Inflation held sticky at 3% as U.S. headed into war with Iran, key Fed gauge shows
Source: CNBC
Published Thu, Apr 9 2026 8:35 AM EDT Updated 14 Min Ago
Core inflation held above the Federal Reserves target before the recent surge in energy prices, according to a key gauge released Thursday that offers the central bank a snapshot of conditions leading into the Iran war. The core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy, rose a seasonally adjusted 3% in February, the Commerce Department reported. The all-items headline inflation measure increased 2.8%.
Both readings were in line with the Dow Jones consensus. The core annual inflation rate was 0.1 percentage point lower than in January while headline was unchanged. On a monthly basis, both core and headline prices rose 0.4%, also meeting forecasts.
The Fed uses the PCE price index as its primary yardstick and forecasting tool for inflation. The Fed, which targets 2% inflation, sees core as a better indicator of longer-term trends.
In addition to the inflation readings, the report also showed consumer spending unexpectedly down 0.1% on the month, while personal income rose 0.4%. Economists had expected spending to rise 0.6% with income up 0.4%.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/09/core-inflation-was-3percent-in-february-as-expected-key-fed-gauge-shows.html
From the source -
Link to tweet
@BEA_News
People's incomes fell 0.1% in February; spending grew 0.5%. Both figures are in current dollars.
https://bea.gov/data/income-sa
Article updated.
Previous article/headline -
Published Thu, Apr 9 2026 8:35 AM EDT Updated 1 Min Ago
Core inflation eased slightly in February before the recent surge in energy prices, according to a key gauge released Thursday that offers the Federal Reserve a snapshot of conditions leading into the Iran war.
The core personal consumption expenditures price index, which excludes food and energy, rose a seasonally adjusted 3% in February, the Commerce Department reported. The all-items headline inflation measure increased 2.8%.
Both readings were in line with the Dow Jones consensus. The core annual inflation rate was 0.1 percentage point lower than in January while headline was unchanged. On a monthly basis, both core and headline prices rose 0.4%, also meeting forecasts.
The Fed uses the PCE price index as its primary yardstick and forecasting tool for inflation. The Fed, which targets 2% inflation, sees core as a better indicator of longer-term trends.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
Original article -
The personal consumption expenditures price index was expected to show a 3% core inflation rate in February, according to the Dow Jones consensus.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
RussBLib
(10,653 posts)Yes, Ive heard there are lots of people involved with producing these reports, but we have the largest cast of liars ever assembled in our government, and truth is a foreign thing to them. Gotta make the orange anus look good, whatever it takes. Seems to me costs are rising faster than these gauges suggest.
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
Fiendish Thingy
(23,336 posts)The March inflation numbers are certain to be worse, however IIRC, the core inflation rate omits fuel costs, so the actual number will be much higher than is reported.
progree
(13,009 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 9, 2026, 10:00 AM - Edit history (1)
PCE February +0.4% (January was +0.3%);;: 12 months: 2.8% (same as in January's report);;
CORE PCE: +0.4% (January was +0.4%);; 12 months: 3.0%, (down 0.1% from January's reported 3.1%)
4/9/26
SOURCE URLS: 4/9/26 release: https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income
. . . CURRENT RELEASE - https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/personal-income-and-outlays-february-2026
. . . FULL RELEASE AND TABLES - UPDATE THIS: https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/pi0126.pdf
. . . . . . I can't find the equivalent of this one for this month's report, I'll have to dig, but gotta go shopping today
. . . PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCEPI
. . . CORE PCE DATA SERIES: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/PCEPILFE
Regular PCE aka "all items"
,
CORE PCE (excludes food and energy)

These are horrible numbers. The rolling 3 month average increase, annualized, is:
Regular PCE: 4.11%, , Core PCE: 4.43%, and both are rising
Federal Reserves' inflation target: 2%
(These are calculated using the actual index values, as are my graphs)
As usual, I prefer to present annualized figures so they can be compared to the Fed's target and to different-length time periods
Looking at the month-over-month bar charts, February 2025 was huge. It fell out of the 12-month window in this report, which is why the 12-month graphs/numbers fell slightly (this is true for both the regular PCE and the core PCE. The PCE 12-month increase stayed the same 2.8% after rounding, while the core PCE 12 month average dropped 0.1% (from 3.1% in January to 3.0% in February, when rounded)
What falls out of the 12 month window is just as important, really, honestly, and truly, as what enters the 12-month window, in determining whether the 12-month average ticks up or down.
The CORE PCE is the Federal Reserve's favorite gauge for forecasting FUTURE inflation. This doesn't fit the media's typical narrative that inflation is coming down or at worst "sticky".
Remember the graphs (and OP) on inflation are FEBRUARY. The MARCH ones are likely to be uglier, given that the US/Israeli attacks on Iran began February 28 with the spikes in oil and fertilizer prices
So, the above (February) may very likely be remembered as the "good ol' days" of the Trump II kakistocracy.
The CPI inflation report for MARCH comes out tomorrow, so we'll see how much the Iran war affected things (the US/Israeli attacks began February 28)
SamuelAdams
(57 posts)I hope all the MAGAs are enjoying his economy.
Johnny2X2X
(24,271 posts)With the explosion in gas prices, we're going to see some bad numbers.
live love laugh
(16,408 posts)Johnny2X2X
(24,271 posts)It's the same civil servants are compiling the data and creating the reports. It has not been corrupted yet and their methodology is pretty transparent. Trump's pick for to head the BLS didn't get in.
live love laugh
(16,408 posts)after many of the retirees were on paid leave for months represented a massive loss of organizational intelligence. The remaining workers who dont comply can be more easily eliminated so I hold little faith in the credibility of the info they release.
Johnny2X2X
(24,271 posts)The remaining workers will sound the alarm and then resign en masse. Of course the media won't give it the proper attention, but people who follow these things will know the moment things are off there.