AI will tell NHS patients if they need a GP appointment
Source: Telegraph via Yahoo
The move to use AI chatbots as the front door to primary care marks one of the biggest changes to the way patients access family doctors for a generation.
-snip-
If a GP appointment is recommended, a clinician will decide whether one is needed and how urgently the patient should be seen. In other cases, the AI will recommend alternatives such as pharmacies, self-care or emergency services.
During the trial, every recommendation will be checked by clinicians, who will be able to override the chatbot's advice retrospectively, calling patients back if they believe a GP appointment or more urgent care is needed.
However, the long-term aim is to remove that safeguard, if the trial shows AI works safely, allowing it to advise millions of patients without clinical back-up.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ai-tell-nhs-patients-gp-213000250.html
Hallucinating chatbots, advising patients without any clinical backup by humans.
This is crazy. Unfortunately the current UK government is entirely too close to AI companies
And here in the US we have Dr. 0z just as eager to have chatbots offering medical advice.
See my OP in GD about a study published a few months ago showing how badly chatbots fail at giving the correct medical advice:
'Unbelievably dangerous': experts sound alarm after ChatGPT Health fails to recognise medical emergencies (The Guardian)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221066192
RockRaven
(20,138 posts)Generational-scandal-level badly, if it gets broadly implemented after the trial (no matter how good those trial results look, which they won't).
Karasu
(2,403 posts)Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
in2herbs This message was self-deleted by its author.
xocetaceans
(4,446 posts)That seems very doubtful.
This passage is from a seemingly separate article from the same URL as the OP but from further down the page:
By James Murray
...
My priority as Health and Social Care Secretary is now to maximise the return on that investment for patients and staff.
That's why I've made sure we're backing the projects and innovations I believe will deliver the greatest improvements in diagnosis times, operating costs and efficiency.
I'm talking about the tools and processes that will cut waiting lists faster, reduce non-attendance at appointments and free up more time for clinicians to focus on what they do best: caring for patients.
These include ambient voice technology, AI-assisted triage through the NHS app, Microsoft Copilot, digital therapeutics that support treatment at home, and follow-up services initiated by patients that give people greater control over their care.
...
James Murray is the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and the Labour MP for Ealing North.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ai-tell-nhs-patients-gp-213000250.html
highplainsdem
(63,852 posts)From my OP a few months ago and the study I linked to:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221066192
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-026-04297-7
Published: 23 February 2026
ChatGPT Health performance in a structured test of triage recommendations
Ashwin Ramaswamy, Alvira Tyagi, Hannah Hugo, Joy Jiang, Pushkala Jayaraman, Mateen Jangda, Alexis E. Te, Steven A. Kaplan, Joshua Lampert, Robert Freeman, Nicholas Gavin, Ashutosh K. Tewari, Ankit Sakhuja, Bilal Naved, Alexander W. Charney, Mahmud Omar, Michael A. Gorin, Eyal Klang & Girish N. Nadkarni
Abstract
ChatGPT Health launched in January 2026 as OpenAIs consumer health tool, reaching millions of users. Here, we conducted a structured stress test of triage recommendations using 60 clinician-authored vignettes across 21 clinical domains under 16 factorial conditions (960 total responses). Performance followed an inverted U-shaped pattern, with the most dangerous failures concentrated at clinical extremes: non-urgent presentations (35%) and emergency conditions (48%). Among gold-standard emergencies, the system under-triaged 52% of cases, directing patients with diabetic ketoacidosis and impending respiratory failure to 2448-hour evaluation rather than the emergency department, while correctly triaging classical emergencies such as stroke and anaphylaxis. When family or friends minimized symptoms (anchoring bias), triage recommendations shifted significantly in edge cases (OR 11.7, 95% CI 3.7-36.6), with the majority of shifts toward less urgent care. Crisis intervention messages activated unpredictably across suicidal ideation presentations, firing more when patients described no specific method than when they did. Patient race, gender, and barriers to care showed no significant effects, though confidence intervals did not exclude clinically meaningful differences. Our findings reveal missed high-risk emergencies and inconsistent activation of crisis safeguards, raising safety concerns that warrant prospective validation before consumer-scale deployment of artificial intelligence triage systems.
Miguelito Loveless
(6,081 posts)He may have been annoying, but he never had hallucinations.
not fooled
(6,825 posts)This is how they will get there...step by step. And a largely ignorant, careless, oblivious populace will not stop it.
Miguelito Loveless
(6,081 posts)Simply tax billionaires, close tax loopholes, and fund the NHS properly. Stop trying to provide healthcare on the cheap while enriching foreign Tech Bros b