Editorials & Other Articles

Dulcinea

(9,500 posts) Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:29 PM Nov 1

US lawmakers intensify calls for Andrew to address Epstein ties

LONDON (Reuters) -Members of a U.S. congressional committee investigating the Jeffrey Epstein case have intensified their calls for Andrew Mountbatten Windsor to answer questions about his ties to the late financier and sex offender, the BBC reported on Saturday.

King Charles stripped Andrew of his title of prince and evicted him from his mansion in the grounds of Windsor Castle on Thursday, responding to the outrage that had built around the royal over years of damaging headlines about his behaviour.

Buckingham Palace said the censures were needed even though Andrew has continued to deny the allegations made against him.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/us-lawmakers-intensify-calls-andrew-113100994.html

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US lawmakers intensify calls for Andrew to address Epstein ties (Original Post) Dulcinea Nov 1 OP

IMO, it would depend on the price, don't you think? no_hypocrisy Nov 1 #1

WTF?? I click on the link, and an entire yahoo page about consent niyad Nov 1 #2

That's strange. Dulcinea Nov 1 #3

I had to go to the very bottom of the page to reject all. I had never seen niyad Nov 1 #6

You probably set your cookie consent some time previous. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 1 #8

Consent and cookie management is not BS. It protects you and is required by European law. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 1 #7

As I said, I had never seen that overlay or whatever it was, before. niyad Nov 1 #10

FUCK YOU, reuters. It is DEMOCRATIC Congressmember. niyad Nov 1 #4

It's Mr. Andrew Windsor. We are not on first name basis and I doubt you are. You dont have to copy the title verbatim Bernardo de La Paz Nov 1 #5

Actually, it is Rapist Scum andrew. niyad Nov 1 #9

I notice your pointed capitalization. Cheers. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 1 #11

Thank you. niyad Nov 1 #13

How about demanding answers from the wannabe king, pedo rapist? niyad Nov 1 #12

no_hypocrisy

(53,877 posts)

1. IMO, it would depend on the price, don't you think?

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:30 PM

Nov 1

niyad

(128,859 posts)

2. WTF?? I click on the link, and an entire yahoo page about consent

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:31 PM

Nov 1

and cookies comes up. Fuck that bs.

Dulcinea

(9,500 posts)

3. That's strange.

Reply to niyad (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:33 PM

Nov 1

I double checked & it worked fine for me.

niyad

(128,859 posts)

6. I had to go to the very bottom of the page to reject all. I had never seen

Reply to Dulcinea (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:40 PM

Nov 1

that blue page in a yahoo link before.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

8. You probably set your cookie consent some time previous. . . . . nt

Reply to Dulcinea (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:43 PM

Nov 1

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

7. Consent and cookie management is not BS. It protects you and is required by European law.

Reply to niyad (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:42 PM

Nov 1

Notice the 237 partners they sell your data to.

Just click Reject All and read the article.

It's actually an overlay, not a separate page.

niyad

(128,859 posts)

10. As I said, I had never seen that overlay or whatever it was, before.

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #7)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:47 PM

Nov 1

I did get to the article.

niyad

(128,859 posts)

4. FUCK YOU, reuters. It is DEMOCRATIC Congressmember.

Reply to Dulcinea (Original post)

Sat Nov 1, 2025, 12:37 PM

Nov 1

One would think that reuters, which USED to be reputable, would know the difference between a noun and an adjective, and not follow the bullshit, deliberately insulting framing frim the rwnj's and their propaganda machine.