Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asks public to back judicial independence
Source: Politico
05/12/2026 11:41 PM EDT
DALLAS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson urged Americans on Tuesday to defend the judicial system against salvos that jeopardize its independence, warning that such threats have the potential to do serious damage to American democracy.
Equal justice under law is a key tenet to freedom in our society, and in order to have that, you have to have an independent judiciary one that is not beholden to the political branches or beholden to people, Jackson said during an appearance before hundreds of students at Southern Methodist University. I just wish that people really focused on that and, therefore, stood up in some ways for the judiciary, when people judges are being attacked and undermined, that is really an attack on our society.
Jackson did not mention any specific attacks on the judiciary, although since the Supreme Court struck down a key aspect of President Donald Trumps tariff policy earlier this year, Trump has unleashed an unusually caustic series of attacks on the three members of the courts conservative majority who joined the liberal justices in the 6-3 ruling.
Trump has also called for the impeachment of district court judges who have ruled against the administration on other issues, like deporting alleged gang members to a notorious anti-terrorism prison in El Salvador without due process. Those calls prompted Chief Justice John Roberts to declare publicly that he believes that judges should not face impeachment due to disagreement with their rulings.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/12/justice-ketanji-brown-jackson-judicial-independence-00918230
RainCaster
(13,870 posts)Citizens United - remember that decision and all it has done to make the rich far more powerful?
How about giving the President free reign to do anything he wants as long as it's under the guise of "presidential"?
How about removing all the protections of the Voting Rights Act?
People have a right to be pissed at the courts. IMO, she is clueless.
djacq
(1,784 posts)"one that is not beholden to the political branches or beholden to people
The VRA is just as old as I am.
I had more voting rights during my life than my late parents did during the first half of their lives. My parents migrated from Jim Crow south.
Now I'm looking at my adult children, who will not fully enjoy those rights until the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act is passed and signed.
SCOTUS is the political arm of the Republican Party.
DemocracyForever
(174 posts)DemocracyForever
(174 posts)O'Connor, Thomas, Kennedy, and Scalia were beholden to Bush Sr. for their appointments while Rehnquist had a grudge against Senator Al Gore Sr. This doesn't meet my definition of judicial independence.