In the Senate, Thune resurrects idea of reconciliation
Source: Roll Call
Posted March 24, 2026 at 6:38pm, Updated at 8:12pm
For Senate leaders, pursuing another budget reconciliation bill this year was once considered a no-go. But in a matter of days, its become a distinct possibility. Using the often arduous budgetary maneuver would represent a shift for both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, necessitated by Republican needs to reopen the Department of Homeland Security while passing some of their legislative priorities, key among them a voter ID bill.
But using reconciliation remains an uphill battle, as rank and file resist the idea of a process that would require broad consensus within the GOP. The idea became even more attractive for Senate GOP leaders Monday, after President Donald Trump tied funding DHS which has been shut down for more than five weeks to passage of the GOPs security legislation.
Doing both would represent a herculean task for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who faces both a slim majority and Senate rules requiring 60 votes to pass most legislation. Plan B: passing some of the voter ID bill, nicknamed the SAVE America Act by Republicans, with a reconciliation bill, which would only require a simple majority to pass.
I think with budget reconciliation, as Ive said before, you have to have a reason to do it
And we [very] well may, the South Dakota Republican said Tuesday. He said that inside the Senate Republican Conference, theres a lot of support for a budget reconciliation bill.
Read more: https://rollcall.com/2026/03/24/in-the-senate-thune-resurrects-idea-of-reconciliation/
Later in the article, REALITY sets in, which is what prompted most of the "policy riders" to be jettisoned from the Barbaric Butcher Bill -
Byrd rule
And its unclear which portions of the election bill could be included in a reconciliation bill and would survive a scrub by the chambers parliamentarian; provisions that dont touch upon spending or revenue and are just about policy are usually expunged under the Byrd Rule, which requires reconciliation bills to focus on fiscal issues.
Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., told reporters he would not be willing to override the parliamentarians rulings when asked Tuesday.
(snip)
Walleye
(44,724 posts)maxsolomon
(38,669 posts)The Filibuster kills everything else (and it will kill the SAVE Act).
The Dems' Infrastructure Bill was a Reconciliation Bill. I think the ACA was a Reconciliation Bill?
You get 2 shots at it per Congress. Why wouldn't the Repukes use it before they lose their majority?
Walleye
(44,724 posts)They are now obviously not worried about widespread voter fraud. What they are worried about is widespread voting.
maxsolomon
(38,669 posts)but the Parliamentarian strips out measures that aren't budget related. I don't see how the SAVE Act provisions are budget related but I presume the Repukes will think of some way...
Fiendish Thingy
(23,115 posts)Then he can say we gave the SAVE act our best shot, but that darned parliamentarian
BumRushDaShow
(169,406 posts)To rescind Califoenia's Clean Air Act/EV provisions through use of the Congressional Review Act - Senate votes to ignore GAO, parliamentarian to end EV rule
Fiendish Thingy
(23,115 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,406 posts)But with this crew, never say never if they can find a way to do a carve-out.
Fiendish Thingy
(23,115 posts)But it seems pretty clear republicans in Congress do not want the SAVE act to pass, as they know it will disenfranchise as many, if not more, of their voters as Dem voters.
BumRushDaShow
(169,406 posts)their delusions of the impacts of their foaming-at-the-mouth support of things they believe will only hurt blue states, eventually comes back to bite them, but only AFTER they pushed to pass their draconian pieces of legislation - e.g., - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143638473