Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,398 posts)
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:12 AM 10 hrs ago

Jet donated by Qatar could start serving as Trump's new Air Force One this summer, Air Force says

Source: CBS News

January 22, 2026 / 12:20 AM EST / CBS News


President Trump could start flying in a plane donated by Qatar as early as this summer, as the U.S. Air Force confirms it will deliver the refurbished jumbo jet for use as Air Force One within months.

"The Air Force remains committed to expediting delivery of the VC-25 bridge aircraft in support of the Presidential airlift mission, with an anticipated delivery no later than summer 2026," an Air Force spokesperson said Wednesday, confirming a report by The Wall Street Journal.

The royal family of Qatar donated the Boeing 747-style plane for Mr. Trump's use last spring. The plane could not enter service immediately, though, as the Pentagon needed to retrofit it to serve as Air Force One. It also needed to be checked for security and spying devices before it was accepted, a source told CBS News at the time.

The donated plane could take the place of two 35-year-old jets that currently serve as Air Force One. Mr. Trump has long pushed to replace the aging planes, but a project to replace them has faced delays, with delivery of two new planes currently set for 2027 and 2028.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jet-donated-by-qatar-could-start-serving-as-trump-new-air-force-one-this-summer/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jet donated by Qatar could start serving as Trump's new Air Force One this summer, Air Force says (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago OP
peace board 1? rampartd 10 hrs ago #1
the flying bordello will be his escape plane to Saudi land when they try to put him in jail. nt Javaman 10 hrs ago #2
Not Soon Enough!!! ret5hd 10 hrs ago #3
Oh, thaaaaaaat's why they turned back the other day Prairie Gates 10 hrs ago #4
It's not like listening devices are a problem... Chemical Bill 10 hrs ago #5
Everyone wants to know what Putin is telling him FakeNoose 8 hrs ago #9
Will he get to take it with him if he ever leaves the White House? NBachers 9 hrs ago #6
Yup GB_RN 5 hrs ago #14
So Qatar is providing his protected offshore bank account AND the getaway plane. nt woodsprite 9 hrs ago #7
They had to ensure the listening devices had the up to date relayerbob 8 hrs ago #8
Dang, 35 years old is getting up there EX500rider 7 hrs ago #10
You can't compare maintained aircraft to cars in years. Hell,B-52's are still flying Bengus81 5 hrs ago #15
Years don't count as much as flight hours or takeoff/landing cycles but they still count EX500rider 5 hrs ago #17
True and AF1 has gone through very,very few cycles. Bengus81 5 hrs ago #18
The plan to replace it started back in mid-2000's under Bush.... EX500rider 3 hrs ago #19
That pesky Foreign Emoluments Clause can just be ignored Bayard 6 hrs ago #11
You know it's bad when that's near the bottom of all the atrocities being committed fujiyamasan 5 hrs ago #13
Ignored unless a Democrat President accepts a jug or some trinket worth a couple of hundred Bengus81 5 hrs ago #16
... Solly Mack 5 hrs ago #12

Javaman

(65,234 posts)
2. the flying bordello will be his escape plane to Saudi land when they try to put him in jail. nt
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:25 AM
10 hrs ago

ret5hd

(22,261 posts)
3. Not Soon Enough!!!
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:25 AM
10 hrs ago

this job needs rushed thru NOW! we can’t be bothered with burdensome regulations like “safety” or “wing spar crack testing” or “fuel filters”! we aren’t a nation of wusses! we need this plane in the air NOW!

Prairie Gates

(7,334 posts)
4. Oh, thaaaaaaat's why they turned back the other day
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:26 AM
10 hrs ago

"See, look what a dangerous piece of junk this is!"

Fucking clown show.

Chemical Bill

(3,092 posts)
5. It's not like listening devices are a problem...
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:31 AM
10 hrs ago

when Trump says the quiet part out loud all the time. He has no secrets.

FakeNoose

(40,409 posts)
9. Everyone wants to know what Putin is telling him
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 11:21 AM
8 hrs ago

... nobody cares what he says back to Putin.

GB_RN

(3,521 posts)
14. Yup
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 01:57 PM
5 hrs ago

The arrangement is that it will go to his Presi-dunce-ial library foundation, not the library itself. So, it would not be under the control of the federal archives, and thus available for his personal use. Deal signed off on by his personal lackey “Attorney General,” Pam Bondi.

relayerbob

(7,382 posts)
8. They had to ensure the listening devices had the up to date
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 11:11 AM
8 hrs ago

English to Russian translation software installed

EX500rider

(12,229 posts)
10. Dang, 35 years old is getting up there
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 12:31 PM
7 hrs ago

The Qatar one is 13 yo, and I would guess low flight hours/cycles

Bengus81

(9,897 posts)
15. You can't compare maintained aircraft to cars in years. Hell,B-52's are still flying
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 02:03 PM
5 hrs ago

They've been maintained,upgraded and gone over with a fine tooth comb for years and are still in service. They went into service in 1955.

Air Force 1 is basically in brand new condition 35 years later.

EX500rider

(12,229 posts)
17. Years don't count as much as flight hours or takeoff/landing cycles but they still count
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 02:21 PM
5 hrs ago

All current B-52's are H models built in the 60's.
I also suspect military bombers are built a little more robust then commercial jets so they will still fly with battle damage.

For example a B-52H still flew after its vertical stabilizer sheared off in severe turbulence in 1964.
The aircraft landed safely.


Unlike Japan Air Lines 747 Flight 123 when it lost it's vertical stabilizer. It was the largest number of fatalities from the crash of a single aircraft.

Japan Air Lines Flight 123 was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Tokyo to Osaka, Japan. On the evening of Monday, August 12, 1985, the Boeing 747 flying the route suffered a severe structural failure and explosive decompression 12 minutes after takeoff. After flying under minimal control for 32 minutes, the plane crashed in the area of Mount Takamagahara, 100 kilometres (62 mi; 54 nmi) from Tokyo.
The aircraft, featuring a high-density seating configuration, was carrying 524 people. The crash killed all 15 crew members and 505 of the 509 passengers on board, leaving only four survivors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Air_Lines_Flight_123

EX500rider

(12,229 posts)
19. The plan to replace it started back in mid-2000's under Bush....
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 03:43 PM
3 hrs ago

......due to the aging fleet, but President Obama's administration formalized the replacement program, choosing Boeing for the new VC-25Bs (modified 747-8s) in 2015.

However 747 production ended in 2022, making getting a new one somewhere between impossible & super expensive.

Bayard

(28,808 posts)
11. That pesky Foreign Emoluments Clause can just be ignored
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 01:24 PM
6 hrs ago

"The Articles of Confederation, America’s first national constitution, apparently borrowing from the Dutch, included a provision in Article VI stating: “[N]or shall any person holding any office of profit or trust under the United States, or any of them, accept any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any King, Prince or foreign State.”

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/759

More grounds for impeachment in plain sight. George Washington and the gang said so.

Bengus81

(9,897 posts)
16. Ignored unless a Democrat President accepts a jug or some trinket worth a couple of hundred
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 02:06 PM
5 hrs ago

bucks from a foreign Country to place in the Oval Office. Republicans would be pissing their pants,having their heads explode and calling for impeachment...in no certain order.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jet donated by Qatar coul...