Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,012 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 02:07 PM Nov 17

Supreme Court won't review loudspeaker prayers at state football championship

Source: Courthouse News Service

November 17, 2025


WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to put prayers at high school football games back in the spotlight. Three years ago, the high court ruled in favor of a coach’s mid-field prayers during games in Washington state. A Florida Christian school asked if such conduct could be broadcast over a loudspeaker.

“Nearly a decade ago, a bureaucrat decided that allowing two Christian schools to audibly pray in a stadium would breach the ‘separation of church and state,’” the school wrote. “It may seem like a trifle to some. But for the faithful at Cambridge Christian, and others subjected to religious discrimination by officials high and low, defending the right ‘to live out their faiths in daily life’ is no small matter.”

In 2015, Cambridge Christian School faced University Christian in a championship football game. The latter prayed over the loudspeaker when two Christian schools played in a previous championship game in 2012. Cambridge Christian made a similar request for the 2015 game, however, the Florida High School Athletic Association, a state-created entity that organizes and regulates a high school athletic league for public and private schools, denied its appeal.

Because the game was hosted at a publicly funded facility and it was a state action, the association said federal law barred it from granting permission for such activity.

Read more: https://courthousenews.com/supreme-court-wont-review-loudspeaker-prayers-at-state-football-championship/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court won't review loudspeaker prayers at state football championship (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Nov 17 OP
Jesus never used a loudspeaker. There. twodogsbarking Nov 17 #1
ha - if you want to be an "originalist" about it RussBLib Nov 17 #6
Sounds pretty good to me, assuming heat and running water. twodogsbarking Nov 17 #7
And he shut himself up in a closet. reACTIONary Nov 17 #9
Matthew 6:5 Cirsium Nov 17 #2
That's from the woke New Testament. nt Shipwack Nov 17 #4
My bad Cirsium Nov 17 #5
Millions die Turbineguy Nov 17 #3
ok, maybe I'm just getting too old, but.... RussBLib Nov 17 #8
The good guys (not the God guys) won.... reACTIONary Nov 17 #10
I couldn't tell either. Owl Nov 17 #11
Thanks. RussBLib Nov 17 #12
As long as they include my prayer to the flying spaghetti monster mdbl Nov 18 #13

RussBLib

(10,381 posts)
6. ha - if you want to be an "originalist" about it
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 05:17 PM
Nov 17

but where do you stop? no planes, no cars, no tv, no phones, and don't eat that nasty SHRIMP!!

twodogsbarking

(17,019 posts)
7. Sounds pretty good to me, assuming heat and running water.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 05:33 PM
Nov 17

Like Thoreou without room service by his mother and sister.

Cirsium

(3,222 posts)
2. Matthew 6:5
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 02:45 PM
Nov 17

“When you pray, don’t be like the hypocrites who love to pray publicly on street corners and in the synagogues where everyone can see them. I tell you the truth, that is all the reward they will ever get.

RussBLib

(10,381 posts)
8. ok, maybe I'm just getting too old, but....
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 05:50 PM
Nov 17

...from that story, I cannot tell if prayers are permissible over loudspeakers at football games or not.

Anyone?

https://russblib.blogspot.com

reACTIONary

(6,875 posts)
10. The good guys (not the God guys) won....
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 05:58 PM
Nov 17

.... I couldn't tell either, and even reading the article it was hard to get straight until the end.

Attorneys representing Cambridge Christian said that despite the denial....“While it’s disappointing the Supreme Court chose not to take up the case to reverse the wrongheaded precedent that led to these events, we are gratified that (face saving bullshit)....”

The justices did not explain their decision to deny certiorari. There were no noted dissents.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court won't revie...