Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(63,548 posts)
Thu Mar 13, 2025, 04:31 PM 13 hrs ago

Rubio seemingly purporting to exempt immigration regulations and policy from notice and comment rulemaking requirements

Reposted by Domestic Enemy Hat

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social‬

Follow
🚨 Holy crap. Marco Rubio is seemingly purporting to exempt nearly all immigration regulations and policy, along with things like export controls, trade rules, and more, from notice and comment rulemaking requirements.

https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-04116.pdf
5. For these reasons, I hereby determine that all efforts, conducted by any agency of the federal government, to control the status, entry, and exit of people, and the transfer of goods, services, data, technology, and other items across the borders of the United States, constitute a foreign affairs function of the United States under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, 554.
Dated: February 21, 2025.
Marco Rubio, Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2025-04116 Filed: 3/13/2025 8:45 am; Publication Date: 3/14/2025]
ALT
March 13, 2025 at 3:24 P

https://bsky.app/profile/reichlinmelnick.bsky.social/post/3lkbt4h5ojs2e

BeaglesResist🐾💙✊🏻
‪@beaglesresist.bsky.social‬

Follow
RFK Jr just did this at HHS. It is extraordinarily stupid, dangerous, and arrogant to deny the public (especially expert clinicians) a forum in which to opine.

The last thing the musk-trump regime wants is for the actual truth to be told.

https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/regulatory/rfk-jr-orders-hhs-end-notice-public-comment-process-rulemaking
https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/regulatory/rfk-jr-orders-hhs-end-notice-public-comment-process-rulemaking
RFK Jr. orders HHS to end 'extra-statutory' notice, public comment process in rulemaking]
Editor's note: This story was originally published on Feb. 28 but has since been updated with additional industry group statements and other https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/regulatory/rfk-jr-orders-hhs-end-notice-public-comment-process-rulemakingcommentary. | The HHS secretary said the public feedback me...
www.fiercehealthcare.com]
March 13, 2025 at 3:32 PM

https://bsky.app/profile/beaglesresist.bsky.social/post/3lkbtkp3jjs2p
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rubio seemingly purporting to exempt immigration regulations and policy from notice and comment rulemaking requirements (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 13 hrs ago OP
This appears to be illegal Wiz Imp 13 hrs ago #1
Hmm... I'm not sure that holds up in court. slightlv 5 hrs ago #2

Wiz Imp

(4,151 posts)
1. This appears to be illegal
Thu Mar 13, 2025, 04:47 PM
13 hrs ago
https://www.gao.gov/federal-rulemaking

Expedited rulemaking. Federal agencies are usually required to publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register and solicit public comments before finalizing regulations. However, there are exceptions to expedite rulemaking in certain circumstances, such as for an emergency or other “good cause.” Although agencies often request public comments on rules they’ve expedited, they do not always respond to these comments.


I'm sure they'll argue it's for emergency or other "good cause" but I'm not sure that holds up in court.

slightlv

(5,093 posts)
2. Hmm... I'm not sure that holds up in court.
Fri Mar 14, 2025, 12:10 AM
5 hrs ago

I understand what you're saying and why, and I agree. But who thinks it would make a difference to the trump administration? They are totally lawless, even to the constitution and our rights. Why would breaking this rule be any different to them? And who's going to make them do otherwise? The Judicial branch may gig them, but it's the executive branch that's tasked with carrying out the laws. If the executive branch won't do it, who will make them and how? We've already proven you can't touch a president (or even anyone who's gotten close to the Oval Office), even if he's a thief, a liar, a con artist, and a rapist, as well as an insurrectionist.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Rubio seemingly purportin...