Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,382 posts)
Fri May 22, 2026, 03:00 AM 10 hrs ago

Nancy Mace proposes ban on naturalized citizens in US government

Source: USA Today

Updated May 21, 2026, 3:01 p.m. ET


U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace is pushing to bar naturalized Americans from serving in Congress or other high-levels of the federal government.

A Republican from South Carolina, Mace has unveiled legislation aiming to ban foreign-born U.S. citizens from becoming federal judges and being appointed to Senate-confirmed positions. Mace, 48, called her push a "long overdue joint resolution" for the constitutional amendment.

"This is the very same standard the President and Vice President are already required to meet," Mace, proposing a constitutional amendment for the ban, wrote in an X post on May 20. "The people writing America’s laws, confirming America’s judges, and representing America on the world stage should have one loyalty: America. Not any other country."

Mace's push comes as multiple courts across the nation have issued decisions on birthright citizenship after President Donald Trump's February executive order directing federal agencies not to recognize the citizenship of babies born in the United States if neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/05/21/nancy-mace-ban-naturalized-citizens-federal-office/90193034007/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nancy Mace proposes ban on naturalized citizens in US government (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago OP
Eight of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence were born outside of America. SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #1
Idiotic. Get rid of Section 3 violators instead nuxvomica 9 hrs ago #2
It wouldn't get past the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. no_hypocrisy 8 hrs ago #3
We already have two tiers of 'society' in this country. OldBaldy1701E 4 hrs ago #4
Agreed, but not all are the result of legislation that is challenged in court. no_hypocrisy 4 hrs ago #5
That is true. OldBaldy1701E 35 min ago #8
These monsters are irredeemable. travelingthrulife 3 hrs ago #6
Would this include the position of First Lady? Bayard 1 hr ago #7
_ LudwigPastorius 32 min ago #9

SunSeeker

(58,375 posts)
1. Eight of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence were born outside of America.
Fri May 22, 2026, 03:28 AM
9 hrs ago

This includes individuals from England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.

Would Mace rip up the Declaration of Independence because 8 of the signers are not natural born citizens?

Mace is such a piece of racist shit. If she was worried about high officials who are not loyal to this country, she would be moving to impeach Trump.

nuxvomica

(14,224 posts)
2. Idiotic. Get rid of Section 3 violators instead
Fri May 22, 2026, 04:02 AM
9 hrs ago

That's already in the 14th Amendment and, if you include the "aid and comfort" violators, that's most of the Republicans in Congress and the Executive Branch, including, of course, the so-called President. That should be the response to Mace's profoundly stupid idea.

no_hypocrisy

(55,400 posts)
3. It wouldn't get past the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Fri May 22, 2026, 04:44 AM
8 hrs ago

You can't have two different tiers of treatment for U.S. citizens, no matter where they've been born.

OldBaldy1701E

(11,575 posts)
8. That is true.
Fri May 22, 2026, 12:53 PM
35 min ago

Most of it is cultural/financial. The issue is that the courts really don't seem like they want to get involved in a lot of the cases of this type. They are messy and can lead to some serious 'piranha pool' from social media if one word can be used against the judges or the lawyers.

I remember in class when we were taught about the 'caste' system in school. I remember thinking to myself, 'Actually, we do have the same thing here, despite the teacher's loud proclamations that we don't.'.

That was 50 years ago. It has basically not changed since then.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nancy Mace proposes ban o...