Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,420 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 07:38 PM 18 hrs ago

Exclusive: Trump Administration Plans to Announce Coalition to Escort Ships Through Strait of Hormuz

Source: The Wall Street Journal.

Live Updated 1 hour ago

Exclusive: Trump Administration Plans to Announce Coalition to Escort Ships Through Strait of Hormuz

By Alexander Ward

The Trump administration as soon as this week plans to announce that multiple countries have agreed to form a coalition that will escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz, which runs along the Iranian coast, U.S. officials said. They are still discussing, however, whether those operations would begin before or after hostilities end.

The White House declined to comment on the expected announcement, which could shift depending on battlefield conditions. Publicly, many countries have been noncommittal to such an escort mission until hostilities cease, given the risks involved.

{paywall}

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/us-israel-iran-war-news-2026/card/exclusive-trump-administration-plans-to-announce-coalition-to-escort-ships-through-strait-of-hormuz-YBtXVBjxeLjL6yAqEWJV



I am aware that DU prefers that threads in LBN be based on events that have occurred rather than events that are supposed to be occurring.

This article in The Wall Street Journal., though, is significant in itself, as even a story about plans has the power to move markets. It's not just a story; it's a metastory. In any event, I can easily find several threads in LBN posted in anticipation of an event's occurrence.

How much weight should you give to this story? AI reminds us:

The New York Times holds the record for the most Pulitzer Prizes won by a single organization, with over 145 awards as of early 2026. For individual recipients, reporter David Barstow of The New York Times holds the record, having won four individual Pulitzer Prizes for investigative reporting.
(Source: The New York Times Company)

Top Organizations with Most Pulitzer Prizes:
The New York Times: 145
Associated Press: 59
Los Angeles Times: 46
The Wall Street Journal: 37
The Washington Post: 68 (Note: Source 9 contradicts 4, but The Post generally holds a high count, second to NYT)

I report; you decide.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Trump Administration Plans to Announce Coalition to Escort Ships Through Strait of Hormuz (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 18 hrs ago OP
Stay frosty Aviation Pro 18 hrs ago #1
It's been going around lately. I can't seem to shake it. NT mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #11
Mmm ... prolly not UpInArms 18 hrs ago #2
Pretty big loophole there dpibel 18 hrs ago #3
To put it another way gab13by13 14 hrs ago #34
My Mom used to say "We'll see" when we asked to do something and she was a no Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #4
He's announced lots of things before that countries had not actually agreed to. tanyev 17 hrs ago #5
Trump seems not to be one of the people mentioned as a source for this article, at least in what I can see. mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #8
More about the story's author: mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #6
Probably happen in two weeks FakeNoose 17 hrs ago #9
So Trump announces plans to announce, eh? DJ Synikus Makisimus 17 hrs ago #10
"U.S. officials said," is all Alexander Ward wrote, at least in the part I'm able to read. mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #13
The Child Rape regime Miguelito Loveless 17 hrs ago #12
1 billion dollars to join his board of piece Red Mountain 17 hrs ago #14
after hostilities end? ya wouldnt need an escort then. And trump KNOWS about escorts msongs 17 hrs ago #15
There would surely be mines in place in need of detection. NT mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #16
give a snorkel kit to the wind up GI Joe doll and let him and little marco clear the mines nt msongs 16 hrs ago #18
How much will President Pedo charge for protection? wnylib 16 hrs ago #20
If there are still live mines whose locations Iran won't disclose, then hostilities haven't ended. nt SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #37
Any of this coalition have; you know...standing naval fleets? EarthFirst 16 hrs ago #17
Let orange $atan keep panicking. Justice matters. 16 hrs ago #19
Any attempt to escort ships will require the Navy Lithos 16 hrs ago #21
Probably went to Trump University. Talitha 16 hrs ago #23
Trump was the Dean... Lithos 16 hrs ago #24
What a bloated gas bag. Talitha 16 hrs ago #22
He has a concept of a plan. hay rick 15 hrs ago #25
I'm guessing no boats from the Caribbean. surfered 15 hrs ago #26
Who makes up this coalition he claims is gonna escort ships? Deuxcents 15 hrs ago #27
10 Countries. 0 Warships. Justice matters. 13 hrs ago #38
Thank you for the explanation. We're in this situation because of his arrogance and disrespect Deuxcents 13 hrs ago #39
Trying to manipulate the market again, I see. Ferrets are Cool 15 hrs ago #28
Where do I send the prize? NT mahatmakanejeeves 15 hrs ago #30
I'm sure those asshat Trump boat paraders in Fla. would be willing to help out .... Diamond_Dog 15 hrs ago #29
What happens to Iran if a tanker or frigate gets sunk? OC375 15 hrs ago #31
the same thing that is happening to them now. uncle ray 14 hrs ago #32
These guys will volunteer. groundloop 14 hrs ago #33
My stupid question of the week: ananda 14 hrs ago #35
My stupid question: How do more ships prevent missiles? Attilatheblond 12 hrs ago #41
"They are still discussing, however, whether those operations would begin before or after hostilities end." SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #36
"The Coalition of the Willing". Just like the Iraq war. Only this time, nobody's coming... /nt artemisia1 13 hrs ago #40
Too many countries were pulled into previous conflicts started by the US to now heed the call. Aussie105 9 hrs ago #42
You and Israel? Same "coalition" that lit the fuse? pat_k 3 hrs ago #43
He's just trying to manipulate the stock market. the_liberal_grandpa 2 hrs ago #44

dpibel

(3,903 posts)
3. Pretty big loophole there
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 07:45 PM
18 hrs ago

Right in the first paragraph, in the part you can read for free, is this bit of weaselspeak:

They are still discussing, however, whether these operations would begin before or after hostilities end.


"As soon as it's safe, you'll see an escort coalition like no one has ever seen before!"

Prairie Gates

(8,005 posts)
4. My Mom used to say "We'll see" when we asked to do something and she was a no
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 07:54 PM
17 hrs ago

but didn't want to deal with the trouble of saying No.

I suspect many of these countries gave Trump the "We'll see."

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,420 posts)
7. Trump seems not to be one of the people mentioned as a source for this article, at least in what I can see.
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 08:07 PM
17 hrs ago

All Alexander Ward wrote was "U.S. officials said."

Yeah, that doesn't exactly narrow it down.

Trump can get pestered about this tonight on his at back from Florida.

Thanks for writing, and good evening.

Response to tanyev (Reply #5)

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,420 posts)
6. More about the story's author:
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 08:00 PM
17 hrs ago
Alexander Ward
National Security Reporter, The Wall Street Journal

Alexander Ward is a national security reporter covering the White House and State Department for The Wall Street Journal in Washington. Alex’s reporting focuses in particular on the inner workings of the National Security Council and how top players in an administration formulate and execute foreign policy.

Alex was previously the White House and national security reporter at Politico, where he was also the first author of its "National Security Daily" newsletter. Before that, he was Vox's White House reporter covering foreign policy and worked at the Atlantic Council think tank covering national security and military affairs.

Alex has won numerous awards for his reporting and was named a Pulitzer Prize finalist along with Politico colleagues for Supreme Court coverage.

In February 2024, Alex published his first book, "The Internationalists: The Fight to Restore American Foreign Policy after Trump." He is a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

{snip}

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,420 posts)
13. "U.S. officials said," is all Alexander Ward wrote, at least in the part I'm able to read.
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 08:28 PM
17 hrs ago

I expect the insiders have already been tipped off so they can take their positions.

When the plans turn out to be something else, they will have been tipped off ahead of time of that announcement too.

msongs

(73,627 posts)
18. give a snorkel kit to the wind up GI Joe doll and let him and little marco clear the mines nt
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 09:00 PM
16 hrs ago

SunSeeker

(58,221 posts)
37. If there are still live mines whose locations Iran won't disclose, then hostilities haven't ended. nt
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 11:47 PM
14 hrs ago

EarthFirst

(4,108 posts)
17. Any of this coalition have; you know...standing naval fleets?
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 08:54 PM
16 hrs ago

My suspicion is that either half make statements that they haven’t fully committed; or do not have the military hardware to participate in an escort capacity.

Justice matters.

(9,724 posts)
19. Let orange $atan keep panicking.
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 09:13 PM
16 hrs ago

Hoping that sleepless high-pressure anxiety about gas prices will finally take its toll...

Lithos

(26,635 posts)
21. Any attempt to escort ships will require the Navy
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 09:30 PM
16 hrs ago

The costs that will be incurred are likely to be astronomical and not economically feasible.

Orange Dunderhead failed economics in college; it shows.

hay rick

(9,563 posts)
25. He has a concept of a plan.
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 10:29 PM
15 hrs ago

I find it difficult to believe that any non-combatant nation will be willing to risk their naval vessels until the U. S, has demonstrated that they have deprived Iran of the ability to launch drones and missiles at shipping in the Strait- unlikely without a boots-on-the-ground-in-Iran mission by the 31st MEU and others. If that is accomplished our Navy would still have to demonstrate that the passage is free of mines and can be kept that way.

Justice matters.

(9,724 posts)
38. 10 Countries. 0 Warships.
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 12:16 AM
13 hrs ago

Trump went hat in hand to the world after he imposed illegal tariffs on their goods, insulted and demeaned them, saying they took advantage of the US while they only do commerce with whoever wants to buy their products, including customers in the US. The world checked its phone and put it back in its pocket.

France said no. Officially. In writing. Germany said nothing, which is German for no. Norway said no. The UK is “discussing options with allies,” which is British for no. Japan stayed silent while 70% of its Middle East oil supply sits behind a minefield. South Korea watched Washington and Tehran play chicken with its own energy supply and declined to pick a side. China called it a sovereign right and hung up. Qatar didn’t just refuse. Qatar stopped production entirely and declared force majeure. Their energy minister did not mince words: this will bring down economies of the world.

Iran is still there. Still attacking ships. Still laying mines. Still holding the strait.

The most powerful military on Earth sent out the call. Ten countries heard it. The result is a number that requires no commentary: zero.

This is what the end of American power looks like in practice. A request for warships that came back empty. Washington spent decades telling the world that the US-led order was worth defending. The world has moved away from the US.

Deuxcents

(26,583 posts)
39. Thank you for the explanation. We're in this situation because of his arrogance and disrespect
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 12:25 AM
13 hrs ago

I doubt we’ll get out of this mess, if ever, but it won’t be soon, I’m afraid.

ananda

(34,998 posts)
35. My stupid question of the week:
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 11:33 PM
14 hrs ago

Is it even possible for several ships to escort one
tanker through the strait?

Attilatheblond

(8,765 posts)
41. My stupid question: How do more ships prevent missiles?
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 12:56 AM
12 hrs ago

Does Trump think it's 1812? Or does Putin pay him a bonus for every one of OUR navy ships that go down?

SunSeeker

(58,221 posts)
36. "They are still discussing, however, whether those operations would begin before or after hostilities end."
Sun Mar 15, 2026, 11:43 PM
14 hrs ago

Well, if hostilities end, then the ships don't need escorts. So, in other words, these countries haven’t decided to help Trump yet.

Sure sounds like this "coalition" is just stringing Trump along.

artemisia1

(1,829 posts)
40. "The Coalition of the Willing". Just like the Iraq war. Only this time, nobody's coming... /nt
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 12:45 AM
13 hrs ago

Aussie105

(7,847 posts)
42. Too many countries were pulled into previous conflicts started by the US to now heed the call.
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 04:11 AM
9 hrs ago

As an Australian, I think our position will be very clear.

Fool us once (Vietnam) and shame on you, try to fool us twice (today) and we politely decline your generous offer.

No country will send escort ships to a mined narrow straight off the coast of Iran to be sitting ducks.
No enthusiasm for a suicide mission, especially after Trump's past badmouthing of some of the countries he is now asking.

Trump's mess, Trump needs to clean it up.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Trump Administ...