Grand Juror Told Trump DOJ Prosecutor 'Broadview Six' Case Was a 'Crock of Sh*t,' Wild Transcript Reveals
Source: MEDIAite
Jun 9th, 2026, 6:38 pm
An already unusual federal criminal case got even wilder Tuesday as grand jury transcripts were made public a rare development that was ordered by the judge after finding improprieties in the proceedings including one grand juror who flat-out declared the prosecutions case to be a crock of sh*t.
The case derives from an altercation at the Broadview ICE detention center in a suburb of Chicago, Illinois between federal agents and Democratic activist protesters that resulted in six people being charged for allegedly physically hinder[ing] and imped[ing] a federal agents vehicle. Among those charged was then-Democratic congressional candidate Kat Abughazalah.
Long story short, the entire case imploded last month when Judge April Perry with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, a Biden appointee, hauled in the prosecutors from President Donald Trumps Department of Justice to demand an explanation for improprieties in the grand jury proceedings. The prosecutors had turned in transcripts from the grand jury proceedings that were redacted and the judge was not satisfied with that, demanding the full transcripts. U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros permanently dismissed all remaining charges against the defendants, and was sharply scolded by the judge, who had previously served in that same U.S. Attorneys Office herself.
The trust had been broken between the prosecutors and the court, Perry said, commenting that she had never seen the types of prosecutorial behavior before a grand jury that I saw in those transcripts, lambasting the federal prosecutors for moments where they made improper comments to the grand jury, misrepresented or withheld information, or otherwise failed to meet their ethical and professional obligations. One specific issue was the multiple attempts the prosecutors made to get the indictment, failing to inform the grand jury of the prior no true bill that had been returned when the initial grand jury rejected the charges. Those transcripts were made public on Tuesday, and several passages were soon highlighted by legal commentators.
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/lawcrime/grand-juror-told-trump-doj-prosecutor-broadview-six-case-was-a-crock-of-sht-wild-transcript-reveals/
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143668085
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143674746
MustLoveBeagles
(17,925 posts)wyn borkins
(1,467 posts)So after graduating from law school and then passing the bar, how can you become so stupid (?).
ms liberty
(11,430 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,981 posts)Should be reviewed by judges from now on. The presumption of prosecutorial misconduct must now be assumed until proven otherwise b
Dem_in_Nebr.
(364 posts)I have to add that caveat because there may be Grand Juries that are not impaneled by the DOJ.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,981 posts)I am no longer willing to trust prosecutors to not abuse the GJ process, no matter the administration or jurisdiction. Even good prosecutors rely on the police for evidence, and the police have always been crypto-fascist, and willing to lie, withhold evidence, or be VERY selective in their investigations.
NoMoreRepugs
(12,271 posts)Scrivener7
(60,228 posts)Jack Valentino
(5,322 posts)SAME SHIT, DIFFERENT DAY from members of the Trump Anti-Christ administration....
"Lies, damn lies, and GODDAMNED lies"......