The FBI Redacted Trump's Name in the Epstein Files The bureau's FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review
LOTS of details in this article.
The FBI Redacted Trumps Name in the Epstein Files
The bureaus FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review of the records blacked out the names before higher-ups said last month that releasing the documents would not be appropriate or warranted.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi
By Jason Leopold August 1, 2025 at 9:35 AM CDT
...............The FBI employees reviewed the records using the Freedom of Information Act as their guide for deciding what information should be withheld. That alone isnt uncommon. In the FOIA, Congress established nine exemptions as a way to balance the publics right to know against the governments need to protect sensitive interests, such as national security, official deliberations, ongoing law enforcement proceedings or privacy. When such competing interests arise in non-FOIA matters, those exemptions are often applied even if the exact language set forth in the FOIA statute doesnt appear in the final record.
For example,................
While reviewing the Epstein files, FBI personnel identified numerous references to Trump in the documents, the people familiar with the matter told me. Dozens of other high-profile public figures also appeared, the people said. (The appearance of Trumps name or others in the Epstein files is not evidence of a crime or even a suggestion of wrongdoing.)
In preparation for potential public release, the documents then went to a unit of FOIA officers who applied redactions in accordance with the nine exemptions. The people familiar with the matter said that Trumps name, along with other high-profile individuals, was blacked out because he was a private citizen when the federal investigation of Epstein was launched in 2006.
In particular, the reviewers applied two FOIA exemptions to justify their redactions. The first, Exemption 6, protects individuals against a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The Supreme Court has said the exemption protects "individuals from the injury and embarrassment" that would result from the disclosure of personal information in possession of the government.
The second, Exemption 7(C), protects personal information contained in law enforcement records, the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. .............................
Pictures/photos from the article:
https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/i6J5nYOf5t8g/v1/1546x1192.webp
A page from Epsteins black book, containing the names of various contacts, which included Trump.
Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago in 2000.
Photographer: Davidoff Studios Photography/Archive Photos
Exactly! The 1,000 or so employees were tasked with marking the names of high profile figures for redaction. There was even a master spreadsheet on the high side SharePoint used to log the mentions of Trump himself for redaction. www.bloomberg.com/news/newslet...
— Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2025-08-01T15:09:45.892Z

Botany
(75,271 posts).. syndicate.
johnnyfins
(2,838 posts)He will skate again. The victims will never get justice. Our country is becoming a joke.
EarlG
(23,177 posts)it seems like a no-win for Trump. If they redact just his name then everybody knows that every time there's a black bar it means "Trump." But if they redact all the names then people will know that Trump's name is under some of those black bars, but not which ones, so if the files contain descriptions of awful behavior engaged in by (black bar) then people will be free to assume that he could be responsible for any of that behavior, even if he isn't.
The only alternative would be to release the files with none of the names redacted. I wonder why the Trump administration would not want to do that?
Uncle Joe
(63,125 posts)LymphocyteLover
(8,710 posts)LymphocyteLover
(8,710 posts)even a suggestion of wrongdoing, why is he so nervous releasing them???