then Congress can't abdicate its responsibility
in that regard.

Right.

Spineless weasel, FTR.

How did Mike Johnson say all that with Trump’s dick in his mouth?

First time since '45, if memory serves. I guess our definitions of wartime activities differs.

That's an act of war in anybody's book

going to get to volunteer to fight? I'm pretty sure non-whites won't volunteer (and I hope they don't.)

Last edited Wed Mar 4, 2026, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)

killing everyone in his administration, we wouldn't be at war with said country because said country was just doing a "very specific clear mission."

I've heard of turning the other cheek but I can't imagine that even "Johnson's Baby Powder" would take the stratospheric road in that case.

Thanks for the thread Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

On a fact finding mention on the ground.

"On the other hand, we're not actually married"

The GOP members have neutered themselves. They may not have passed an Enabling Act but it is clear they are going to let Trump rule by fiat.

Not really a war as such, people aren't really being killed, things really aren't being bombed and blown up.

The dead are crisis actors who go home when the cameras are off, the buildings in rubble is just CGI.

George Orwell smiles!
The double talk is just his style.

It's operation 'slightly angry', not Epic fury.
Made for the evening news for US MAGA propaganda believer consumption.

Other sane media sources like Al Jazeera, BBC (UK), DW seem to think it's an undeclared war.
Trump and Johnson need a stiff word with them to get them to see things more clearly.

The question no one, not even George Orwell, asked directly:

Who benefits?

Do tell, Mikey...cause nobody else knows what that could be.

when he sent boots on the ground to Iraq to find WMDs that didn't exist?

It was only some 20 years ago.

Ignoring the obvious or trying to sell us a load of crap?
We're not buying!

I'm sure he will update his position once he's had a chance to get his opinion from the Administration and his pastor.

Besides, what part of "very specific, clear mission and operation" do we not understand?

I mean, "specific" can mean a lot of things. It is not a word that indicates any sort of precision--come on now.

"Clear" can mean almost anything as well. It's just a matter of perspective--and squinting. Don't forget the squinting.

So, if you squint, you can see clearly that we specifically attacked Iran because Iran was going to attack us because Israel was going to attack them because they were a week away from having a nuclear weapon in a year that could be launched from a missile that doesn't exist and has not been tested tomorrow and hit the United States with Shariah law and undermine the Christian Nationalist fever dreams of millions of Americans that claim to follow Jesus but cheer on cruelty to the very people Jesus would be trying to protect while worshiping a cruel, lying, cheating, grifting, pedophile who has 34 felonies and has been convicted of sexual abuse in a court of law.

See? It all makes sense....

Guess, he can't answer with his typical "First I have heard of that. I need to look into it ... yaddayaddayadda "

What a spineless little man.