Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,690 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 06:42 AM 3 hrs ago

US judge throws out immigration board's ruling endorsing Trump mass detention policy

Source: Reuters

February 18, 2026 8:45 PM EST Updated 7 hours ago


Feb 18 (Reuters) - A federal judge threw out on Wednesday an administrative board's decision endorsing the Trump administration's policy of subjecting thousands of people arrested during its immigration crackdown to mandatory detention. U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes in Riverside, California, vacated the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals after finding the administration had failed to comply with her earlier order declaring unlawful the underlying policy of denying detainees the chance to seek release on bond.

Sykes' Wednesday ruling, in a class action lawsuit that covers migrants nationwide, is more sweeping than decisions by hundreds of other U.S. judges holding the policy is unlawful and ordering detainees to be freed or given bond hearings.

Sykes, appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden, called the administration's actions "shameless" and accused it of trying to continue its "campaign of illegal action" by still refusing bond hearings despite her prior ruling. "Respondents have far crossed the boundaries of constitutional conduct," Sykes wrote.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Department of Justice, which oversees the board, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-throws-out-immigration-boards-ruling-endorsing-trump-mass-detention-2026-02-19/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lbvgmqqblvq/02182026bond.pdf
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US judge throws out immigration board's ruling endorsing Trump mass detention policy (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 3 hrs ago OP
They will appeal all way to the TSF SCOTUS. sinkingfeeling 2 hrs ago #1
Nah... this Judge was appointed by Biden. OldBaldy1701E 1 hr ago #3
But in a suprising development BumRushDaShow 50 min ago #4
Until there is proof that they have paid one cent from their own pockets, I will stand by my statement. OldBaldy1701E 38 min ago #5
"Until there is proof that they have paid one cent from their own pockets," BumRushDaShow 28 min ago #6
A few bulwarks left against a fascist administration wolfie001 1 hr ago #2

OldBaldy1701E

(10,799 posts)
3. Nah... this Judge was appointed by Biden.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 08:48 AM
1 hr ago

They will just decry that judge and then ignore anything they say.

You know.. like they pretty much have been doing with all of them.

BumRushDaShow

(167,690 posts)
4. But in a suprising development
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:02 AM
50 min ago

FINALLY (that I have run across) someone in 45's administration IS getting fined for violations of court orders - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143618435 ($500 per day... at least to start).

OldBaldy1701E

(10,799 posts)
5. Until there is proof that they have paid one cent from their own pockets, I will stand by my statement.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:14 AM
38 min ago

Having a bunch of kooks ante up on behalf of the person does not count as 'paying a fine'. Neither does misappropriation of official funds.

So, have they paid anything yet? I am trying to find out, but I don't seem to be able to find much on it.

BumRushDaShow

(167,690 posts)
6. "Until there is proof that they have paid one cent from their own pockets,"
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:24 AM
28 min ago

That's not gonna happen with government employees in their personal capacity.

But after all the efforts that D.C. District Chief Judge James Boasberg has been going through to have similar contempt punishments doled out for similar court violations (where he was partially smacked down by 2 different panels from the appellate court from doing it but permitted to continue his investigations into who to apply the contempt to), THAT action in MN, is the first that I could find that actually "happened".

Baby steps. Could be a prick-sized crack in a dam.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US judge throws out immig...