I mean, no pleasure allowed. Impotence is fine with AI. It doesn't feel a thing. And if you lose a lower limb you still have the upper half.

Steroid injections? Very common procedure. Not that I'd want it, but still.

and out of surgery for 10 years! Bastards!

Last month Because I’m avoiding surgery to replace my arthritic joint!

"Epidural" means it's injected into the spinal cord.

Unless the words don't mean what they usually mean.

My spouse is a naturalized citizen yet I’m concerned for him. We just don’t know if the orange monster is going to take it away.

Why this is being flagged (other than cost cutting) is another question. Is the treatment of dubious efficacy? We need one of our DU physicians to offer an opinion here.

Hurts like hell.

Have had them in numerous joints. Keep me keeping on.

a Sadist. She thought you should endure the pain God brought you. So when she "took care of the poor"... it was without pain medication.

Of denying up charges by Medicare advantage where the real fraud is at.

That's one of its downsides. Of course, in that case, the purpose isn't to save the government money, but rather to maximize profit from the enrollees.

Broadly speaking, most of the payments made to the "Medicare Advantage" health care providers are funded by the Medicare system, so CMS is still involved, but someone allowed them to have this program named by a marketing department ("advantage" = "better" ) instead of naming it something that would more accurately describe it to the consumer.

Yes, they are provided by private insurance, and they are crappy - and shouldn't be. But that doesn't change the reality that they are, in fact, Medicare plans.

Might I suggest alternative monikers:

“Profits for Shareholders Plan”
…or
“CEO Needs Another Yacht Plan”
…or
“Denial to Thee Means Profits for Me”

Edited for clarity

that is SOP for "Advantage"

The biggest scandal is insurance companies upcoding the patient’s treatment and getting extra money from the government.

in Medicare Advantage plans and seems to be the growing trend in healthcare in general.

Across the board as the determinative method for all such medical treatment decisions.

Another needless layer of complexity which thwarts patient’s access to care. Which is the insurance company long game-get patients to become discouraged and forego the care they need. Gotta protect the profits uber alles..🤬

interfering with the doctor-patient relationship.

Medicare Advantage is a standard insurance policy (whose coverage is dictated by the Medicare program). They are permitted to impose third party interventions in the relationship (limited network, prior authorization, etc.). Medicare is **generally** not.

There is a limited preauthorization requirement under Medicare - things which often double as cosmetic (eyelid lifts, for example) and DME (e.g. limits on coverage - like continuous glucose monitors which are covered only for certain T2 diabetics).

AI prior approval may be a growing trend in INSURANCE - but it is not a growing trend in healthcare. Medicare is a special program which does not require pre-authorization at all (let alone by AI) except in very limited circumstances when there is a specific, narrow, risk that the procedure is not covered under Medicare. That is different from a third party determining that the medical benefots of a covered procedure are not economically warranted.

all the possible coverage options. Original Medicare is a coverage option, so my post was grammatically correct.

Insurance is a means to pay for healthcare; it is not healthcare.

Insurance schemes which insert bean counters (AI or not) in the decision-making element of the doctor-patient relationship, is growing. That's not health care - it is a limitation on access to healthcare (since most of us aren't made of money). Nor is it part of the Medicare model of care.

One of the key features of original Medicare is that if a procedure is covered by Medicare when used for medical purposes, the doctor is free to use their own assessment in determining whether to use it.

Under Medicare rules, there are very limited circumstances in which a doctor is required to submit a medical decision to a third party for review before carrying out the decision. Those are, almost exclusively, DME or procedures which serve dual purposes (cosmetic and medical). These are not.

and obtain treatments recommended by their doctors.

If they wanted to do their little experiment, they should have done it with AI plans, not Traditional Medicare.

People do not pay more for traditional Medicare. They do have a 20% copay if they don't have a supplemental policy.

and doctors and lab costs. But they choose Traditional Medicare (with Parts A and B) despite the higher cost because they aren't limited as to doctors and haven't been required to get prior authorization.

im pretty sure we needed pre approval on that.

the only thing that really heals these diabetic ulcers is to stay off of them.

Upthread someone speculated this looked like some kind of "purification through pain" idea strapped into a policy. Pain and humiliation seem well-represented here. Thank goodness AI systems are notoriously empathetic...

elderly populations most common sources of pain management, IMHO. Rather than pain management the Government seeks to replace it with cost management, not to actually save money but to convince seniors to not rely on Gov't services. If seniors give up or turn to other quasi service providers then billionaires like Musk and Ellison get to keep more of their money from paying for those services through taxes. And the quasi service providers get to make a bunch of money while also denying service. How else could they afford all of the advertising and support of PACS that support politicians that voted for this.
Yeah, that sounds about right.

Wife is diabetic, sees the endocrinologist every 90 days, requires blood draw with full workup one week before. Previously, when her appointment was over, the doc would give us an order for the next visit. No more. Now, go in, doc orders blood work, down to the second floor, draw blood, go to lunch while blood work is being done, come back later in afternoon.

Ditto for our annual -- can't do blood work in advance -- show up, get order, go to lad, stick, sit and wait for results.

Get a new doctor, or learn the rules yourself and educate them. Doctors pay very little attention to how the visits are paid for and their offices often work by a generic set of rules that are the most restrictive. My sarcoma specialist told me an MRI for suspected sarcoma would be delayed because I needed pre-approval. That is wrong. Under standard insurance - yes. Under Medicar Advantage plans - yes. Under standard Medicare - no.

We've been fighting for a week to get sensors for my wife's continuous glucose monitors. They are covered under Part B, not part D, and they do need prior authorization (their use is only covered by Medicare if you are on insulin, or in a few other limited circumstances). The first doctor we saw realized that, and knew her office used a particular provider for their Medicare Advantage providers - and insisted she needed to send the prescription there. Wrong.

Then she apparently didn't do anything. We called back to the office - and they said they would send it to CVS. We had an extended conversation about Part B coverage v. Part D coverage. I thought they had it straightened out - but sure enough the prescription was sent this morning to CVS without the prior authorization required, and the insurance under Part D was denied - since Medicare doesn't cover it like a drug.

Meanwhile, she had her first appointment with an endocrinologist - he re-ordered all her meds (including ones she just refilled, and including her sensor). He was unaware of any pre-authorization requirements - even though CGMs should be part of his bread and butter as an endocrinologist.

We has similar issues for blood glucose test strips - it took a month to straighten out.

So **IF** you are no standard Medicare your doctor is flat out wrong. There is no pre-authorization requirement for bloodwork. Your doctor may not know the rules - OR - he may be imposing his office policy on you. (If you don't like that policy, find a different doctor - or find out why he wants a same-day draw. There may be a medical reason for it.) But don't accept it because he is telling you it is a Medicare requirement - learn the rules and protect yourself.

Medicare Advantage, on the other hand, is an insurance program. They are permitted to impose prior-authorizations not required by Medicare. They are permitted to limit your doctors to a small list of doctors or providers, etc. If you have that - it was your choice not to get the full benefits of Medicare.

We are effectively under contract to Kaiser Permanente to obtain ALL of our healthcare from KP.

Going outside for self-financed care of any kind could invalidate the contract.

Potential double whammy.

"Historically, traditional Medicare did not require prior authorization, but the new pilot program from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is adding this requirement for 17 services."

How screwed up is that?

They do run the Medicare supplement plans and the (so-called) Advantzge plans, but not Parts A and B, thank goodness. I'm sure they'd be running the whole thing tomorrow if Republicans had their way.

brought to you by the republican party.

my doc decides, not a greed head third party.

Iʻd like to know who initiated this program!

Thanks for the information and all. Unreal. Just reading our DUers here and the impacts this would make to their lives is powerful.

Both my sisters routinely get steroid shots in their various joints (both are still a few years away from Medicare).

"The pilot will last six years. It begins on January 1, 2026, for those on traditional Medicare in Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington."

I wonder how they decided which states were to be the guinea pigs. My condolences to all traditional Meducare recipients who live in one of those states.

It says this pilot plan is supposed to last 6 years. I hope it can be rescinded sooner than that once Democrats are back in power.

Post haste. 🤬

if

I mean, who is going to cover the taxes your corpse will owe into eternity?

… but leaving it to AI to decide. Nothing can go wrong with it, eh?
I feel for all of you who benefit from those types of treatments.

FYI, this comment started out as

and ended up as

Diagnosis and treatment of impotence

Great. Just fucking great.

into the doctor patient relationship under original Medicare.

The Medicare program is designed to permit doctors to exercise their judgment, in consultation with their patients, for when covered procedures are required.

The solution - if a particular procedure should be excluded from Medicare - is to eliminate it as a covered procedure. Not to insert a third party speed bump in to the process.

One of these procedures is one I needed before I enrolled in Medicare. It was needed in connection with a very aggressive cancer. Had approval been required, it would have been denied. (I was under standard insurance at the time - and it was denied after the fact). Had the surgery been delayed while waiting for prior authorization, denial, and an appeal, the cancer (at that point doubling in 2-3 weeks) would likely have metastasized and I would be living with metastatic lung cancer or dead. And, yes, I'm in one of the states hit by this.

It is a travesty. Fortunately, it is only a few states and a few procedures. But it is the nose under the camel's tent to require prior authorization for procedures which are covered procedures under Medicare.

unless Congress says absolutely fucking NO!

The pilot testing is a divide and conquer tactic. Pick a few states, and a few procedures, so those impacted don't have much of a voice. And those not impacted can't be bothered to lend their voices to the chorus of "No!"

Most people - including far too many doctors - don't understand how Medicare works. I've been told by quite a few DU members that Medicare has similar pre-authorization requirements as standard insurance (not true). DU has at least one very vocal supporter of this pilot program.

Medicare becomes the "primary payer" and the FEHB plan is supposed to be the supplement.

me ashamed. For profit medical care is automatically corrupt just like, for profit prisons, for profit medical care is inherently corrupt.