Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Trojan Horse Strategy: Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation as Network Capture
Lots to chew on here.
https://medium.com/@eddieoz/the-trojan-horse-strategy-institutional-bitcoin-accumulation-as-network-capture-fd906ff9b0b0
It was not paywalled for me.
The rise of institutional Bitcoin adoption may not signal the triumph of decentralized money, but rather its most sophisticated defeat. Evidence indicates that governments and financial institutions led by the United States and major central banks could be executing a long-term plan to accumulate Bitcoin, not to embrace or adopt it, but to control and ultimately undermine its revolutionary potential. This mirrors historical patterns where powerful actors initially resist disruptive technologies, only to later co-opt them as tools of control, turning instruments of liberation into mechanisms of domination.
The implications reach far beyond financial markets. By amassing significant Bitcoin holdings while developing surveillance-capable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), institutions may be positioning themselves to launch a coordinated attack on Bitcoins network security during a future crisis, offering their own controlled alternatives as solutions. Understanding this strategy requires examining historical precedents, current accumulation patterns, technical vulnerabilities, and the philosophical divisions within Bitcoin that create exploitable weaknesses.
The historical playbook for technology capture
History shows a recurring pattern: governments initially resist transformative technologies out of control concerns, then systematically adopt and co-opt them for strategic advantage. This cycle spans from radio broadcasting to the internet, consistently following four phases: opposition, crisis response, regulatory capture, and strategic control.
Radio broadcasting is a prime example. From 1910 to 1927, the Department of Commerce lacked authority to deny radio licenses, sparking fears of uncontrolled information and frequency chaos. The Radio Act of 1927 established the Federal Radio Commission with licensing power, followed by the Communications Act of 1934, which created the FCC with expanded regulatory authority. Within two decades, radio shifted from an uncontrollable medium to a tightly regulated tool serving government interests through licensing and content control.
The implications reach far beyond financial markets. By amassing significant Bitcoin holdings while developing surveillance-capable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), institutions may be positioning themselves to launch a coordinated attack on Bitcoins network security during a future crisis, offering their own controlled alternatives as solutions. Understanding this strategy requires examining historical precedents, current accumulation patterns, technical vulnerabilities, and the philosophical divisions within Bitcoin that create exploitable weaknesses.
The historical playbook for technology capture
History shows a recurring pattern: governments initially resist transformative technologies out of control concerns, then systematically adopt and co-opt them for strategic advantage. This cycle spans from radio broadcasting to the internet, consistently following four phases: opposition, crisis response, regulatory capture, and strategic control.
Radio broadcasting is a prime example. From 1910 to 1927, the Department of Commerce lacked authority to deny radio licenses, sparking fears of uncontrolled information and frequency chaos. The Radio Act of 1927 established the Federal Radio Commission with licensing power, followed by the Communications Act of 1934, which created the FCC with expanded regulatory authority. Within two decades, radio shifted from an uncontrollable medium to a tightly regulated tool serving government interests through licensing and content control.
LOTS more at the link.
My own thoughts? See my recent posts.
The Bitcoin Coup: How Crypto Accelerationists Engineered America's Financial Collapse
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220508380
And who is behind it, the "rear guard" of the soon to expire Trump monarchy.
The ones who bought it for him, knowing he has one foot in the grave.
Welcome to your new Vance-Musk-Thiel Crypto-Bro Overlords
Someone already posted the family portrait on substack.

The look of pure evil.
"Bad guys always adopt a new technology ahead of others and pillage"
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

The Trojan Horse Strategy: Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation as Network Capture (Original Post)
usonian
Aug 3
OP
Fiendish Thingy
(20,699 posts)1. Can't tell if this is good or bad news...
So, governments are going to dominate the crypto markets and yank the rug out from underneath the cryptobros (most of whom will still make out like bandits, leaving the latecomers holding the bag when the Ponzi Pyramid collapses)?
Yay?
usonian
(20,321 posts)2. When Trump kicks the bucket the Crypto Bros ARE the government.

Mission Accomplished.
