Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Trump admin seeks to strike Epstein connections from record
Trump admin seeks to strike Epstein connections from record
The Trump admin employs an extreme stalling tactic in suit concerning potential Epstein-related Trump interviews
By Russell Payne
Staff Reporter
Published February 21, 2026 6:30AM (EST)
(Salon) The Trump administration is using an irregular legal tactic in an attempt to suppress court info, including regarding the presidents relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In multiple Freedom of Information Act suits, the administration is attempting to strike certain facts from the public record, a tactic typically aimed at delaying proceedings. One of these cases is aimed at revealing any interviews President Donald Trump may have done with law enforcement during the investigation into Epstein.
In recent months, Department of Justice lawyers have begun making motions to strike in some high-profile FOIA cases, including one concerned with the $400 million Qatari jet gifted to Trump, one regarding deportations to El Salvador, and two involving Epstein.
One of the Epstein-related cases concerns potential intervention by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel into the review of Epstein-related documents. The other is aimed at revealing any interviews with Trump law enforcement may have conducted in the 2005 to 2008 investigation into Epstein. Each FOIA case was brought by the nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight.
In the legal context, a motion to strike refers to a request to remove a piece of evidence from the courts record a move that is typically reserved only for when a piece of evidence is considered redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous. ..........................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2026/02/21/trump-admin-seeks-to-strike-epstein-connections-from-record/
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump admin seeks to strike Epstein connections from record (Original Post)
marmar
15 hrs ago
OP
Ocelot II
(129,952 posts)1. The harder Trump tries to conceal evidence, the worse it looks for him.
kimbutgar
(27,060 posts)2. The train has left the station
And the cat is out of the bag.
No matter what he says or does Epstein aint going away 🍊🐖💩!