do the reviewers get a lobotomy afterwards?

Grok?

Staff can scan through the redacted ones already available and tell their congress person which documents to focus on when unredacted. They are all indexed with a unique ref. Number.

You have a good idea there. I wonder what technology will be available. Will it just be Ctrl F?

They have tools for that. It's common when reviewing million of documents as part of a trial discovery. I assume these tools are now augmented with AI to help sort through it.

They are still determining which of their own they will throw under the bus.

Andrew the-former-prince was an easy one. Nobody cares about him.

Or is this going to be another Feinstein "you wouldn't believe what we saw in there" type of thing?

NFW. Hard copies must be seen because we all know how much this regime loves creating AI shit and false images. They'll try to pull the same shit with the Fulton County 2020 ballots, mark my words.

anything of meaningful content, or they will misdirect to other people rather than DJT.

They are really FN with us!!

Not nearly what the DOJ has actually redacted, but some of theredactions are legitimate and those can not be released to the public(the legitimate redactions are to protect the victims). So it is legit to only allow members of Congress to see unredacted files.

If the documents, even if currently not editable, were ever in digital editable form, they have had enough time to replace names of the President's friends with other names, including assigning the Clinton's names to events they weren't even around for. Also, for visuals, if you can't have the documents for visuals that aren't in the redacted copies, how does anyone know if they are photoshopped or not? Not even better than nothing in my opinion. Every redacted spot is at the DOJ's replacement.

They need to see source material. Especially photos and videos. Too easy to photoshop.

I hope some of the people on Reddit who have been combing thru the files will be able to tell their Congresspeople which files to look at.

I hope everyone will understand that I'm a bit skeptical of this --
-- "unredacted"??? Sure they are.
-- "3 million"??? ROTFLMAO.
-- "next week"??? In which year?

They can and will see the unredacted original files. But there are many catches in this deal.

They can't make copies, or take photos, or email them out. No cellphones will be allowed in the viewing room. They have to view the documents and write down whatever notes they want to make, because that's all they can bring in or take out of the room. How much can they accomplish within these parameters?

Well. a lot ... if they come prepared and if they know where to look.

This weekend, all the congressional staffers will be going through the redacted files, writing down the numbers of the suspicious or likely pages that might have something juicy. Next week the Congressmen/women will use these staffer notes to hone in on the documents that will hopefully provide context and the "juicy gossip" that we all crave.

I'm expecting to get a huge wave of anonymous leaks by Monday afternoon. Or maybe anytime Tuesday.

Be prepared.

been scouring the redacted pages.

The law only allows redactions to protect victims,not to save other people from embarrassment. It's obvious the DOJ redacted the names of hundreds if not thousands of non-victims. All of those redactions are illegal. Somebody needs to compile a list of as many of those names as possible and read them on the floors of Congress.