointed Roberts ClimateChangeisReal Thursday #25
Of course not. That's exactly why Bush rewarded him and made him chief justice. ancianita Thursday #26
My original point still stands ClimateChangeisReal Friday #28
So be it. Your original point, however, ignores the reality of Roberts persuading the Rehnquist 5. ancianita Friday #29
Scalia's ruling made it clear what Rehnquist 5 were doing ClimateChangeisReal Saturday #30
Who's going to tell the Fascist Felon... Dulcinea Aug 19 #6
If only voting had been a state matter in 2000 ClimateChangeisReal Aug 19 #10
If he really wants to get rid of voting machines KS Toronado Aug 19 #7
And it'll take weeks to get the final results BumRushDaShow Aug 19 #11
Just like the Epstien files you'd NEVER see the paper trail. Case closed,Trump won Bengus81 Aug 19 #12
MaddowBlog-Trump's crusade against mail-in ballots isn't doing Republicans any favors LetMyPeopleVote Aug 19 #14
Schumer?! Wait what? LuvLoogie Aug 19 #16
His goons will be at the polls orangecrush Aug 19 #17
Like anybody pays attention to Schumer anyway. RealityChik Aug 20 #21
I and People I know "Pay Attention" to Sen Schumer. Cha Aug 20 #22
The person is having a very rough day, as DU REALITY becomes apparent progree Aug 20 #23
Yes, I see Cha Aug 20 #24
Chuck Schumer lost the perfect opportunity to tell everyone that Chump ALWAYS votes by MAIL FakeNoose Thursday #27
8. If only that had been true in 2000
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 01:53 PM
Aug 19

there would be no Rump today. Thank the Rehnquist 5 and their anti-democracy, unconstitutional Bush vs Gore ruling that took away Florida's constitutional right to conduct its election in 2000.

lostincalifornia

(4,236 posts)
15. Not entirely. Gore's defense team messed up. They should have asked for a recount for the whole state instead of
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 04:26 PM
Aug 19

a selected few areas.

That being said, O'Connor paid a price for that. In a 2013 interview she expressed regret in her decision, saying that the court should have never accepted the case. Perhaps KARMA also intervened when she also expressed second thoughts about her retirement, largely to care for her spouse's deteriorating health.

As for this issue with the sociopath trying to eliminate mail-in ballots by executive order, even this SC would have great difficulty going along with that. It would require a Constitutional change.





18. Florida election law in 2000
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 12:57 PM
Aug 20

did not allow for a statewide count of the ballots. The Gore campaign followed Florida election law to the letter. IN @)!#< O'Connor offered too little and it was too lat. The catastrophic damage to our country had already been put in motion because of O'Connor and her anti-democracy colleagues. I'm not holding my breath on the current maga SCOTUS majority. They've already given Rump immunity to do whatever he wants.

DrFunkenstein

(8,810 posts)
3. Who Would Have Thought Trump Would Release The JFK Files Before Evidence of 2020 Fraud?
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 09:30 AM
Aug 19

He must nor want to embarrass Biden with his wealth of evidence. He's so considerate. He doesn't even want to release the Epstein files because he's afraid a Dem will get hurt. A class act through and through.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

ancianita

(41,465 posts)
5. Only if you want to believe that and not read what he actually said
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 10:46 AM
Aug 19

Schumer went on to declare that “Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy.”

9. It's a tragedy for our country
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 01:55 PM
Aug 19

that this "fighting to protect democracy" was no where to be found in 2000.

ancianita

(41,465 posts)
13. It is, indeed. We have the Pirate John Roberts to thank for that.
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 03:49 PM
Aug 19

As I posted a long time ago...

The Supreme Court, "packed" since Bush appointed John Roberts as Chief Justice, has continued Republican oligarchs' scheme.

John Roberts is, long term, a Republican hack.
Those of us with long memory know what he did in 2000.
Because of Roberts and the Republican Party, we eventually got Trump.

As of 2024, out of the court's 800 rulings, Roberts voted conservative 82.7% of the time, second only to Alito.

As 538 puts it, he’s made five liberal rulings. THAT’S IT.

" When we get rid of those cases where he sided with at least two members of the conservative bloc,
the list of Roberts’s liberal “swings” drops to five cases. Five liberal-leaning decisions where Roberts joined his liberal colleagues and actually changed the outcome by doing so.”



As John Roberts strengthens corporate control of this government, John Roberts has made the SCOTUS their tool.

John Roberts has helped his Republican Party clear away all impediments to unrestrained corporate participation in electoral politics.

He has allowed the corporate “right to lie.” in the Nike v California case. Look it up.

Roberts has been no friend to average working Americans. If anything, he has been the most radical judicial right wing activist appointed to the Court in more than a century.

He’d worked most of his life in the interest of the rich and powerful, and chomped at the bit for a chance to turn more of America over to his corporate friends. See Jeffrey Toobins’ [iNew Yorker article, “No More Mr. Nice Guy.”]

The Roberts Court voted for the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, using its five-vote majority to totally rewrite the face of politics in America, rolling us paycheck Americans back to the pre-1907 Era of the Robber Barons.

Since Bush rewarded John Roberts for helping win his presidency, Roberts has served the Republican end of selling out rule of law to corporations that front for robber baron oligarchs -- to capture this government.

The Roberts court has weakened the Supreme Court by his weakening the U.S. Constitution, written explicitly to expand the rights and freedoms of “We the People” humans, not fictional personhoods.
19. No Roberts without Rehnquist 5
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 01:02 PM
Aug 20

I certainly agree with everything you said but there would now be no Roberts court now if the Rehnquist 5 hadn't shredded the U.S. constitution to stop the legal Florida vote count and install W against the will of the people.

ancianita

(41,465 posts)
20. Pretty sure he'd have been before the court either way. Rehnquist liberals were persuadable.
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 01:28 PM
Aug 20

And John the Pirate Roberts did just that -- he was the lead trainer on the legal team that argued before the Rehnquist court to stop the FL count.

During the 2000 presidential election, Roberts went to Florida to assist George W. Bush,[68] by which time Jeffrey Toobin identified him as "among the top advocates of his generation".[69] ... His arguments against government regulation often appealed to Rehnquist and the Court's conservatives while his style and skill in rhetoric won him the respect of John Paul Stevens and the Court's liberals.[71] Democrats and Republicans alike widely viewed Roberts as one of the most distinguished advocates to appear before the Supreme Court.[72]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roberts

IMO, it was, overall, a bad faith argument that the court's liberals just didn't see; because of his style and approach, Roberts' contempt for liberal scholars was lost on them at the time. Which, imo, was not their fault, since most scholars didn't see the wider ranging ramifications of neoliberalism at the time.



25. Al Gore would never have appointed Roberts
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 01:26 PM
Thursday

to the SCOTUS had the will of the people prevailed in 2000. Roberts has spent his entire career attacking voting rights and stopping the legal Florida vote count in 2000 was what made it possible for him to get on the SCOTUS. Robert's SCOTUS appointment by the Rehnquist 5 appointed W is a classic quid pro quo. W rewarded Roberts for helping him kill American democracy in Florida in 2000.
The Rehnquist 5 made no bones about what they were doing. Scalia admitted when he issued the stay to stop the legal Florida vote count in 2000 that he was doing it to protect W. The Rehnquist 5 along with the entire world knew that the uncounted Florida votes were located in the biggest and most heavily democratic voting counties in Florida. This realty favored Al Gore and the Rehnquist 5 were determined to prevent that at all cost, the U.S. constitution and Florida election law be damned. Since 2000, Scalia called the Bush vs Gore ruling, "Shit" and in 2013 Sandra Day O'Connor admitted that the SCOTUS should never have taken the case. Ya think? The Rehnquist 5's Bush vs Gore ruling was a judicial coup d'état that put Roberts on the SCOTUS that our country will never recover from.

ancianita

(41,465 posts)
26. Of course not. That's exactly why Bush rewarded him and made him chief justice.
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 01:45 PM
Thursday

We can thank the dishonest Sandra Day O'Connor for hustling the court together to make its ruling faster than a NY minute.

No, we haven't recovered. Yet. I wouldn't say never as long as we do what Newsom exhorts and implores other blue states to do. Don't give up over what they did to us 25 years ago.
We voters still have to fight like hell to get to the point of winning every election as if it's our last chance for democracy. People across the country are finally figuring that out. I know you can tell.

28. My original point still stands
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 12:41 PM
Friday

There would be no Roberts on the SCOTUS without the Rehnquist 5'sstopping of the legal Florida vote count and installing W against the will of the people. Sandra Day O'Connor is Exhibit A for why a highly partisan state legislative leader should never be a SCOTUS judge.

ancianita

(41,465 posts)
29. So be it. Your original point, however, ignores the reality of Roberts persuading the Rehnquist 5.
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 01:34 PM
Friday

Without John Roberts' pseudoarguments, the Rehnquist 5 wouldn't themselves have made those arguments up to justify their decision. We'll never know if they'd have decided differently, either. Politically motivated or not, the political consequences of today were beyond their ken at the time.

And no amount of arguing hypotheticals will change the facts of what happened. At least we agree that our party's been on the right side of history and easily more honest than not.

30. Scalia's ruling made it clear what Rehnquist 5 were doing
Sat Aug 23, 2025, 05:01 PM
Saturday

Scalia admitted in broad daylight in his ruling that counting all of the uncounted Florida votes would harm his candidate W so he shredded the U.S. constitution and Florida election law to stop the legal Florida vote count to prevent W from being harmed. That had nothing to do with Roberts. In addition, judge Sandra Day O'Connor had been very public about wanting to retire and not wanting Al Gore to pick her SCOTUS successor. That also had nothing to do with Roberts. The Rehnquist 5 knew their decision was bogus because they all refused to sign their names to it. Al Gore is the one who was on the right side of history by fighting to have the uncounted Florida votes counted. The rest of the party leadership adopted a roll over and play dead strategy which is why our country suffers so terribly today. Had it been W with the uncounted Florida votes not being counted been repug votes, you can be sure that the Rehnquist 5 would've ruled to count the uncounted Florida votes and the repugs in Congress would not have rolled over and played dead

10. If only voting had been a state matter in 2000
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 01:56 PM
Aug 19

our country would not now be living in this current Rump nightmare.

KS Toronado

(21,113 posts)
7. If he really wants to get rid of voting machines
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 01:46 PM
Aug 19

we should help him. Then we'll always have a paper trail we can go count again if necessary.

BumRushDaShow

(158,835 posts)
11. And it'll take weeks to get the final results
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 02:14 PM
Aug 19


But IMHO, the mail ballot IS the "paper trail". When they switched to the new touchscreen here in Philly in fall 2019, I HATED it and when the no-excuse absentee ballot option became available for the first time in spring 2020 for the primary (any every election since), I used that and haven't gone back!

Bengus81

(9,209 posts)
12. Just like the Epstien files you'd NEVER see the paper trail. Case closed,Trump won
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 03:30 PM
Aug 19

That's how it would go down.

LetMyPeopleVote

(168,648 posts)
14. MaddowBlog-Trump's crusade against mail-in ballots isn't doing Republicans any favors
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 04:23 PM
Aug 19

Republican officials want their party’s voters to cast their ballots through the mail. The president’s rhetoric is undermining his party’s message.



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-crusade-mail-ballots-isnt-republicans-favors-rcna225844

Then Trump hosted an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during which the Republican became rather animated — but not about the largest war in Europe since World War II. Rather, the American president got worked up talking about how much he hates when Americans vote by casting ballots through the mail.

Trump echoes comments he said Putin made to him last Friday: "Mail in ballots are corrupt. You can never have a real democracy w/ mail in ballots. We as a Republican Party are gonna do everything possible. We're gonna start with an executive order to end mail in ballots."

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-08-18T17:44:45.317Z


.....To justify this radical and aggressive offensive against this form of voting, Trump is peddling a variety of stale lies. More importantly, he’s claiming legal authority he does not have. But whether he realizes it or not, the president is also taking steps that won’t do his party any favors. Politico reported that he’s “once again threatening to undermine” a Republican electoral priority.

Republicans poured tens of millions of dollars last year into convincing their voters that casting ballots by mail was safe after Trump spent years bashing the practice and baselessly insisting it was rife with fraud. And it worked, with GOP voters closing or even reversing the mail voting gap with Democrats in several states. But now Trump is attacking mail voting again as he ratchets up his push to protect Republicans’ House majority in the midterms, scrambling a strategy Republicans effectively used to bank millions of votes in 2024.


Politico quoted Barrett Marson, a longtime GOP consultant in Arizona, who said voting by mail “historically has been an advantage for Republicans” in the Grand Canyon State and is a “safe and secure way to vote and has been for a generation in Arizona.” He added, however, that as the president sows “distrust” in the process and Democrats step up their game, the result is “not good” for Republicans.

It would be tough to blame GOP voters for feeling confused at this point. For years, Trump, the party’s undisputed leader, has veered wildly between two opposite positions. On the one hand, he’s falsely condemned mail-in voting as irredeemably corrupt and “stupid.” On the other hand, in between delivering those condemnations, the president has also encouraged rank-and-file GOP voters to cast their ballots through the mail.

At one point in 2023, Trump even told attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference that it was time for Republicans to “change our thinking” on mail-in voting, and soon after, he filmed a video for the Republican National Committee in support of the party’s early voting initiative.

In Texas, vote by mail is a key part of the GOP GOTV efforts. A larger percentage of GOP voters are older and vote by mail. trump may be hurting GOP GOTV efforts

orangecrush

(26,356 posts)
17. His goons will be at the polls
Tue Aug 19, 2025, 07:16 PM
Aug 19

Harassing anyone of the wrong color.

That's why he doesn't want mail in.

RealityChik

(394 posts)
21. Like anybody pays attention to Schumer anyway.
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 05:01 PM
Aug 20

The most courageous thing you could do for us is to retire.

Cha

(313,846 posts)
22. I and People I know "Pay Attention" to Sen Schumer.
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 05:51 PM
Aug 20
I hate this Bashing of our Democratic Leaders.

progree

(12,241 posts)
23. The person is having a very rough day, as DU REALITY becomes apparent
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 09:41 PM
Aug 20

Around 5:00 PM CT, Zero Removes...

In case you were getting discouraged.

FakeNoose

(38,391 posts)
27. Chuck Schumer lost the perfect opportunity to tell everyone that Chump ALWAYS votes by MAIL
Thu Aug 21, 2025, 02:32 PM
Thursday

Chump never votes in person ...at least not since he became a famous celebrity by way of "The Apprentice."
Before that, nobody paid attention.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Schumer Rips Trump's Bid ...