California lawmakers pass ban on masks for federal immigration agents
Source: The Hill
09/12/25 10:09 AM ET
California lawmakers have sent legislation to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) that could prohibit federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers from wearing masks while carrying out raids in the state. Newsom hasnt said whether he will sign the bill, which received final approval in the Legislature on Thursday.
The governors office didnt immediately respond to The Hills request for comment Friday, but he said in July that his office was reviewing the constitutionality of the proposal. Critics have taken issue with ICE agents wearing face coverings while carrying out President Trumps sweeping immigration crackdown in cities across the country. They argue the covering is meant as an intimidation tactic.
California Los Angeles in particular became a major focus of ICE operations over the summer as mass protests erupted in response to workplace raids. The president deployed National Guard troops and Marines to protect federal properties, sparking an ongoing court battle.
ICE didnt immediately respond to The Hills request on the California legislation, but officials in the Trump administration have repeatedly defended the need for officers to protect their identities.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5500425-california-immigration-law-enforcement-mask-policy/

Traildogbob
(11,799 posts)Lets go Blue Govs, all of ya!!! Get to it.
Masked armed gunmen need to be treated as possible thieves and terrorists. Cause they are.
Stand your ground applies.
Justice Brandeis
(263 posts)State legislators cannot impose mandates upon federal law enforcement personnel. Even liberal judges will strike this down.
BumRushDaShow
(159,749 posts)but they use that as "threats" and "tough guy" garbage and know that the courts are so overburdened and slow, that it would take forever to "strike down".
republianmushroom
(21,304 posts)2naSalit
(97,746 posts)
Jose Garcia
(3,291 posts)They know damn well that this is unconstitutional, but they voted for it anyway.