Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(159,953 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 07:15 PM Tuesday

White House seeks to keep funding on autopilot through January 31 to avoid shutdown

Source: Reuters

September 9, 2025 5:02 PM EDT Updated 2 hours ago


WASHINGTON, Sept 9 (Reuters) - The White House is seeking legislation that would extend current federal funding until January 31, avoiding a partial government shutdown beginning October 1, Republican U.S. House of Representatives Majority Leader Steve Scalise said on Tuesday. “That was a suggestion," Scalise told reporters, adding, “We're still working on the dates and how long it would extend, but that hasn't been finalized yet.”

A stopgap funding bill, if approved by Congress, would continue federal funding of many Washington programs at the current fiscal year's level, although there potentially could be add-ons for "emergency" accounts, such as for Federal Emergency Management Agency disaster relief efforts. Individual lawmakers could also seek other new initiatives. Some sort of government funding bill is needed by September 30, the end of the current fiscal year when funding expires for a range of federal programs.

The White House had no immediate comment. Congress and President Donald Trump are fighting over around $1.6 trillion in "discretionary" government spending out of nearly $7 trillion overall when taking into account programs such as Social Security that are automatically funded, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. Some of the largest expenditures are for military programs and interest payments on a national debt of $37.4 trillion - an amount that is becoming increasingly worrying to fiscal experts.

So far, Congress has not agreed on any of the dozen discretionary appropriations bills to operate an array of agency programs in the fiscal year beginning October 1. This does not include safety-net programs such as Medicare and Medicaid health insurance for the poor, elderly and disabled. Representative Rosa DeLauro, the senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, called the White House move an "extreme request."

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-seeks-keep-funding-autopilot-through-january-31-avoid-shutdown-2025-09-09/



Time to take hostages.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House seeks to keep funding on autopilot through January 31 to avoid shutdown (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP
Not to "bash Democratic public figures," but... regnaD kciN Tuesday #1
Shut it down. Shut it all down. PSPS Tuesday #2
Not a big shock that Robert Reich makes the case for Dems shutting down the government. summer_in_TX Wednesday #3

regnaD kciN

(27,259 posts)
1. Not to "bash Democratic public figures," but...
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 07:41 PM
Tuesday

...after what we've seen so far, is there any reason to think Democrats in Congress won't eventually fold just like the last time?

PSPS

(14,906 posts)
2. Shut it down. Shut it all down.
Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:21 PM
Tuesday

Funding trump makes as much sense as funding bibi. The federal government has already stopped doing the people's business.

summer_in_TX

(3,814 posts)
3. Not a big shock that Robert Reich makes the case for Dems shutting down the government.
Wed Sep 10, 2025, 12:37 AM
Wednesday

But the surprise was seeing two other knowledgeable and prominent people less known for radical responses call for it too.

https://open.substack.com/pub/robertreich/p/should-democrats-shut-the-government

Keeping the U.S. government funded now is to participate in the most atrocious misuse of the power of the United States in modern times.

So I for one have decided that the best route is to shut the whole f*cking thing down.

Morally, Democrats must not enable what is now occurring. Politically, they cannot remain silent in the face of such mayhem.


Dan Rather (and Ezra Klein) are raising the same question and making the case for doing so.
https://substack.com/@steady/note/p-173138267

Rather quotes Ezra Klein from the New York Times:
Ezra Klein in The New York Times brings a new argument and a new reasoning to this debate: “[J]oining Republicans to fund this government is worse than failing at opposition. It’s complicity. If there’s a better plan than a shutdown, great. But if the plan is still nothing, then Democrats need new leaders.”


Rather concludes:
Whether it is national Democrats pulling the purse strings from Trump or state Democrats refusing to enforce laws and mandates deemed illegal, resistance is building. And Democrats need to build it fast. They can’t wait for the 2026 midterms to check Trump’s power grab.


One prominent and knowledgeable advocate would be unsurprising but also unconvincing. But three?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House seeks to keep...