I’d look forward to my day in court.

This will require a local (NOLA) lawyer who will mos likely work toward a "make it go away" judgment.

Remember, we don't have a sane DOJ, we have a branch of the executive branch whose mission is to act as the enforcement of whatever a despot wants.

This will have to be dealt with locally.....for now.

Who called them in and under what pretense?

are pro-Trump. They would have the legal authority to remove anyone they wanted for pretty much any reason they wanted. They are paying for the venue, so it isn't a "public" event.

"Several of the researchers said they believed they were removed partly because the association feared repercussions from the Trump administration."
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/05/well/ada-conference-diabetes-trump.html

Of course political stuff is usually reserved to personal conversations, if it comes up at all.

I have personally avoided political conversation at these types of meetings myself.

As far as the reign of the Orange Pedophile I'm sure most scientists are clear on where we stand. The AAAS mailings have certainly referred to the attack on science.

All protest is TERRORISM! Throw them in the hoosegow!

Republicans are VERY thin skinned when not knowing things

there is no situation a cop can't make worse. A conference about human health for fuck's sake!

doc consensus conferences in my day, some have been very loud with different opinions as to treatment options being discussed, never were security or law enforcement involved.

They don't go to a conference and face off with the police. I'm a diabetic and have dealt with quacks about the disease over the years.
I will with hold any judgment of the activity until the science they have is proven.

So what you say is absolutely not true.

My statement stating that I will wait for scientific evidence is true. I don't like being called a liar.

And they didn't confront the police, police confronted them.

They must prove the science to their peers.

Which Trump administration is proposing.