Not anymore.

He has for decades been a strong advocate on the environment including climate change, but it is impossible to overlook his person life.

He was born into his largely ceremonial role and there is no reason to think he would have been prominent in anything if he was not born a prince.

He may still be coming because the Prime Minister may see him visiting as a way to improve the UK's position with Trump. Therefore, I do not expect him to push Trump on climate change or backing down on Iran.

From observation, any push on an issue publicly seems to make Trump double down, rather than back down. On Iran, Trump is more concerned with having people credit him with a better than Obama's deal and setting the middle east up for peace. It is not clear there is anything King Charles could say or do to move him in a better direction.

On Iran, the vain Trump faces a very real possibility that he will fail by his own standards. His stated goals are all over the place, but are by and large not meetable.
Iran will not agree to regime change and we can't achieve it.

Getting a comprehensive deal like the international deal achieved through excellent diplomacy, backed by outstanding technical teams is not likely sending a slumlord venture capitalist and a real estate conman and the least likable VP with a similar lack of experience with all three sharing an unwillingness to listen to career diplomats and scientists.

Although there was always concern that Iran could try to close the Straits of Hormus, this war pushed them to do it and they now know for a fact that they can do it and it creates havoc for the rest of the world. If this ends in a face saving agreement, in reality it leads to a stronger, more radical Iran.

Where the JCPOA resulted in closing off for more than a decade the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb, it also could (with no President Trump) in a world where both sides kept their promises led to greater trust and potentially resolving other issues. Trump, on the other hand gives us the legacy of unilaterally ending agreements and later, engineering a sneak attack while publicly negotiating.

That POS

Not that I'm surprised but this administration cannot even figure out which flags to hang for a visiting dignitary. Pathetic.

I'm pretty sure it was him but this isn't the first time.

who cheated on his wife for..?

Didn't Epstein have a flag?

education system.
You'd think they might google it though...

This symbolizes the Trump administration. Inept. Incompetent. Inane.

Imbecilic, intent on destruction.

Pedo will be sure to insult the King of England in his we-won-you-lost way.

in everything they say and do.

As Charles Pierce often says, this will never not be funny.

You win the internet today!! At least for me!!

Thank you for this!!!! Hubby and I are huge fans of TBBT

Thank you for my first LOL today!

So the flags aren’t entirely inappropriate

D.C. could have mixed things up even more:

List of Commonwealth Realms where the Btish monarch is head of state(15):
United Kingdom
Antigua and Barbuda
Australia
The Bahamas
Belize
Canada
Grenada
Jamaica
New Zealand
Papua New Guinea
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Solomon Islands
Tuvalu

Anthony Albanese is not coming here for a "state visit", so the UK flag (which represents all under its purview) should be the appropriate flag.

but he’s not Head of State. King Charles III is.

D.C. honors them with their flag as a "sovereign independent", otherwise this wouldn't have "made the news".

How to say you are lazy and ignorant without saying it out loud.

Googled: "Approximately 20 flags worldwide feature the Union Jack, including 5 national flags and 15 territorial or subnational flags."

It's a colonialism from the past.

The UK Union flag itself is a compounded flag from 4 sources.
St George's cross.
St Andrew's cross.
St Patrick's cross.
Original flag of Great Brittain.