Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(169,045 posts) Wed Mar 18, 2026, 07:48 PM 6 hrs ago

US aircraft carrier moves away from Iran war for repairs after fire

Source: CNN Politics

PUBLISHED Mar 18, 2026, 3:36 PM ET

The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier is moving away from operations tied to the Iran war and sailing to the US Navy’s base in Crete for repairs after a fire broke out in the ship’s laundry area last week, a US official said. The movement of the Navy’s most advanced aircraft carrier comes as military operations against Iran are still in full swing, particularly as the US is seeking ways to reduce Iran’s threat to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

The carrier has served as a ready platform for American fighter jets to participate in the campaign. The fire on March 12 was not combat-related, the US military said at the time. Two sailors received medical treatment for non-life-threatening injuries and were in stable condition.

The US official said the Ford, which was sailing in the Red Sea, would be at Souda Bay in Crete “for a brief period to conduct repairs,” which would determine what can be fixed immediately and what may need to be fixed when the ship goes back to its home port after its deployment. The other ships within the Ford Carrier Strike Group are remaining where they are in the region and not joining the Ford at Souda Bay.

USNI News first reported that the Ford was heading to Souda Bay for repairs. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Friday that the Pentagon was aware of the fire on board the Ford.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/18/politics/us-ford-carrier-fire-iran-war

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US aircraft carrier moves away from Iran war for repairs after fire (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 6 hrs ago OP

"The fire on March 12 was not combat-related, the US military said at the time." LudwigPastorius 4 hrs ago #1

Laundry room fires are the most common shipboard fire. Shipwack 3 hrs ago #2

A substack I was reading earlier says the Navy is considering all possible causes LearnedHand 3 hrs ago #3

I understand what you are saying and largely agree, but this Admin really doesn't even care about the plausibility artemisia1 2 hrs ago #4

LudwigPastorius

(14,641 posts)

1. "The fire on March 12 was not combat-related, the US military said at the time."

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 10:04 PM

4 hrs ago

If it were, would they even acknowledge it? I doubt it.

Hard to believe that an aircraft carrier would have to go back to port because somebody left some clothes in the dryer too long.

Shipwack

(3,055 posts)

2. Laundry room fires are the most common shipboard fire.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 10:31 PM

3 hrs ago

For those who think it’s just a cover story:

1) most shipboard fires start in the laundry room.
2) It’s not the clothes that catch fire, but the lint in the lint filters.
3) These are not like the dryers you have in your utility room. These are industrial machines that generate a large amount of heat.

That being said, for a fire large enough to send a carrier sized ship back to port must have involved several screw-ups. There are (or were, back when I was serving) rules that if the dryer was in use, someone had to be there monitoring it. There were also rules that the lint trap had to be vacuumed after every use.

Now? I wouldn’t put it past this administration (or military in charge) to lie to cover up an attack or sabotage, but I believe (for the moment) this time they are telling the truth. The go-to story for covering something up is to say it’s an engineering problem involving classified systems. Everyone on board is going to know whether or not a laundry fire happened. There are going to be Tik-Toks and Instagram posts. Out of the several thousand people on board, there would be several sailors dumb (or disgruntled) enough to spill the beans about a coverup.

I wonder, though, about sabotage… either a purposefully set fire or something else that the fire is a cover story for*…

*yes, yes, I know I just used up a bunch of electrons saying why that was unlikely, but Kegseth et al are not the brightest crayons in the box, and might have ordered the story over the military’s objections…

LearnedHand

(5,397 posts)

3. A substack I was reading earlier says the Navy is considering all possible causes

Reply to Shipwack (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 18, 2026, 11:25 PM

3 hrs ago

Including mutiny. Not asserting it was mutiny but reporting other news outlets are indicating it’s part of the formal investigation. I don’t know who this writers is so I can’t attest his expertise.

https://open.substack.com/pub/deanblundell/p/breaking-did-sailors-aboard-the-uss

artemisia1

(1,841 posts)

4. I understand what you are saying and largely agree, but this Admin really doesn't even care about the plausibility

Reply to Shipwack (Reply #2)

Thu Mar 19, 2026, 12:16 AM

2 hrs ago

of their lies anymore or whether or not they can be easily disproven. That said, it appears that sailors have already clogged the toilets in apparent sabotage over anger at being over-deployed so another, escalated, round of sabotage to get them out of a war zone in a conflict many don't even believe in is very possible.

As to Iran, they do not, imho, wish to sink an American aircraft carrier at this time. It conflicts with their strategy and risks nuclear retaliation. They are playing chess while Trump can no longer even manage checkers and is even fumbling at Tic-Tac-Toe.

Reply to this discussion