I mean, Pirro has the stakes and firewood all ready to go.

Because of illegal activity.

Or once was once recognized as illegal activity?

They do care about regulations, illegalities, compliance.

They also care about their situation being politicized as they don't want to discourage business.

This is a grab for an enemies list, or a grab to try and build ammo to attack certain banks for their practices, which are probably the opposite of 'debanking', and more like being honest and not letting people buy stupid Grump crap.

to close all accounts for non-citizens? Sounds political to me.

Then it should be perfectly fine for the administration to do this same thing to....whoever the fuck they want, really...

Global, liburl communist banks hate us, etc, etc, etc....it's prima facia complete fucking nonsense; that's why it makes complete sense to the nations idiots. They're the victims, ALWAYS, under all circumstances whatsoever.

cancelling accounts because they disagree with a customer's political persuasions.
Banks, however, do prefer to avoid investigations and harm to their reputations. If some banks are indeed closing accounts of prominent Republican operatives (Jeanine Pirro wouldn't concern herself with the closure of accounts of Democrats), it would only be because the banks suspected that the funds are tainted with illegality.

They've been so forth-coming.

🤔

ill gotten gains from fraudulently recorded business transactions through accounts in their banks. Would Judge Pirro rather that the banks expose themselves to political liability of freezing a prominent person's assets?

What if said customer has transactions with narcos or people like Epstein?

Banks are under no obligation to do business with Donald Trump.

Doesn't this amount to a "fishing expedition" unless she has some actionable evidence that the banks are doing this?

It’s almost their same MO. Complain about MAGA detractors doing something (often with extreme exaggerations), and then doing it themselves, often claiming they were forced to do it / it’s ok to do because the “other side did it.”