Split Fifth Circuit OKs Texas Ten Commandments in Classroom Law
Source: Bloomberg Law
Texas can enforce a law requiring the Ten Commandments be displayed in public classrooms, a divided Fifth Circuit ruled.
The full US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Tuesday sided with the state, after ruling in February that it was too early to weigh challenges to a similar Louisiana measure.
We conclude the Texas law does not violate either the Establishment Clause or the Free Exercise Clause, Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan wrote for a nine-judge majority, all consisting of Republican appointees. Eight judges dissented from the ruling.
A three-judge panel earlier found the Louisiana law was unconstitutional, as it violated the First Amendments Establishment Clause. But the majority of the Fifth Circuits 17 active judgeswhich includes six Trump appointeesvoted in favor of rehearing the case, and heard arguments in that case and over the Texas law in January.
An attorney for the laws challengers, Jonathan Youngwood, told the court that Supreme Court precedent set in a challenge to a similar state law still applies and forecloses this case. But some of the conservative judges said the high court had set aside the Establishment Clause test used then, and questioned if the Supreme Court ruling was still good law.
Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/split-fifth-circuit-oks-texas-ten-commandments-in-classroom-law
Link to tweet
?s=20
ananda
(35,309 posts)Irony is dead.
Klarkashton
(5,356 posts)bluestarone
(22,330 posts)EVIL America has ever witnessed in our country!!
BumRushDaShow
(170,872 posts)But would today's SCOTUS throw away stare decisis again?
TomSlick
(13,061 posts)The rethuglican majority on SCOTUS has no regard for stare decisis.
angrychair
(12,371 posts)We are fucking fucked. Slowly by surely that are bleeding Christianity into public schools and there doesn't appear to be any way to stop it.
State mandatory ten commandments is a religious requirement mandated by state law. I don't see any other way to interpret that. Especially if no other religions are allowed to post their religious doctrine in schools.
sinkingfeeling
(57,880 posts)dalton99a
(94,767 posts)
walkingman
(10,997 posts)I personally do not want the government to define morality.
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,308 posts)Federal Appeals Court Upholds Texas Ten Commandments Law
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/us/appeals-court-upholds-texas-ten-commandments-law.html
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said the law does not violate the Constitution. The plaintiffs said they planned to ask the Supreme Court to reverse the decision.

A Ten Commandments poster in an English classroom at Fossil Ridge High School in Fort Worth. Desiree Rios for The New York Times
By Pooja Salhotra
April 21, 2026
A federal appeals court on Tuesday narrowly upheld a Texas law that requires public schools to display posters of the Ten Commandments in classrooms. ... By 9-to-8, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the law does not violate the separation of church and state, reversing two lower court decisions. The court also ruled the measure does not restrict parents' right to direct their children's religious upbringing.
"Students are neither catechized on the Commandments nor taught to adopt them," the ruling said. "Nor are teachers commanded to proselytize students who ask about the displays or contradict students who disagree with them."
Since Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, signed a law in 2025 mandating the religious displays, families of various faith backgrounds have challenged it, arguing that the law amounted to state endorsement of religion. The law was passed amid a broader conservative push to infuse Christianity into public schools, and several other Republican-led states have passed similar laws.
The organizations representing the 15 Texas families who filed the lawsuit said in a statement that they were disappointed in the decision and planned to ask the Supreme Court to reverse it.
{snip}
Pooja Salhotra covers breaking news across the United States.
https://www.nytimes.com/by/pooja-salhotra
mahatmakanejeeves
(70,308 posts)Education
Texas can force schools to post Ten Commandments, federal appeals court rules
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the state can enforce its 2025 law requiring public schools to display donated posters of the Ten Commandments.
Jaden Edison, Texas Tribune Posted onApril 21, 2026, 10:44 PM
Texas can enforce a state law requiring public schools to display posters of the Ten Commandments in classrooms, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday. ... A majority of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Texas officials' favor, concluding that the law does not establish an official state religion.
"It does not tell churches or synagogues or mosques what to believe or how to worship or whom to employ as priests, rabbis, or imams," according to the ruling. (1) "It punishes no one who rejects the Ten Commandments, no matter the reason."
The court heard arguments in January after 16 families sued over the law, alleging that it amounted to state leaders promoting their interpretation of Christianity over other faiths.
All 17 active judges on the court listened to the case -- Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District -- alongside a similar challenge in Louisiana, the first state to pass a Ten Commandments requirement for its public schools. (2) The court cleared the way in February for Louisiana to fully implement its law.
After Tuesday's decision, the civil rights organizations representing the families expressed disappointment.
{snip}
(1) https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/press/Opinion_1.pdf
(2) https://www.au.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Rabbi-Nathan-v.-Alamo-Heights-ISD-Complaint-7.2.25.pdf
muriel_volestrangler
(106,389 posts)I can see how they could argue that it's allowed, because you can say that it's one of several things that could be posted. But a law forcing everyone to use one religion's claims (and the first half of the commandments are specific to that religion, rather than general ethical rules) is so obviously against the First Amendment that it's ridiculous.
Smilo
(2,046 posts)and shouldn't they be written in aramic or hebrew or may be greek?
bluestarone
(22,330 posts)students to pass a course to graduate? THAT would be their killer vote getting. VOTE THEM OUT!!!