Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(171,528 posts)
Mon May 4, 2026, 03:30 PM 7 hrs ago

Trump administration claims food aid fraud but critics say 'there's no evidence'

Source: The Guardian

Mon 4 May 2026 07.00 EDT
Last modified on Mon 4 May 2026 13.39 EDT


The Trump administration’s attack on the 87-year-old food aid program that supports tens of millions of low-income Americans escalated last week as the agriculture secretary, Brooke Rollins, claimed that 14,000 Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (Snap) recipients included owners of luxury vehicles such as Ferraris, Bentleys and Teslas. Critics charge that the broadside is part of a disinformation campaign aimed at undermining a benefit relied on by some of the most vulnerable people in the US.

Rollins did not cite the unnamed state or where this data and its claims came from, but it went viral among conservatives on social media with Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Rand Paul, Congressman Tim Burchett, and actor James Woods quoting the post. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which administers the $57bn program, would not comment on the record and would not verify Rollins’s claims, which stem from an analysis by the Foundation for Government Accountability, an organization that has long advocated for cutting and reducing Snap and other federal government benefits.

The report says its conclusions stem from 2023 data obtained by an unnamed contractor from an anonymous state. It does not provide any information on the alleged Snap recipients or how their identities were matched to car registrations. The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) would not provide its data or methodology and did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Congresswoman Jahana Hayes, ranking member of the nutrition and foreign agriculture subcommittee, said she was highly skeptical of the data. “First of all, if it were true, it would have been cited with the state and what happened,” said Hayes. “I just don’t buy the secretary saying that they have all this information as a gotcha moment, while not also simultaneously saying we plan to hold these people accountable for defrauding the system and taking food away from the people who really need it.”. Hayes said claims of fraud and abuse have often been made without evidence and that cases of provable fraud should be prosecuted, not be used to cut and attack Snap at the expense of people who need and rely on it.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/04/trump-administration-snap-food-aid



The old Raygun "welfare queen" playbook while the GOP literally, arrogantly, and out in the open, robs us in plain sight.

The report says its conclusions stem from 2023 data obtained by an unnamed contractor from an anonymous state. It does not provide any information on the alleged Snap recipients or how their identities were matched to car registrations. The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) would not provide its data or methodology and did not respond to multiple requests for comment.


Because it's made up shit.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump administration claims food aid fraud but critics say 'there's no evidence' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
If you make a claim, show evidence or it's BS. Permanut 7 hrs ago #1
They're trying to eliminate social programs with "fraud" claims and work requirements jmbar2 7 hrs ago #2
Asset tests vs incomes bucolic_frolic 7 hrs ago #3
In Pa. orangecrush 2 hrs ago #6
In California EuterpeThelo 1 hr ago #8
Utterly agree. orangecrush 49 min ago #9
Something about lamp posts. orangecrush 2 hrs ago #4
This message was self-deleted by its author orangecrush 2 hrs ago #5
The welfare Rebl2 1 hr ago #7

jmbar2

(8,110 posts)
2. They're trying to eliminate social programs with "fraud" claims and work requirements
Mon May 4, 2026, 03:41 PM
7 hrs ago

Get people mad at the "welfare queens", and make them work so that they fall off the "benefits cliff". The benefits are too low to live on, but you can't earn enough to get up off the floor.

The work requirements thing is particularly sneaky and pernicious in my book. I have no doubt that it is deliberately engineered to purge the social safety net.

bucolic_frolic

(55,628 posts)
3. Asset tests vs incomes
Mon May 4, 2026, 03:45 PM
7 hrs ago

"In most states, SNAP (food stamps) does not have an asset test for most households. Through a policy called Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE), over 40 states have eliminated asset limits to simplify enrollment and encourage savings."

EuterpeThelo

(423 posts)
8. In California
Mon May 4, 2026, 09:55 PM
1 hr ago

in the early 90s, they kept switching workers on me and even though I submitted ALL my forms on time, my (what was called) AFDC checks were often late, even WEEKS late. I worked full time for barely above minimum wage (AND carried a full load of units at school with straight As while raising a toddler) yet I had to spend EVERY 15 minute break I had at work calling their office begging for the checks I was owed. It's a damn good thing my daycare provider was both exceedingly patient and had a husband with a good job.

And then they threatened to cut me off because I didn't show up to the resume workshop at 2pm...on a workday. And they'd hound me, leaving messages on my answering machine starting at 7am asking for forms I'd already given them WEEKS ago.

All this, and the one time I slipped up and accidentally mentioned that I had some vinyl records I'd been collecting since I was 12, one of them said I was likely exceeding the asset test and would have to start selling my albums before they'd reinstate me. (This was during a time when the value of vinyl was down to nubs, not like today...they probably weren't even worth what I paid for them at that point.)

Ultimately, I demanded and received a written apology from the head of welfare in San Mateo County.

Those school units paid off, though. I pay three times more in taxes a year than I earned at that job...so tell me again how helping me for three and a half years was such a drag on the system.

Fuck these heartless monsters. I'm a pacifist and would never do anything myself, but I'll just say that I hope every one of them gets every bit of karma they deserve.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration clai...