James Comey case 'coming apart at the seams' as crucial evidence collapses: report
Source: Raw Story
November 8, 2025 8:42AM ET
The Department of Justice's case against former FBI Director James Comey appears to be unraveling, with new evidence casting significant doubt on the prosecution's central allegations, The New Republic wrote.
Prosecutors claim Comey lied during 2020 Senate testimony when he denied authorizing an anonymous FBI source to speak to news outlets about the bureau's Hillary Clinton investigation with the alleged source being identified as attorney Dan Richman. But newly revealed documents show Richman wasn't even employed by the FBI at the time and that glitch has the government's case "coming apart at the seams," The New Republic wrote.
Documents reviewed by Lawfare reveal critical inconsistencies in Richman's employment status. His first term at the FBI ran from June 30, 2015, to June 30, 2016, serving unpaid and part-time as an advisor on encryption issues. A handwritten FBI official's note provides a damning detail: "Doc drawn up + sent to OGC for Richman signature. Never signed. Never officially reappointed after June 2016."
That suggests that all evidence prosecutors cited occurred outside Richman's periods of employment at the FBI, The New Republic reported.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/james-comey-2674277706/
Link to The New Republic article - https://newrepublic.com/post/202911/department-justice-james-comey-daniel-richman-fbi-employment
Renew Deal
(84,595 posts)They have evidence that Comey didn't order anyone to leak anything. Not sure why there is even still a case.
FSogol
(47,486 posts)republianmushroom
(22,122 posts)just trump's wet dream.
The Roux Comes First
(2,042 posts)chicoescuela
(2,530 posts)Shoeless Louis
(95 posts)chicoescuela
(2,530 posts)Give Peace A Chance
(139 posts)Wiz Imp
(8,389 posts)There's a reason why every single competent lawyer at DOJ refused to take it before a grand jury because it was obvious he committed no crime. Same with Letitia James.
Ilikepurple
(412 posts)The federal grand jury indictment process is very much susceptible to abuse if the DOJ doesnt mind losing at trial. While Im sure Bondi would love to win a few, I dont think thats the primary goal. I think its primarily to punish past anti-Trump behavior and to chill speech and actions against Trumps policies in the present. Even if found innocent most of us do not want to be indicted and go through a trial. I applaud all who stand up against political extortion.
Queso Delicioso
(172 posts)Or something to that effect. I'm not a lawyer. (But I'd probably do better than Trump's stooges)
Lemon Lyman
(1,547 posts)Happy with yourself for inflicting him on the world Jim?
mdbl
(7,902 posts)As Gomer Pyle used to say.
travelingthrulife
(3,997 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(9,688 posts)
lark
(25,786 posts)He has no knowledge and doesn't recognize that word so always gets in trouble with the courts that aren't fellating him before he even gets there.