The Shameful Eight and The Failure of Democratic Leadership
Last week, Democrats were riding high, not just because they won key races in California, New Jersey and Virginia by sizeable margins, but they also scored wins in places like Georgia and Mississippi that triggered alarm bells up and down Pennsylvania Avenue. This came as public opinion was blaming President Trump and the Republicans for the record government shutdown.
Then the Democrats juggernaut derailed as 7 Democrats and Independent Angus King announced that they had signed on to a compromise that appeared to catch House Democrats and some of their Senate colleagues by surprise. In a chamber that has seen brilliant Democratic strategists from LBJ to George Mitchell to Harry Reid, the Shameful Eight instead evoked Homer Simpson as they folded and saved President Trump and the Republicans.
In criticizing their decision, I want to make clear that there is no disputing that the shutdown was having serious consequences, some of which the Trump administration was keen to exacerbate. The shutdown could not go on much longer and, with Trump increasingly indifferent to the shutdown pain as he celebrated in Great Gatsby style, Democrats likely would have to compromise or maybe even fold to reopen the government when the time came.
To their credit, the Federal Folders agreed to Democratic leader Schumers request to delay any compromise until after the election. What is inexplicable is why they folded when they did? At a minimum, rather than folding on a Sunday night, they could have waited to give their Senate and/or House Democratic colleagues the heads up in order to enable them to craft a more unified response.
A Failure of Leadership
Learning of the compromise, I was most upset with Senator Durbin because he is the Democratic Whip. How he could so readily throw his caucus under the bus is astounding. I immediately messaged him to urge him to step aside as leader and let someone with fire in their belly take over.
Shame on Senator Schumer as well. He knew this was coming, so why was he so unprepared for it? How could the Democrats not have had a unified exit strategy where they would declare victory while allowing the government to reopen on a short-term basis? This only confirms activists view of Schumer, with his stern letters and monotone floor speeches, as a relic of another era who either fails to appreciate the threat presented by Trump or is incapable of rising to the moment.
The stakes are too high; Schumer and Durbin must step aside without delay before the next shutdown battle and midterm elections.
Equal Branches of Grift
In reaching a deal with the GOP, Senator Kaine did extract some concessions for federal workers, including backpay and reinstatement for laid-off workers, and the bill would fund SNAP for a year.
Yet, when it came to funding Obamacare subsidies, all the Shameful Eight got was a Lucy Brown promise from Majority Leader Thune for a floor vote on funding (but still subject to filibuster and requiring 60 votes). Even worse, they got played like a drum. Senator Thune immediately demonstrated his good faith, as the bill they voted for makes no mention of a future Obamacare vote but included a lottery ticket for eight pro-insurrection Republican Senators that allowed them to sue the government for up to $1 million for Special Counsel Jack Smiths proper subpoena of their phone providers to get a log of their phone calls with President Trump before and after January 6th. Two of the eight, Senators Hawley (R-MO) and Sullivan (R-AK), are former Attorneys General and are certain to have approved similar subpoenas.
Now, thanks to the esteemed members of the Senate Homer Simpson caucus of Senators Durbin, Shaheen, Kaine, King, Cortez-Mastro, Hassan, and Fetterman (who collectively have 90 years of legislative experience), the Senate just established itself as a co-equal branch of grift.
Carpe Continuing Resolution
The compromise funds the government through January, which means that the party only has ten weeks to regroup and find a general who can lead this fight against a President who will be weakened by a declining economy and the Epstein scandal. From there, the new leadership can carry a revitalized party into the midterms and what could be a promising November.
Bennet Kelley (@bennet.bsky.social) is an award-winning political columnist and blogger, former radio host, and former Co-Founder and National Co-Chair of the Democratic National Committee's young professional fund-raising and outreach arm during the Clinton era. He is a proud native Rhode Islander and practices internet law in Los Angeles.
bottomofthehill
(9,318 posts)Is Leader Jefferies not painted with the same brush. He lost enough Democrats in the House to give the Republican Party a landslide vote ( by current House standards) in the House. Should we not be looking for other Leadership there too.
Lonestarblue
(13,143 posts)WSHazel
(622 posts)The only thing the cave by these 8 did was not force Republicans to end run the filibuster. Republicans are in the majority and can do whatever they want, and we can not stop them. The hand wringing over what is ultimately a pretty inside baseball outcome seems a bit much.
gab13by13
(30,783 posts)The only problem, I see, with Jeffries, is, that he uses, too many, commas, when, he speaks.
orangecrush
(27,701 posts)
I can't.
Bluetus
(2,009 posts)The 8 were chosen because they dont stand for election next year.
The problem is not just Schumer, although he is worse than worthless. The problem is that the party is far too tolerant of empty suits who do nothing to advance the causes of progress and justice. The system is rigged to favor the smaller states. Every seat, especially in the Senate, is precious. We cannot afford to have a single weak sister, moderate, centrist or whatever they want to be called. And we can't live with a DNC that actively supports those players and actively fights against progressives.
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,208 posts)Senate Republicans empowered themselves to file lucrative Arctic Frost lawsuits, but House Republicans intend to take that power away.
GOP's Lindsey Graham says he'll 'definitely' sue over faux phone records controversy www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Chrisby (@chrisbyc.bsky.social) 2025-11-13T16:52:35.689Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gops-lindsey-graham-says-ll-definitely-sue-faux-phone-records-controve-rcna243711
Graham, who had his phone records seized, said Wednesday that he would definitely sue under the law. And if you think Im going to settle this thing for a million dollars? No, Graham told reporters in South Carolina. I want to make it so painful no one ever does this again.
He did not appear to be kidding.
Link to tweet
But before Grahams lawyers head to a nearby courthouse, they should probably take note of the fact that a whole lot of House members including plenty of Republicans arent pleased about the Senate GOPs gambit, and theyre eager to do something about it. Roll Call reported:
Speaker Mike Johnson announced plans to pursue legislation next week that would repeal a Senate provision in a major spending package that incensed House Republicans and threatened to prolong the partial government shutdown. The must-pass spending measure drew eleventh-hour objections from House members of both parties after the discovery in recent days of a provision that would allow senators to sue for at least $500,000 each when federal investigators search their phone records in a judicially sanctioned probe without notifying them.
In comments to reporters this week, the House speaker conceded the Senates provision was a really bad look, which his chamber intends to fix in a standalone bill.