Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(77,698 posts)
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:01 PM Aug 1

The FBI Redacted Trump's Name in the Epstein Files The bureau's FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review

LOTS of details in this article.



The FBI Redacted Trump’s Name in the Epstein Files

The bureau’s FOIA team tasked with conducting a final review of the records blacked out the names before higher-ups said last month that releasing the documents ‘would not be appropriate or warranted.’


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbi

By Jason Leopold August 1, 2025 at 9:35 AM CDT


...............The FBI employees reviewed the records using the Freedom of Information Act as their guide for deciding what information should be withheld. That alone isn’t uncommon. In the FOIA, Congress established nine exemptions as a way to balance the public’s right to know against the government’s need to protect sensitive interests, such as national security, official deliberations, ongoing law enforcement proceedings or privacy. When such competing interests arise in non-FOIA matters, those exemptions are often applied even if the exact language set forth in the FOIA statute doesn’t appear in the final record.

For example,................

While reviewing the Epstein files, FBI personnel identified numerous references to Trump in the documents, the people familiar with the matter told me. Dozens of other high-profile public figures also appeared, the people said. (The appearance of Trump’s name or others in the Epstein files is not evidence of a crime or even a suggestion of wrongdoing.)

In preparation for potential public release, the documents then went to a unit of FOIA officers who applied redactions in accordance with the nine exemptions. The people familiar with the matter said that Trump’s name, along with other high-profile individuals, was blacked out because he was a private citizen when the federal investigation of Epstein was launched in 2006.

In particular, the reviewers applied two FOIA exemptions to justify their redactions. The first, Exemption 6, protects individuals against “a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” The Supreme Court has said the exemption protects "individuals from the injury and embarrassment" that would result from the disclosure of personal information in possession of the government.

The second, Exemption 7(C), protects personal information contained in law enforcement records, the disclosure of which “could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” .............................



Pictures/photos from the article:


https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/i6J5nYOf5t8g/v1/1546x1192.webp
A page from Epstein’s “black book,” containing the names of various contacts, which included Trump.




Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago in 2000.
Photographer: Davidoff Studios Photography/Archive Photos

Exactly! The 1,000 or so employees were tasked with marking the names of high profile figures for redaction. There was even a master spreadsheet on the high side SharePoint used to log the mentions of Trump himself for redaction. www.bloomberg.com/news/newslet...

Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2025-08-01T15:09:45.892Z




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Botany

(75,271 posts)
1. The D o J and the FBI are no longer in "the rule of law" but are now into the Trump/Putin/Musk crime ....
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:20 PM
Aug 1

….. syndicate.

johnnyfins

(2,838 posts)
2. Anyone surprised by this?
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:24 PM
Aug 1

He will skate again. The victims will never get justice. Our country is becoming a joke.

EarlG

(23,177 posts)
3. If this is why the files are being withheld, then wow
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 12:25 PM
Aug 1

it seems like a no-win for Trump. If they redact just his name then everybody knows that every time there's a black bar it means "Trump." But if they redact all the names then people will know that Trump's name is under some of those black bars, but not which ones, so if the files contain descriptions of awful behavior engaged in by (black bar) then people will be free to assume that he could be responsible for any of that behavior, even if he isn't.

The only alternative would be to release the files with none of the names redacted. I wonder why the Trump administration would not want to do that?

LymphocyteLover

(8,710 posts)
5. If the appearance of Trump's name or others in the Epstein files is not evidence of a crime or
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 01:42 PM
Aug 1

even a suggestion of wrongdoing, why is he so nervous releasing them???

LymphocyteLover

(8,710 posts)
7. Just saw this video-- tRump told Howard Stern he would have no problem having sex with a 12 year old
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 02:43 PM
Aug 1

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The FBI Redacted Trump's ...