Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,692 posts)
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 10:39 AM Dec 9

Supreme Court weighs Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections

Source: Associated Press

By MARK SHERMAN
Updated 5:25 AM PST, December 9, 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump's administration, to overturn a quarter-century-old decision and erase limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president.

A day after the justices indicated they would overturn a 90-year-old decision limiting the president's power to fire independent agency heads, the court on Tuesday is revisiting a 2001 decision that upheld a provision of federal election law that is more than 50 years old. Democrats are calling on the court to uphold the law.

The limits stem from a desire to prevent large donors from skirting caps on individual contributions to a candidate by directing unlimited sums to the party, with the understanding that the money will be spent on behalf of the candidate.

The Federal Election Commission and the GOP argue that the court should cast a skeptical eye on the limits, in line with recent high court decisions. Led by Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative majority has upended a variety of congressionally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections. The court's 2010 Citizens United decision opened the door to unlimited independent spending in federal elections.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-campaign-finance-republican-spending-limits-0381e78b1e8a8da0e49f5b55b543894e



Good grief, wasn't Citizens United enough? Don't we have enough corruption thanks to this ever-grifting administration?
--------------------------

LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments for case on campaign finance restrictions NBC News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?vB4_qmIM8Ia8
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court weighs Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections (Original Post) ificandream Dec 9 OP
The Thomas Court will scrap the limits Miguelito Loveless Dec 9 #1
How much will the Sick Six be paid to overturn another law? Bayard Dec 9 #2
Goodbye spending limits RetiredParatrooper Dec 9 #3
I was listening to a little of the live feed ... ificandream Dec 9 #4
The states have authority to limit political contributions by corporations. pecosbob Dec 9 #5
Repugs B.See Dec 9 #6
3. Goodbye spending limits
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 01:19 PM
Dec 9

It is critical that the United States get a handle on this. No who lives in reality can write this crap:

"Independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption."

- Anthony Kennedy

And no one who isn't corrupt would put their name on agreeing with that shit.

ificandream

(11,692 posts)
4. I was listening to a little of the live feed ...
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 03:08 PM
Dec 9

... and it sounded like Coney Barrett was skeptical about removing the limits. We'll see what happens, of course, but I'm hopeful she's not the only one of the conservatives to think that way.

pecosbob

(8,311 posts)
5. The states have authority to limit political contributions by corporations.
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 03:15 PM
Dec 9

Montana has such laws on the books. All fifty states need to enact similar laws.

B.See

(7,806 posts)
6. Repugs
Tue Dec 9, 2025, 05:20 PM
Dec 9

sure do loves them some dark money.

(don't know what that smiley is exactly. but seemed fitting)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court weighs Repu...