FCC Wants to Kill Burner Phones By Forcing Telecoms to Get All Customers' IDs
Source: 404 Media
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) wants to make it effectively impossible for people to buy what many call burner phonesa phone not explicitly linked to your identity at the point of purchasewhich would impact privacy-conscious people, to domestic abuse survivors, to journalists, and many more. The FCC plans to do this by legally forcing the countrys telecoms to store a wealth of personal information about essentially all phone customers, including a government issued identification number and their physical address, alarming privacy advocates and civil rights activists who compare the measures to those from authoritarian countries where it can be difficult to buy a mobile phone plan without giving up your identity.
The proposed change would drastically shake up how people obtain phone plans in the U.S., and have all sorts of privacy and cybersecurity knock-on effects. The FCC is proposing the data collection partly as a way to combat scammers, with telecoms being required to collect other information on business and foreign customers like the intended use case of their bulk phone plan purchase and their IP address. But the changes would mean telecoms collect data on all new and renewing customers, and the FCC provides a long list of other things that the collected data could help authorities with.
For decades, civil libertarians have looked overseas at authoritarian countries where the government requires people to register to get a mobile phone to ensure they can be tracked. We never thought that would happen here, Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Unions (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project told 404 Media in an email. But make no mistake: with this rulemaking, the government is contemplating taking away peoples ability to get a burner phone, which will hurt low-income people, domestic violence victims, and anyone else who cares about their privacy.
-snip-
One section stresses that the newly collected data would help law enforcement to more easily identify callers that use the network to perpetuate crimes by ensuring that voice providers have accurate and complete customer information. It goes on to ask if the data would help identify people buying and selling illicit goods; the investigation of fraud, espionage, or influence operations that undermine national security, and address abuse in text messaging networks.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.404media.co/fcc-wants-to-kill-burner-phones-by-forcing-telecoms-to-get-all-customers-ids/
Initech
(109,458 posts)mdbl
(8,849 posts)I get crap calls all day from misidentified numbers. Brendan Carrtel needs to fix the shit he already has in front of him.
WestMichRad
(3,457 posts)This is further proof.
2na fisherman
(383 posts)Big Brother is watching and listening. Soon it might be illegal to turn off your TV/PC/phone and the concept of privacy will be eliminated for "national security" reasons because of increasing mass casualty terrorist events. People may even vote for this out of fear and a need for a greater sense of security. Such a total surveillance environment can be managed and cross-linked among all platforms by AI bots. Too sci-fi? I'm too old to see it come to fruition but it seems like this could really happen in the near future.
Jack Valentino
(5,322 posts):
:
OK, I've often thought of it, but never actually done it... (since the phone I have now is registered!)
genxlib
(6,174 posts)But I read a lot of spy and crime novels and this is a primary plot point. I realize it is fiction but it does ring true that they are being used for nefarious purposes beyond basic privacy protections.
Seems like there has to be a way to do this in a way that works for both sides of the argument but I do see both sides.
The Madcap
(2,108 posts)Unfortunately, that would necessitate a certain level of trust in the government to not misuse your info for surveillance or sell it to businesses so they can sell you stuff you don't need.
I wouldn't trust the current "government" to do the right thing in that regard.
ret5hd
(22,665 posts)ill certainly take 24 hour surveillance to make sure im absolutely safe.
that will work, wont it?
wont it?
Jilly_in_VA
(14,717 posts)But I object to this whole idea of tracing everybody 24/7, which is the eventual aim, no matter what their argument. Fuck you, Brendan Carr, and the elephant you rode in on.
efhmc
(17,117 posts)I think there will be underground sources for regular folks and nefarious sorts.
dave99
(349 posts)ImNotGod
(1,286 posts)Karma13612
(5,034 posts)I have had pay as you go (Tracfone) for about 20 years. I have gotten new phones over the years and had to change my number a couple times. But, as soon as it was possible to port my telephone number to a new phone, I have now had my current phone number for a long time. Im on my 2nd Apple iPhone ( or is it my third?).
Tracfone knows who I am. I had to register with them and I log on to their website to see my current phone service expiration date and my balance of data and text and minutes.
Does this put me in the category of a burner phone? Hopefully not.
SpankMe
(3,779 posts)This is because you have an account with Tracfone and you buy time as you go.
Burner phones are stand-alone phones that require no account. They are completely untethered to an individual. You buy it, activate it it without going online or creating an account. Then you call your uncle Larry's liquor store and ask if they have Prince Albert in a can.
Their official rationle is to combat evil because drug dealers, kidnappers and terrorists use burner phones to commit crime and escape detection.
Unofficially (and in reality) they're adding to the capabilities of a surveillance state. Republicans are going on the assumption that they'll never be out of power again and are throwing every lever available to create and maintain their conservative utopian hell in America.
Something this extreme should require legislation and not simply be a regulatory choice of a federal department. I can't see how this rule fits in to the regulatory mission of FCC.
This is exactly the kind of thing Republicans rail against when Dems are in charge. Every little regulation is framed as 'unelected bureaucrats overstepping their authority to oppress America'.
efhmc
(17,117 posts)Karma13612
(5,034 posts)OK.
So, Im OK then.
But I agree that this method of legislating is very troubling. Way TOO much governmental overreach, again.
Thanks for the info!
OC375
(1,157 posts)You'll always know who the criminal is, for every crime, however minor. Cookies, embedded AI agents, cameras, GPS, it could be done. Easily.
At some point, personal privacy and security are more of a concern to me than security of the group. Sorry, gang, but that's how I roll.
Wonder when or if we'll get a chance to draw the line? Wonder if we would actually part with our conveniences if it meant not being tracked, monetized and shilled to constantly? I think we're use to it.
Not a big leap to figure out who spends all the money they get paid, and quit hiring savers, to keep the employees on the hook. How about a pay cut, then a loan pitched by a wholly owned subsidiary of your employer to help you through the tough times... then another 10% pay cut? You might have quit over the whole 20%, so you're welcome. And, you can keep your job if you keep paying the loan.
AI is fascinating.
WestMichRad
(3,457 posts)Really?
So when I go electronics free and ride a bicycle, Ill be a highly suspicious potential criminal. Sigh.
Then theyll follow me around with a drone, I suppose.
Skittles
(173,390 posts)Karasu
(2,233 posts)Because anyone who doesnt agree to comply is obviously a criminal in their simplistic minds.
because eventually it's only THEM determining what is "right or wrong"
OC375
(1,157 posts)Ya gotta draw a line at some point.
not fooled
(6,795 posts)will keep you logged in.
DavidDvorkin
(20,721 posts)dalton99a
(95,839 posts)orangecrush
(31,567 posts)purr-rat beauty
(1,537 posts)Jacson6
(2,270 posts)Karasu
(2,233 posts)WAY too hard here in the land of the free."
It damn well better blow up in their fucking faces somehow.
hunter
(40,905 posts)cstanleytech
(28,652 posts)OC375
(1,157 posts)What a trap.
Layzeebeaver
(2,299 posts)It won't.