Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Senate Passes Megabill as Murkowski Stays Bought
In a wraparound amendment, a new tax on solar and wind gets dropped.By David Dayen
Welcome to Trumps Beautiful Disaster, a pop-up newsletter about the Republican tax and spending bill, one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in a generation. Sign up for the newsletter to get it in your in-box.
By the thinnest of margins, the U.S. Senate completed work on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on Tuesday morning, after Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) decided that she could live with a bill that takes food and medicine from vulnerable people to fund tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy, as long as it didnt take quite as much food away from Alaskans.
The new text, now 887 pages, was released at 11:20 a.m. ET. The finishing touches of it, which included handwritten additions to the text, played out live on C-SPAN, with scenes of the parliamentarian and a host of staff members from both parties huddled together.
At the very end, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer knocked out the name One Big Beautiful Bill Act with a parliamentary maneuver, on the grounds that it was ridiculous (which is hard to argue). Its unclear what this bill is even called now, but that hardly matters. The final bill passed 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie.
Murkowski was able to secure a waiver from cost-sharing provisions that would for the first time force states to pay for part of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). In order to get that past the Senate parliamentarian, ten states with the highest payment error rates had to be eligible for the five-year waiver, including big states like New York and Florida, and several blue states as well.
https://americanprospect.bluelena.io/index.php?action=social&chash=0084ae4bc24c0795d1e6a4f58444d39b.3411&s=4ad9d5fb309cb2240103b1ed74b1c681
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Senate Passes Megabill as Murkowski Stays Bought (Original Post)
Passages
Jul 1
OP
Maddow Blog-Alaska's Lisa Murkowski criticizes megabill after voting for it: 'We're not there yet'
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 1
#2
MacKasey
(1,402 posts)1. The name is THE BIG BULLSHIT BILL!
LetMyPeopleVote
(166,448 posts)2. Maddow Blog-Alaska's Lisa Murkowski criticizes megabill after voting for it: 'We're not there yet'
The Republican senator tried to explain why she advanced a far-right megabill despite serious reservations, but her reasoning doesnt make sense.
Among the many problems with Lisa Murkowskiâs odd rationale for voting for a megabill she didnât like: She expects House Republicans to ârecognize that weâre not there yet.â
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-07-01T17:49:27.107Z
GOP leaders fundamentally reject her vision â and have every intention of ignoring it. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/alaskas-lisa-murkowski-criticizes-megabill-voting-re-not-yet-rcna216281
Around this time eight years ago, House Republicans had already passed a right-wing heath care bill intended to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, but Senate Republicans were struggling to keep their members in line. Alaskas Lisa Murkowski, in particular, said she simply couldnt get on board.
To win her over, GOP leaders came up with a variety of ideas intended to help Alaskans so they wouldnt feel the punishments that Republicans were eager to impose on the rest of the country. The proposed carve-outs and schemes were even given memorable, albeit unflattering, nicknames: Alaska Purchase, Klondike Kickback and, my personal favorite, Polar Payoff.
The core of the partys offer was simple: If Murkowski let Republicans repeal Obamacare, GOP leaders would agree to let Alaska keep Obamacare.
It didnt work. Murkowski remained unconvinced, and she ultimately helped derail the gambit and rescue the countrys health care system......
This time, however, it did work. NBC News reported:
Even more striking, however, was something the Alaska Republican said after the dust settled on the dramatic vote: Murkowski said she hopes House Republicans make changes to the Senates version of the bill......
But thats a difficult position to take seriously. For one thing, if shed joined the bipartisan minority that opposed this bill, it wouldnt have killed the legislation; it wouldve opened the door to a new round of negotiations in the Senate where Murkowski couldve exercised enormous influence. By giving up her leverage, shes apparently hoping to see House members do the work she couldve been involved in directly.
For another, Republican leaders fundamentally disagree with her entire vision of the process. Murkowski apparently believes itll be up to the House to recognize that were not there yet, but as far as the White House and GOP leaders are concerned, the negotiations are over. Theres nothing left to talk about. The bill is done. The Houses job is to approve it, as is, quickly and with as little fuss as possible.
If, as expected, House Republicans do as theyre told and approve the Senate version of the bill without changes, it means Murkowski will have made it possible to implement the most regressive piece of legislation in modern history a bill she admits remains flawed and in need of changes and that will further mean that she bears responsibility for the consequences the package imposes on the nation.
To win her over, GOP leaders came up with a variety of ideas intended to help Alaskans so they wouldnt feel the punishments that Republicans were eager to impose on the rest of the country. The proposed carve-outs and schemes were even given memorable, albeit unflattering, nicknames: Alaska Purchase, Klondike Kickback and, my personal favorite, Polar Payoff.
The core of the partys offer was simple: If Murkowski let Republicans repeal Obamacare, GOP leaders would agree to let Alaska keep Obamacare.
It didnt work. Murkowski remained unconvinced, and she ultimately helped derail the gambit and rescue the countrys health care system......
This time, however, it did work. NBC News reported:
[Murkowski], who had expressed concerns throughout the process about the bills cuts to social safety net programs, was a key vote for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to win over. I struggled mightily with the impact on the most vulnerable in this country, when you look to Medicaid and SNAP, Murkowski told reporters after the vote, adding that she didnt get everything she wanted but I had to look on balance.
Even more striking, however, was something the Alaska Republican said after the dust settled on the dramatic vote: Murkowski said she hopes House Republicans make changes to the Senates version of the bill......
But thats a difficult position to take seriously. For one thing, if shed joined the bipartisan minority that opposed this bill, it wouldnt have killed the legislation; it wouldve opened the door to a new round of negotiations in the Senate where Murkowski couldve exercised enormous influence. By giving up her leverage, shes apparently hoping to see House members do the work she couldve been involved in directly.
For another, Republican leaders fundamentally disagree with her entire vision of the process. Murkowski apparently believes itll be up to the House to recognize that were not there yet, but as far as the White House and GOP leaders are concerned, the negotiations are over. Theres nothing left to talk about. The bill is done. The Houses job is to approve it, as is, quickly and with as little fuss as possible.
If, as expected, House Republicans do as theyre told and approve the Senate version of the bill without changes, it means Murkowski will have made it possible to implement the most regressive piece of legislation in modern history a bill she admits remains flawed and in need of changes and that will further mean that she bears responsibility for the consequences the package imposes on the nation.