Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(171,016 posts)
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 07:33 AM 17 hrs ago

Naval escorts will likely be needed when Strait of Hormuz reopens, Chevron CEO says

Source: CBS News

Updated on: April 24, 2026 / 9:59 PM EDT


Washington — Chevron's chief executive said it's likely that the U.S. Navy may need to escort commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz once it reopens in order to ensure a level of security.

The standoff over the strait has intensified amid Iran's threats against the critical channel and a U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, effectively closing it. The tensions have led to several maritime incidents in recent days.

Asked Thursday by "Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan what Chevron would need to see to feel confident to send a ship through the strait, CEO Mike Wirth said, "we'd have to believe that our people on the ship will be safe, the cargo will be safe, and they can be transited with a high degree of confidence."

Wirth said the decision would be made "in collaboration" with the U.S. Navy and other military organizations around the world. "I think in the early days, it's very likely that you could see naval escorts, because I think some of the risks are not just mines that could be placed in the strait, but they could be also risks that could come from the land in other forms," Wirth said

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/strait-of-hormuz-naval-escorts-chevron-ceo-face-the-nation-interview/

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Naval escorts will likely be needed when Strait of Hormuz reopens, Chevron CEO says (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago OP
The policeman of the world gab13by13 17 hrs ago #1
We've been the "police" for quite sometime, keeping pirates in check. mymomwasright 17 hrs ago #6
We are now the pirates. travelingthrulife 12 hrs ago #22
I don't know a lot about this, what good would a naval escort do? Srkdqltr 17 hrs ago #2
They can certainly shoot down some missiles & drones EX500rider 13 hrs ago #15
update Whip-poor-will 17 hrs ago #3
Thanks a lot Donny your pointless and un-winnable war to distract from Epstein has really fucked things up. Botany 17 hrs ago #4
It worked. I even read one left person write something like, we do have to forget about the files for now C Moon 11 hrs ago #23
Do not pay attention to the fact that Trump. Botany 9 hrs ago #31
This message was self-deleted by its author RandySF 17 hrs ago #5
Your belly button needs an escort? Pics? twodogsbarking 16 hrs ago #7
I don't know whether the oil tankers need escorts or not, but I do know that this administration's priorities jls4561 15 hrs ago #8
Escorts won't work. They're just additional targets. paleotn 15 hrs ago #9
No, the current marked channel in the middle is narrow & close to Iran EX500rider 13 hrs ago #16
Not enough assets in theater for one. Not enough assets period given even reduced strait traffic. paleotn 12 hrs ago #21
Thanks. Knowledge is good. Botany 9 hrs ago #30
Just my 2 cents. In my mind, it's all about risk. paleotn 7 hrs ago #33
Melania needs to be sent there . . . SarcasticSatyr 15 hrs ago #10
In unrelated news, the Trump Administration pushes to end home-heating assistance for the poor. Midnight Writer 15 hrs ago #11
They should ask the insurance companies what they would require to insure the vessels ToxMarz 15 hrs ago #12
No Problem. Israel will be glad to help. They can buy new naval vessels and send them down the Suez ChicagoTeamster 14 hrs ago #13
Don't forget the 15 mini subs sitting quietly on the bottom Submariner 14 hrs ago #14
Boy, Trump really wants a cut of that action. ananda 13 hrs ago #17
This whole closing of the strait was such an unnecessary distraction from the Epstein files kimbutgar 12 hrs ago #18
That's a lot of extra fuel we don't have. rickford66 12 hrs ago #19
How nice that Chevron decides what the military should do . Now we know who they protect. Autumn 12 hrs ago #20
The Navy has very few ship's suitable as escorts pfitz59 11 hrs ago #24
They can't even provide enough food for the crews. FoxNewsSucks 9 hrs ago #27
It has always amazed me popsdenver 11 hrs ago #25
Yes, for 400 years bucolic_frolic 11 hrs ago #26
Let them pay for it then. FoxNewsSucks 9 hrs ago #28
With all this destruction of Iran's military Trump/Hegseth brag about, WHY are they letting Iranian forces board and cap Norrrm 9 hrs ago #29
We didn't need this under any democratic president RainCaster 8 hrs ago #32
Will the insurance companies cover the vessels if they need a naval escort? I wonder. If they won't, then the strait Fil1957 6 hrs ago #34
If you need an armed escort, it ain't 'open." Iggo 5 hrs ago #35

mymomwasright

(446 posts)
6. We've been the "police" for quite sometime, keeping pirates in check.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 08:00 AM
17 hrs ago

Now we are the tools of fools, creating chaos and enforcing extortion on a grand scale.

Srkdqltr

(9,857 posts)
2. I don't know a lot about this, what good would a naval escort do?
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 07:40 AM
17 hrs ago

The escort can't stop the tanker hitting a mine or someone shoting a missile or drone.

Whip-poor-will

(373 posts)
3. update
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 07:42 AM
17 hrs ago

Your ships are worthless scrap in the drone age .......naval escorts to rape the strait ....good luck with following the stupid one.

Botany

(77,617 posts)
4. Thanks a lot Donny your pointless and un-winnable war to distract from Epstein has really fucked things up.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 07:46 AM
17 hrs ago

Prior to operation Epstein Fury the Strait of Hormuz was open and 260 girls between 7 and 12 were
not dead or wounded from 2 American Tomahawk Missiles.

C Moon

(13,689 posts)
23. It worked. I even read one left person write something like, we do have to forget about the files for now
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 01:43 PM
11 hrs ago

because this idiotic attack on Iran needs our attention. I think it may have been here where I read it.

Botany

(77,617 posts)
31. Do not pay attention to the fact that Trump.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 04:00 PM
9 hrs ago

.. is mentioned more in the Epstein files than is Jeffery Epstein.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

jls4561

(3,223 posts)
8. I don't know whether the oil tankers need escorts or not, but I do know that this administration's priorities
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 09:13 AM
15 hrs ago

are such that they think Kashyap Patel’s bit of stuff needs an FBI Swat team escort for security.

paleotn

(22,495 posts)
9. Escorts won't work. They're just additional targets.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 09:28 AM
15 hrs ago

The navigable lanes are narrow, with very limited room to maneuver. The Navy's standard RIM-174 Standard ERAM is still $4M a pop vs. Iran's $50K per drone. And that does nothing about mines. Did we just forget all about the Samuel B. Roberts? The Navy didn't. This is madness.

EX500rider

(12,655 posts)
16. No, the current marked channel in the middle is narrow & close to Iran
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 11:15 AM
13 hrs ago

However the water is deep right up to the coast of Oman/UAE and the escorts would have more intercept time from there.
No reason the channel has to be in the middle.
And drones can be shot down with 5" naval gunfire & CIWS as proved in the Red Sea from Houthis launching them at the US Navy.
A Apache or A-10 overhead would help too.
Minesweeping would have to be done obviously.

paleotn

(22,495 posts)
21. Not enough assets in theater for one. Not enough assets period given even reduced strait traffic.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 12:55 PM
12 hrs ago

DDGs aren't designed for escort duty. Gee, wouldn't it be nice to have some frigates right about now? But alas, we don't. And you want to risk a hundred million dollar tanker and it's cargo on 5" accuracy? Oh, hell no. It proved spotty in the Red Sea, thus the reliance on missile interdiction and DDGs running dangerously low on missiles. And the drones just kept coming. Couple that with drone swarms Iran is capable of and I'm sure you see the problem.

Air interdiction is also tricky. You've got to be in the right places at the right times and the damn things are tough to pick up long range. So vectoring air assets becomes a problem. Want to risk a tanker or two on "where they hell did those come from?!" vectoring? And those air assets are also going to take fire. You think the Iranians are just going to sit and watch the show? Not likely.

As far as electronic drone countermeasures, do you really think the US Navy absorbed the lessons from Ukraine by now? Not the Navy I once served in. It usually takes getting smacked in the head for the current war and its doctrines to sink in, get trained on, and become proficient at.

And mine clearing isn't as straightforward as you think. Particularly under fire. Either with surface or air assets. Particularly since it's not a glamorous occupation and training in real world situations may be quite thin. That's usually the case for training that's not enjoyable. And assets are limited. Lets not forget that.

Seems your whole premise involves turning the straight itself into a hot war zone. That's really not going to work. And what happens when we try to transfer "paper" understanding to the real world. And why any commercial ship owner with any sense isn't going to go for such.

Botany

(77,617 posts)
30. Thanks. Knowledge is good.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 03:40 PM
9 hrs ago

And don't the Chinese made jet drones that
Iran is using have electronic counter measures that block a lot of tracking measures used to detect them? A swarm of them could ruin an aircraft carrier.

Btw isn't this going to be U.S. tax dollars paying for the protection of PRIVATE fossil
fuel company's profits?

paleotn

(22,495 posts)
33. Just my 2 cents. In my mind, it's all about risk.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 06:01 PM
7 hrs ago

And a kinetic escalation in the strait itself is going to send risk through the roof. That's what keeps tankers and LNG carriers swinging at anchor. Risk and associated insurance cost, if they can even get insurance. Iran is a large country with numerous places to hide things. Limited air strikes, as we've seen so far, aren't going to degrade their capabilities enough to reduce that risk. That would take a much larger mobilization which would make Nov. even worse for Republicans.

We're paying to protect Gulf producers and doing a poor job of it. Anyone with oil outside the Gulf, US frackers, North Sea, Nigeria, Russia, etc., etc., are making out like bandits. Their costs didn't go up much but the price of their product increased ~50%. In that way, Trump's disaster is benefiting US and other oil producers. Just not directly.

Midnight Writer

(25,584 posts)
11. In unrelated news, the Trump Administration pushes to end home-heating assistance for the poor.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 10:01 AM
15 hrs ago

Billions for the billionaires, misery for the needy.

The most Christian Administration ever!

ToxMarz

(3,011 posts)
12. They should ask the insurance companies what they would require to insure the vessels
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 10:03 AM
15 hrs ago

That's what the oil companies/ship owners will rely on before they will send them through.

ChicagoTeamster

(1,120 posts)
13. No Problem. Israel will be glad to help. They can buy new naval vessels and send them down the Suez
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 10:15 AM
14 hrs ago

and then up to Hormuz. And to fund it Israel can cancel their free college education and healthcare. No more 3.8 Billion per year from the US. End the additional emergency military aid. They already received 18 Billion.

If Jewish Americans and Evangelicals want to donate money to Israel to fill the gaps they can. That's their prerogative.

Oh, and Oil CEOs should proudly lead the way in their yachts proudly displaying large US and Israeli flags.

Submariner

(13,396 posts)
14. Don't forget the 15 mini subs sitting quietly on the bottom
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 10:57 AM
14 hrs ago

waiting for American warships to wander into Iranian waters. They have full size torpedoes.



Iran's Ghadir submarines are seen in the southern port of Bandar Abbas in Persian Gulf, Iran, August 8, 2010. (AP Photo/Iranian Defense Ministry, Vahid Reza Alaei/File

kimbutgar

(27,404 posts)
18. This whole closing of the strait was such an unnecessary distraction from the Epstein files
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 12:37 PM
12 hrs ago

It should be called the Epstein closing of the strait.

rickford66

(6,079 posts)
19. That's a lot of extra fuel we don't have.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 12:42 PM
12 hrs ago

Maybe Jared could chip in a couple billion from the stash he's making.

Autumn

(48,985 posts)
20. How nice that Chevron decides what the military should do . Now we know who they protect.
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 12:47 PM
12 hrs ago

Because we know the Trump will do what they want

pfitz59

(12,830 posts)
24. The Navy has very few ship's suitable as escorts
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 01:43 PM
11 hrs ago

Trump and Hegseth are using what we have well beyond programmed deployments. Wear and tear are increasing. Morale is plummeting. Suitable ships and trained people are not infinite resources. Hegseth would have learned this if he's advanced beyond a REMF Major.

popsdenver

(2,433 posts)
25. It has always amazed me
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 01:52 PM
11 hrs ago

at just how much of our taxes go towards Corporations..............

As one point.......think about how all the Cargo, Container ships, Oil Tankers, etc cross the oceans every year without being hijacked.......WHY? The fear of the U.S. Navy patrolling the waters around the world is why.........

It has been going on for decades and decades and has been present since the 1800's, and grown ever since. It grew a lot under Reagan, alot more under Cheney's regime, and has shot up dramatically in the past 10+ years.......

One of the simplest definitions of FASCISM, is the merger of Government and Corporations.....surprise, surprise.

When you get down to the net/net, the Corporations rule the politicians! And the Republicans have the very best politicians their money can buy...........

This was GREATLY accelerated by the 2010 ruling, by the Supreme Court, Citizens United....It was the final nail in the coffin, the last straw, and the kiss of death to our democracy, economy, Constitution, rule of law, our citizens, etc

I would venture a guess that if you walked down the street, and asked people what do you know about Citizens United, that 90+% would look at you with a blank stare, totally dumfounded.

The perfect title, for a book about the past 46+ years would be: WHILE THE NATION SLEPT.........And they are still sleeping...

Most people, since Reagan was corruptly "Installed" in the White House, have been wandering down the Jungle path, swatting at mosquitoes, and totally oblivious to the herd of charging elephants.....Pun Intended.....

bucolic_frolic

(55,508 posts)
26. Yes, for 400 years
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 01:56 PM
11 hrs ago

This Iran War is a big event in the history of the world. Armenian genocide was smaller in geographic size. This is a whole ancient civilization.

Norrrm

(5,334 posts)
29. With all this destruction of Iran's military Trump/Hegseth brag about, WHY are they letting Iranian forces board and cap
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 03:39 PM
9 hrs ago

With all this destruction of Iran's military Trump/Hegseth brag about, WHY are they letting Iranian forces board and capture large ships?

WHY are they letting Iran close the strait?

Fil1957

(776 posts)
34. Will the insurance companies cover the vessels if they need a naval escort? I wonder. If they won't, then the strait
Sat Apr 25, 2026, 06:26 PM
6 hrs ago

will still be effectively closed, even if Trump declares it "open".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Naval escorts will likely...