Mike Johnson plots revenge for Epstein files humiliation with 'higher threshold' rules change in Congress : report
Source: The Independent
Friday 21 November 2025 13:01 EST
Speaker Mike Johnson is reportedly plotting a change in the rules for the House of Representatives after Democrats joined by just a few rogue Republicans forced his hand on a vote to release the governments files on pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, a new report reveals.
The move, reported Friday by Axios, comes after the House passed a discharge petition filed by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to declassify files related to the late convicted sex offender. Johnson had opposed the legislation until Trump gave his blessing.
An individual member can file a discharge petition to force a vote on the floor if a majority of members sign it. Still, only seven discharge petitions including Epstein have become law since 1935. But Johnson told Axios that discharge petitions have become too common and that he wanted to make them harder to obtain.
I'd like to see a higher threshold for a lot of these motions. You know, privileged motions, discharge petitions, added House Majority Leader Steve Scalise to the outlet. This also comes as Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) received enough signatures for his discharge petition to restore union rights for federal workers.
Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/mike-johnson-discharge-petition-epstein-b2870068.html
When you can't "win" or even "govern", you "change the rules".
intheflow
(29,904 posts)Mikey's just pissing in the wind.
BumRushDaShow
(164,008 posts)Yeah it could have because the draft was sitting in Committee and the Committee majority refused to release it for the full House consideration (debate/amendments/vote).
The Rule allowed the legislation to be forced out of the Committee with 218 signatures (a number that also corresponds to the majority of the members of the House), and it effectively does an end-run around the Committee and the SOH.
Most bills that get assigned to a Committee go there as their "final resting place", where a handful might actually be allowed out on the floor.
The SOH controls the legislative calendar.
Rebl2
(17,244 posts)Change the rules, lie and cheat. Republicans good at that.
Cha
(316,071 posts)Ugly Mouse face.
turbinetree
(26,805 posts)republic whenever he gets a chance......... he withheld all by himself the means of seating a duly elected representative from being sworn in for over 40 days after an election..........and now he wants to perform a rule change...............sounds like his underwear is getting a little tight and twisted...............
hlthe2b
(112,323 posts)patphil
(8,548 posts)I predict: There's only about 6 more days this year for the House to be in session. Johnson should savor them; he'll be gone in January.
onenote
(45,894 posts)The House Calendar shows the House is in session four days a week for each of the first three weeks of December.
patphil
(8,548 posts)Bengus81
(9,633 posts)So what's happening on the ACA subsidies??
patphil
(8,548 posts)They're done for November, and are in session for 12 days in December.
ck4829
(37,279 posts)twodogsbarking
(17,002 posts)Uncle Joe
(63,821 posts)Wonder Why
(6,421 posts)Grins
(9,151 posts)Every 13 years is too common? (Whats too common is the damn shadow docket!)
In history, presidents had to court Speakers and leaders of the Senate. They no longer do when faced with toadys like Johnson.
Johnson has proven to be the most feckless Speaker in the history of the House. The one Speaker willing to cover-up something as heinous as - fucking children. (I meant to say that.). What makes him more despicable is his moralizing, his faux religiousness, and that he is a Constitutional lawyer who ignores its precepts.
Going back to Gingrich I have never had a good thought about Republican Speakers. The internal IN-HOUSE fighting over Boehner, Ryan, McCarthy, Johnson, and whatever Republican follows him is just more proof : Republicans cannot govern.
keroro gunsou
(2,304 posts)is a whiney, pissy little bitch.
Bengus81
(9,633 posts)2naSalit
(99,214 posts)Isn't going to be speaker much longer. Marge is probably getting ready to kick him to the curb, she was making noise to that effect a couple days ago.
Bluetus
(2,026 posts)I don't see why any Dem would vote for such a rule change, and I'd figure the usual rogues from the GOP side would oppose it as well.
And seriously? When a majority of representatives say they want a vote on an issue, why should one guy be able to stop that?
flashman13
(1,821 posts)The Republicans must know they will soon be in the majority. They just might like the current rule to remain in place.
Dem4life1970
(1,033 posts)...to jam through their unpopular, undemocratic, ideas.
Changing the rules is the only way they can achieve success because they are only there to serve the 1%. Period. End of story.
Martin Eden
(15,223 posts)You know what else is too common?
A pathologically lying malignant narcissist becoming president twice in eight years.
A pseudo-Xian lying toadie becoming house speaker, ever.
Mz Pip
(28,308 posts)why not just do your job and get your house in order.